Good luck liberal loons: Federal debt explodes on 1st day of the new fiscal year, jumping $204 billion to new record of $35.669 trillion, but it gets worse: Treasury also had to draw down its cash balance by $72 billion - that's over $275 billion in the red FOR JUST ONE DAY:
So?
This post was edited 10 seconds after it was posted.
Did the worst AI system in the world create that sentence for you?
But don’t worry, it probably wasn’t 100% unintelligible. The “nonsense” at the end appears to be you pretending that Trump didn’t try to steal the election. He thanks you for your irrational allegiance, while laughing at you. You guys are really world class losers.
Keep cheering, lunatic. You are certifiably nuts, and AI not needed for that assessment.
I absolutely cheer any lawyer trying to put a criminal in prison. More power to him.
You know that you’re never going to get a pat on the head from Trump for being a loyal POS, right? Even if he was standing next to you, he wouldn’t waste his energy on it.
now we know why Mike Pence missed the debate last night.
“On December 28, CC2 CC5 and CC6 exchanged text messages in which expressed concern that Gohmert v. Pence-a lawsuit filed the day before that asserted CC2 that Pence had discretion to choose electoral votes during the certification proceeding would prompt a federal court to publicly reject, and thus preclude, the plan that the conspirators were advancing in private. 336 Thereafter, at 11:00 a.m. on January 1, the defendant called Pence to berate him because he had learned that Pence had filed a brief opposing the relief sought in Gohmert. 337 When Pence explained, as he had before, that he did not believe that he had the power under the Constitution to decide which votes to accept, the defendant told him that "hundreds of thousands" of people "are gonna hate your guts" and "people are gonna think you're stupid," and berated him pointedly, "You're too honest. "338 Immediately before the call, the defendant had spoken separately to CC1 (from 10:06 a.m. to 10:14 a.m.) and P1 (from 10:36 a.m. to 10:46 a.m.), and late that afternoon, the defendant spoke separately with P1 CC2 and p. 63”
Even the guys that cooked up the fake electors criminal scheme knew they were not alternate electors. They even called them fake!
oopsie!
“I just talked to the gentleman who did that memo, CC5 His idea is basically that all of us (GA, WI, AZ, PA, etc.) have our electors send in their votes (even though the votes aren't legal under federal law - because they're not signed by Governor); so that members of Congress can fight about whether they should be counted on January 6th. (They could potentially argue that they're not bound by federal law because they're Congress and make the law, etc.) Kind of wild/creative - I'm happy to discuss. My comment to him is that I guess there's no harm in it, (legally at least) – i.e. we would just be sending in "fake" electoral votes to Pence so that "someone" in Congress can make an objection when they start counting votes, and start arguing that the "fake" votes should be counted. 271”
The 2016 election that Trump won (yet most in your party refuse to acknowledge) had 10 faithless electors (the most since 1896) and more than 2020 (which had zero). The idea of fake electors is a new one, but would be much ado signifying nothing. At worst, it would be an act of civil disobedience, even less significant than casting a faithless elector vote (which could potentially sway an election). Unlike 2000, 2004 and 2016, no member of congress tried to block the certification, and no senator signed on as occurred in 2004. 2004 is the closest an election has ever come to being overturned.
The 2016 election that Trump won (yet most in your party refuse to acknowledge) had 10 faithless electors (the most since 1896) and more than 2020 (which had zero). The idea of fake electors is a new one, but would be much ado signifying nothing. At worst, it would be an act of civil disobedience, even less significant than casting a faithless elector vote (which could potentially sway an election). Unlike 2000, 2004 and 2016, no member of congress tried to block the certification, and no senator signed on as occurred in 2004. 2004 is the closest an election has ever come to being overturned.
I think that this election could set a recent record for faithless electors because of how Democrats handled their primary process. If Democrats had actually conducted a Democratic process, I highly doubt Kamala would be their nominee. A lot of the faithless elector ballots cast in 2016 were for Bernie (who had the nomination stolen from him by the DNC). It really is astounding how the DNC has abused the primary process the past three elections.
Good luck liberal loons: Federal debt explodes on 1st day of the new fiscal year, jumping $204 billion to new record of $35.669 trillion, but it gets worse: Treasury also had to draw down its cash balance by $72 billion - that's over $275 billion in the red FOR JUST ONE DAY:
So?
And that, my friends, is why Democrats cannot be trusted with the economy. Keynesian economics at its finest. Biden is running $2+ trillion annual deficits almost 4 years after the COVID emergency.
I think that this election could set a recent record for faithless electors because of how Democrats handled their primary process. If Democrats had actually conducted a Democratic process, I highly doubt Kamala would be their nominee. A lot of the faithless elector ballots cast in 2016 were for Bernie (who had the nomination stolen from him by the DNC). It really is astounding how the DNC has abused the primary process the past three elections.
KHarris received the votes of 99% of the delegates to the national convention--the only vote that actually determines the party's candidate.
And that, my friends, is why Democrats cannot be trusted with the economy. Keynesian economics at its finest. Biden is running $2+ trillion annual deficits almost 4 years after the COVID emergency.
And presumably that has nothing to do with Trump's 2017 tax cuts...
And that, my friends, is why Democrats cannot be trusted with the economy. Keynesian economics at its finest. Biden is running $2+ trillion annual deficits almost 4 years after the COVID emergency.
And how did the Rs do on that? Perhaps ran up deficits as well and went along with the Ds when they did it. STFU.
I think that this election could set a recent record for faithless electors because of how Democrats handled their primary process. If Democrats had actually conducted a Democratic process, I highly doubt Kamala would be their nominee. A lot of the faithless elector ballots cast in 2016 were for Bernie (who had the nomination stolen from him by the DNC). It really is astounding how the DNC has abused the primary process the past three elections.
KHarris received the votes of 99% of the delegates to the national convention--the only vote that actually determines the party's candidate.
Democracy at work.
Correct! If trumpers don't like the american system they can GTFO.
This post was edited 13 seconds after it was posted.
“By October 2020, P1 a private political advisor who had worked for the defendant's 2016 presidential campaign, began to assist with the defendant's re-election effort. Three days before election day, P1 described the defendant's plan to a private gathering of supporters: "And what Trump's going to do is just declare victory. Right? He's going to declare victory. That doesn't mean he's the winner, he's just going to say he's the winner."11 After explaining that Biden's supporters favored voting by mail, P1 stated further, "And so they're going to have a natural disadvantage and Trump's going to take advantage of it that's our strategy. He's going to declare himself a winner. "12 Immediately following election day on November 3, the defendant did exactly that. As his private and Campaign advisors had predicted to him, in certain states, the defendant took an early lead on election day that began to erode. At approximately 11:20 p.m., Fox News projected that Biden would prevail in the state of Arizona, and according to Campaign advisor P4 he and the defendant were shocked and angry at this development. 13 As election day turned to November 4, the contest was too close to project a winner, and in discussions about what the defendant should say publicly regarding the election, senior advisors suggested that the defendant should show restraint while counting continued. 14 Two private advisors, however, advocated a different course: CC1 and CC6 suggested that the defendant just declare victory. 15 And at about 2:20 a.m., the defendant gave televised remarks to a crowd of his campaign supporters in which he falsely”
Smith had absolutely no right to publish heresay that could affect the outcom of the election at this late date. This is continuing a governmental tradition of lying in the election cycle including Hunter in 2020 and Comey's election gaff in 2016.
Smith had absolutely no right to publish heresay that could affect the outcom of the election at this late date. This is continuing a governmental tradition of lying in the election cycle including Hunter in 2020 and Comey's election gaff in 2016.
Go cry to your right wing justices who forced this to happen.
Smith and his team wrote that at trial, they intended to show that, in some instances, Trump and his team “made up figures from whole cloth.”
In another instance, after an unidentified Trump aide, described only as a “campaign operative,” was told by a colleague at a Detroit, MI vote-counting center that they thought a batch of ballots would be in Biden’s favor, the operative said to “find a reason it isn’t.” “When the colleague suggested that there was about to be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers riot, a violent effort to stop the vote count in Florida after the 2000 presidential election,” the campaign operative “responded, ‘Make them riot!’ and ‘Do it!'”
