Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

[quote]Conundrum wrote:

Kim Jung un sister is like a star at the olympics.

/quote]

A star among whom? CNN? In the real world South Koreans are not impressed.

Hardloper wrote:

[quote]Conundrum wrote:

Kim Jung un sister is like a star at the olympics.

/quote]

A star among whom? CNN? In the real world South Koreans are not impressed.

Your ignorance is beyond compare.

Re Dackter wrote:

Gordose wrote:

Ever heard of declassifying or redacting?

Let’s shine some light on the FISA process.

Funny how Dems are in love with FISA now after all those years of railing against it.

LOL . . . redacting is in the eye of the redactor. . . . tRump told Nunes how to edit the Republicon version of the memo -- no tRump bias, believe him, and no Dem review allowed -- and tRump is telling Republicons to "redact" the Dem memo -- no tRump bias, believe him, and no Dem review allowed.

Funny how Republicons are in love with redacted classified information that is bent entirely to tell a tRump-flavored story, and squash anything the tells a less biased version.

But. . . . but.... but . . . . IQ45.

Actually, the FBI and minority dems on the committee edited the memo.

Lol

Gordose wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:

I think you're onto something here. Why are the Dems opposed to releasing classified information? This isn't right at all!

Ever heard of declassifying or redacting?

Let’s shine some light on the FISA process.

Funny how Dems are in love with FISA now after all those years of railing against it.

Railing against FISA is a bipartisan thing. Nobody has been more critical of it than Republican Rand Paul. We have members on both sides who like it and don't like it for various reasons.

Hardloper wrote:

[quote]Conundrum wrote:

Kim Jung un sister is like a star at the olympics.

/quote]

A star among whom? CNN? In the real world South Koreans are not impressed.

Hard(onfortrump)loper,

You're getting distracted (I know that's easy to do, but...).

So what happened to " WE'RE BECOMING GREECE!!! HUGE DEBT IS UNFAIR TO OUR CHILDREN!! WE NEED TO BALANCE THE BUDGET!!!! " ?

Now that the half black guy with funny sounding name is gone.....none of that matters? Seriously?

" “If you were against President Obama’s deficits, and now you’re for the Republican deficits, isn’t that the very definition of hypocrisy?” Senator Rand Paul said as he held up passage of the budget bill for a few hours — perhaps until he realized that the definition fit him, too, since he had voted for the tax cuts that will blow up the deficit. "

And when Trump talked about the departing alleged wife beater Rob Porter, couldn't he have at least worked in one small bit, one WORD even, about...."now if these charges do turn out to be proven true, then.....what an awful thing he did, and my huuuge sympathies to these women, what a bad thing they had to go through. But for now we don't know for sure if they are true" between all the "What a GREAT guy" and " I feel really bad for him" and "he did a wonderful job and will be sorely missed", etc, etc, etc?? Ya know, just a single acknowledgement that he *MIGHT* be guilty of something heinous, and if so, those poor women who went through it, and what a scumbag the guy might be, and that in general wife beating is a bad thing?

Drain the Swamp! (but keep all the fiscal hypocrites, and sprinkle in some child molesters [the Honorable Roy Moore, well they tried] and wife beaters ).

Corrector wrote:

Actually, the FBI and minority dems on the committee edited the memo.

Lol

LOL . . . actually, Deep State Republicans approved release of the memo and Trump decided to "edit" the approved it . . .

Fat hurts wrote:

Railing against FISA is a bipartisan thing. Nobody has been more critical of it than Republican Rand Paul. We have members on both sides who like it and don't like it for various reasons.

I know, what nonsense is the notion that dems have always hated FISA but R's supported it. Many libertarians have been some of the biggest critics of FISA/NSA, etc. Also silly that Dem's now "love FISA." No, they just know fake, hypocritical outrage from right wingers when they see it.

As I pointed out earlier, the great irony is that:

A) Republicans Bush/Cheney are the ones who flat out circumvented FISA and illegally were spying on Americans WITHOUT A FISA WARRANT. And right wingers, for the most, just shrugged. (!) But now..... think the process is being "abused" because..... Trump associated were involved. Lol indeed.

B) and it was Comey/Mueller who stood up to these FISA abuses, against the Republican abusers.

Comey/Mueller/Dems are not the ones with a past or present of abusing/circumventing the FISA system/process. Republicans are.

Anyone else find this guy’s posts difficult to read with all the caps, bold, and incoherent rambling?

Dude, I’m probably on your side, but you’ve got to get control of the lunatic rants if you want to be taken seriously.

Hard to read wrote:

Anyone else find this guy’s posts difficult to read with all the caps, bold, and incoherent rambling?

Dude, I’m probably on your side, but you’ve got to get control of the lunatic rants if you want to be taken seriously.

0/10, Hardloper.

+1

I’m def not on his side.

It helps if you read his posts like Crazy Eddie.

Raving Mad wrote:

Hard to read wrote:

Anyone else find this guy’s posts difficult to read with all the caps, bold, and incoherent rambling?

Dude, I’m probably on your side, but you’ve got to get control of the lunatic rants if you want to be taken seriously.

+1

I’m def not on his side.

It helps if you read his posts like Crazy Eddie.

Funny. He needs to start each post with “this post is insane!!!!!!”

Hard to read [aka Hardloper] wrote:

Raving Mad [aka Hardloper] wrote:

+1

Funny. He needs to start each post with “this post is insane!!!!!!”

^ HardLoper praising his own posts.

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

A star among whom? CNN? In the real world South Koreans are not impressed.

Hard(onfortrump)loper,

You're getting distracted (I know that's easy to do, but...).

So what happened to " WE'RE BECOMING GREECE!!! HUGE DEBT IS UNFAIR TO OUR CHILDREN!! WE NEED TO BALANCE THE BUDGET!!!! " ?

[Deficit hypocrisy etc etc etc]

When have I said any of that? Since you asked, I agree with Milton Friedman (and even the Keynesians) - low taxes and deficits are better than high taxes and a balanced budget. One thing Obama did right was he didn't really raise taxes beyond letting the Bush tax cuts expire.

ItsHardLoper wrote:

Hard to read [aka Hardloper] wrote:

Funny. He needs to start each post with “this post is insane!!!!!!”

^ HardLoper praising his own posts.

Doesn’t matter who it is. He is spot on.

Irregardless wrote:

ItsHardLoper wrote:

^ HardLoper praising his own posts.

Doesn’t matter who it is. He is spot on.

No it matters, because all you cowards change names every 5 seconds. Pu$$ies.

And yes, because I used caps (in this case to mock the overzealous cries of idiot right wingers like yourself, which went way over your head) and was more than 3 sentences long, I know, I know that means my post = "incoherent rambling." Great critical analysis.

Ok, if it makes you happy, no more caps, just for YOU! (whoops, couldn't help myself).

And now I will make a point on your level, for your attention span, that should appeal to your limited ability to understand the written word:

Repubs are mega-hypocrites on the debt/balanced budgets.

(no examples, no explanation, because that would be too much for you. And definitely no caps or bold, because I don't want to distract your feeble brain. I'll just leave it at that. See if you can wrap your puny mind around that one sentence. Then I'll answer any questions or doubts you might have concerning the accuracy of the statement.

But lemme guess, all I get back is: "Man, this guy rambles a lot. I'd even say incoherently. Because, yeah, that sounds like a good insult, and......it's all I got, so I repeat myself a lot." )

Conundrum wrote:

England doesn't even want him to visit, he was booed abroad when called news fake, pence and his wife didn't stand when the Korean team marched in (they were the only ones).

Two weeks ago, Democrats didn't stand for:

* The national anthem

* Record low unemployment

* Heroic North Korean defectors

And you're whining because Pence didn't stand for a cult regime that has starved millions to death in concentration camps?

No, not at all. I find his posts often emotional but of high quality. But I do know a diversion and an ad hominem attack when I see one.

You did not address the content of the post. 1) the hypocrisy of Reupublicans who used to be higher ground deficit hawks and 2) Trump's failure to ever express any concern to females who may have been abused by males.

I guess it's easier to address TR's passionate writing style.

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

And now I will make a point on your level, for your attention span, that should appeal to your limited ability to understand the written word:

Repubs are mega-hypocrites on the debt/balanced budgets.

(no examples, no explanation, because that would be too much for you. And definitely no caps or bold, because I don't want to distract your feeble brain. I'll just leave it at that. See if you can wrap your puny mind around that one sentence. Then I'll answer any questions or doubts you might have concerning the accuracy of the statement.

But lemme guess, all I get back is: "Man, this guy rambles a lot. I'd even say incoherently. Because, yeah, that sounds like a good insult, and......it's all I got, so I repeat myself a lot." )

It would also help if you stopped using so many intros-sentence parenthetical phrases.

They either need to be a standalone sentence or are information that is not needed.

Thanks in advance.