5,000 "migrants" a day? More money for ukraine? Nice try President klaine, nice try. Patriots shut that down. No migrants, not a one until an extensive background check and going through the proper immigration procedures. Why should someone overseas, that pesky ocean, have to wait for years to come here legally while others can just walk over a border? They shouldn't. Remain in Mexico happening now, catch and release Over. America.
-
38
-
LateNightEddy wrote:
centrist wrote:
What did I do that I deserve prison time for? Your posts are stupid and ugly.
You must not have been paying attention. If your political opponent hasn't actually committed a crime you invent one.
61 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
Nnonequalswee58 wrote:
We can. Just don’t expect Fox News to ever mention it.
I have 5 of these mass deportation T-shirts Trump handed out at the RNC. What the hell are we supposed to do with these? And the ear diapers.., WTF?
A better Tshirt:
Trump insults my intelligence hourly.
And I like it.
40 -
Antwaan Runkin El wrote:
LateNightEddy wrote:
You must not have been paying attention. If your political opponent hasn't actually committed a crime you invent one.
Yea Biden had the same boxes. He put his in the care of a literal crack addict whose primary source of income was selling his father. You didn't care.
Spare me your fake outrage.
212 -
LateNightEddy wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
How does the unaffiliated party behave?
How long has it been since you divorced yourself from reality?
You can claim you're "unaffiliated" but you sound like a leftist Democrat...
You're like a dude who says he's vegan and goes to the steakhouse every night.
Leftist ≠ Democrat.
The Democrats can’t get out of their own way and couldn’t beat Concept of a Plan.
31 -
Masked Off wrote:
5,000 "migrants" a day? More money for ukraine? Nice try President klaine, nice try. Patriots shut that down. No migrants, not a one until an extensive background check and going through the proper immigration procedures. Why should someone overseas, that pesky ocean, have to wait for years to come here legally while others can just walk over a border? They shouldn't. Remain in Mexico happening now, catch and release Over. America.
NAILED it. People in line for decades in some cases to come here and these Dems act like they care about people. it’s complete horseshlt. MAGA has this under control. Done playin’
27 -
trump2028! wrote:
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
I don't know why aid to Ukraine and Israel was included in the border bill. Congress groups things together all the time. I imagine after the border bill was shot down, we continued to support Ukraine and Israel under Biden, and Israel under Trump. I don't think the Biden admin was ever worried about getting those aid packages passed if that's what you're implying. Senator McConnell was a big supporter of Ukraine.
My question is about 5,000 number. I am trying to work out exactly where it says that 5,000 people would be accepted per day. Anyway here's Gemini again:
The 5,000 Figure:
The 5,000-encounters-per-day figure was a significant point of discussion.
If the average number of daily encounters reached or exceeded 5,000 over a seven-day period, certain restrictive measures could be triggered.
These measures could include:
Suspending asylum processing.
Expedited removal of migrants.
Other border-control actions.
It's Not an Allowance:
It's crucial to understand that the bill did not authorize or allow 5,000 people to enter the country daily.
Instead, it established a trigger point that, when reached, would enable the DHS to impose stricter border-control policies.Back to me now. It doesn't seem like 5000 would be "allowed" per day. That's a very loose, mostly incorrect interpretation of the bill, from what I'm reading. It seems like 5k is a threshold which could trigger the shutdown of processing altogether. In other words, it's more complicated than that. Of course it is.
But rephrase it - 4,999 migrants or fewer per day won't trigger a shutdown. Thus it codifies 4,999 per day.
It does not.
If we have a regulation that says that we close the Expressway if there are more than 100 car wrecks per day, that isn’t codifying 99 car wrecks per day.
100 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
LateNightEddy wrote:
You can claim you're "unaffiliated" but you sound like a leftist Democrat...
You're like a dude who says he's vegan and goes to the steakhouse every night.
Leftist ≠ Democrat.
The Democrats can’t get out of their own way and couldn’t beat Concept of a Plan.
I never have and never will come within a country mile of registering as a Democrat.
And yet I find it so annoying when people suggest that some significant proportion of the fault for Trump being reelected is on Democrats and/or the media.
For all intents and purposes, that was 100% the fault of the American people. As is the continuing support for him.
90 -
Noyankee wrote:
Masked Off wrote:
5,000 "migrants" a day? More money for ukraine? Nice try President klaine, nice try. Patriots shut that down. No migrants, not a one until an extensive background check and going through the proper immigration procedures. Why should someone overseas, that pesky ocean, have to wait for years to come here legally while others can just walk over a border? They shouldn't. Remain in Mexico happening now, catch and release Over. America.
NAILED it. People in line for decades in some cases to come here and these Dems act like they care about people. it’s complete horseshlt. MAGA has this under control. Done playin’
Except for the hotel and farm workers. Those illegals who cut the line can stay, without background checks, because Trump just said it’s ok.
80 -
LateNightEddy wrote:
Antwaan Runkin El wrote:
Yea Biden had the same boxes. He put his in the care of a literal crack addict whose primary source of income was selling his father. You didn't care.
Spare me your fake outrage.
You sound pretty outraged about it. Selectively outraged. Hypocritically outraged. Certain things have been pointed out to you many times before, and you act like you’re just now learning what a commode is. Spare me the fake flushage.
Baffrooms. Affidavits and baffrooms, that’s what it’s all about, Russia Boy.
50 -
This quoted post has been removed.
Fealty over policy
50 -
This quoted post has been removed.
There’s probably a way of being an a*hole in an exchange with people far smarter, knowledgeable, and morally superior to you without completely advertising your insufficiencies. But you can’t ever pull it off. Your reply is in no way consistent with, nor refutes, my post, and you have no clue that that’s the case.
60 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
NAILED it. People in line for decades in some cases to come here and these Dems act like they care about people. it’s complete horseshlt. MAGA has this under control. Done playin’
Except for the hotel and farm workers. Those illegals who cut the line can stay, without background checks, because Trump just said it’s ok.
This isn’t as cut and dried as you liberals pretend. There’s nuances to everything. Those are barely illegals, you’re referring to. Trump has understandably and carefully crafted his policy to account for this contingency status before the Easter event where Christian-Americans celebrate J. Christ’s return from the dead to the living.
21 -
Antwaan Runkin El wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
Except for the hotel and farm workers. Those illegals who cut the line can stay, without background checks, because Trump just said it’s ok.
This isn’t as cut and dried as you liberals pretend. There’s nuances to everything. Those are barely illegals, you’re referring to. Trump has understandably and carefully crafted his policy to account for this contingency status before the Easter event where Christian-Americans celebrate J. Christ’s return from the dead to the living.
I could go along with the farm connection to Easter, eggs and carrots and all. But hotels? Seems much more Christmas. Trump only gets half credit.
But yeah, he’s still a genius.
20 -
This quoted post has been removed.
Heavily redacted Epstein Files
Trump did that 👆
30 -
So you even read bro wrote:
This quoted post has been removed.
Heavily redacted Epstein Files
Trump did that 👆
That has nothing to do with Trump’s tariffs, which are antecedent to the alleged incident. The bottom line is America invented the smart phone so importation and alleged deficits are not a quantifiable issue per se. The problem is you liberals have been buying rigged deficit products like socks and cheap fvcking latex rubber sh!t that no real American even wants from the goddam Chinese who worship pagan gods at the expense of the Lord (J. Christ).
20 -
trump2028! wrote:
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
I don't know why aid to Ukraine and Israel was included in the border bill. Congress groups things together all the time. I imagine after the border bill was shot down, we continued to support Ukraine and Israel under Biden, and Israel under Trump. I don't think the Biden admin was ever worried about getting those aid packages passed if that's what you're implying. Senator McConnell was a big supporter of Ukraine.
My question is about 5,000 number. I am trying to work out exactly where it says that 5,000 people would be accepted per day. Anyway here's Gemini again:
The 5,000 Figure:
The 5,000-encounters-per-day figure was a significant point of discussion.
If the average number of daily encounters reached or exceeded 5,000 over a seven-day period, certain restrictive measures could be triggered.
These measures could include:
Suspending asylum processing.
Expedited removal of migrants.
Other border-control actions.
It's Not an Allowance:
It's crucial to understand that the bill did not authorize or allow 5,000 people to enter the country daily.
Instead, it established a trigger point that, when reached, would enable the DHS to impose stricter border-control policies.Back to me now. It doesn't seem like 5000 would be "allowed" per day. That's a very loose, mostly incorrect interpretation of the bill, from what I'm reading. It seems like 5k is a threshold which could trigger the shutdown of processing altogether. In other words, it's more complicated than that. Of course it is.
But rephrase it - 4,999 migrants or fewer per day won't trigger a shutdown. Thus it codifies 4,999 per day.
Is there a maximum per day now? If there isn’t, is it codified that an unlimited number of migrants can enter per day?
30 -
Antwaan Runkin El wrote:
hunter wheres the blow wrote:
I don't know why aid to Ukraine and Israel was included in the border bill. Congress groups things together all the time. I imagine after the border bill was shot down, we continued to support Ukraine and Israel under Biden, and Israel under Trump. I don't think the Biden admin was ever worried about getting those aid packages passed if that's what you're implying. Senator McConnell was a big supporter of Ukraine.
My question is about 5,000 number. I am trying to work out exactly where it says that 5,000 people would be accepted per day. Anyway here's Gemini again:
The 5,000 Figure:
The 5,000-encounters-per-day figure was a significant point of discussion.
If the average number of daily encounters reached or exceeded 5,000 over a seven-day period, certain restrictive measures could be triggered.
These measures could include:
Suspending asylum processing.
Expedited removal of migrants.
Other border-control actions.
It's Not an Allowance:
It's crucial to understand that the bill did not authorize or allow 5,000 people to enter the country daily.
Instead, it established a trigger point that, when reached, would enable the DHS to impose stricter border-control policies.Back to me now. It doesn't seem like 5000 would be "allowed" per day. That's a very loose, mostly incorrect interpretation of the bill, from what I'm reading. It seems like 5k is a threshold which could trigger the shutdown of processing altogether. In other words, it's more complicated than that. Of course it is.
Jesus Christ, we’re not looking for a dissertation here. Do you order Shrimp Louie at a truck stop too?
The facts are certified. We are well versed men here. And you would rather live in some Marxo-socialist paradise hobonobbing with the liberal elite oligarchy than benefit the hard working Christian-American common man that Trump has benefacted through pro -American port tariffs.
The bill is a dissertation. I don’t know how anyone could be expected to keep up with anything. It’s all a mess. I don’t know anything and I never will. Bernie 4 prez
10 -
King Amnesty 1 *will* be entertained on your dime. He gets richer while his partners get poorer. We are the marks.
A recap of Trump's multi-million dollar weekend on the taxpayer dime.
$3.4 million golf weekend to Mar-a-Lago (golf total now $33.8 million; he has played golf 28% of his days in office)
~$1 million evening trip to kick-fighting match in Miami, perhaps more.40
1 post was removed from this page.
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.