This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
Not true! Hybrid immunity from a booster showed significant improvements against later strains to make boosting even after infection worthwhile.
Later strains that were inconsequential in non-high risk people. Like Omicron which ended the pandemic. But, hey, as long as we can say it was a “net positive.” That’s the most important criterion.
Omicron that killed a few hundred thousand Americans. Of course they were all high-risk because they died. If only someone had told them.
Yeah, this I know. I’m simply saying that the FDA themselves defined who characterized high risk, since we keeping going in circles about who was and wasn’t high risk as far as vaccine eligibility. Remember, we can’t define it🙄. Pretty simple.
Had a non-high risk person achieved convalescence, especially during this period of Covid, then the boost was unnecessary, if a “net positive.” Do the CDC’s current recommendations indicate that it’s a “net positive?”
Ah of course. "High-risk" means people age 18 to 64 who are at high risk of severe COVID-19 or people over 65!
How could I have missed that! So clear!
Gosh dang, you will do anything to stay relevant and get the attention you so desperately desire. Ok, so, I’ll bite here…
Gee, I wonder if “at risk of severe Covid-19” means overweight or obese, having multiple comorbidities like diabetes, COPD, cystic fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, higher melanin skin and in a food desert???
“You are a scientist, damn it, and with all your years of schooling, you’ll be damned if you’re going to get owned by a peon who just picked up a “Microbiology for Dummies” paperback at Barnes & Noble and who’s just simply “lucky.””
Yeah, this I know. I’m simply saying that the FDA themselves defined who characterized high risk, since we keeping going in circles about who was and wasn’t high risk as far as vaccine eligibility. Remember, we can’t define it🙄. Pretty simple.
Had a non-high risk person achieved convalescence, especially during this period of Covid, then the boost was unnecessary, if a “net positive.” Do the CDC’s current recommendations indicate that it’s a “net positive?”
Ah of course. "High-risk" means people age 18 to 64 who are at high risk of severe COVID-19 or people over 65!
How could I have missed that! So clear!
Are you so fvcking stupid that you don’t understand Covid high-risk? 🤦♂️
Not true! Hybrid immunity from a booster showed significant improvements against later strains to make boosting even after infection worthwhile.
Later strains that were inconsequential in non-high risk people. Like Omicron which ended the pandemic. But, hey, as long as we can say it was a “net positive.” That’s the most important criterion.
Net positive calculation includes factoring in existing immunity and weaker strains (if valid).
Ah of course. "High-risk" means people age 18 to 64 who are at high risk of severe COVID-19 or people over 65!
How could I have missed that! So clear!
Gosh dang, you will do anything to stay relevant and get the attention you so desperately desire. Ok, so, I’ll bite here…
Gee, I wonder if “at risk of severe Covid-19” means overweight or obese, having multiple comorbidities like diabetes, COPD, cystic fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, higher melanin skin and in a food desert???
“You are a scientist, damn it, and with all your years of schooling, you’ll be damned if you’re going to get owned by a peon who just picked up a “Microbiology for Dummies” paperback at Barnes & Noble and who’s just simply “lucky.””
This is too much fun.
The COVID 3 shot series was recommended for everyone. Some of the current shorts have been too. Not sure what the point is beyond “the feds recommend shots to different people at different times” which.. doesn’t convince anyone of anything
Gosh dang, you will do anything to stay relevant and get the attention you so desperately desire. Ok, so, I’ll bite here…
Gee, I wonder if “at risk of severe Covid-19” means overweight or obese, having multiple comorbidities like diabetes, COPD, cystic fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, higher melanin skin and in a food desert???
“You are a scientist, damn it, and with all your years of schooling, you’ll be damned if you’re going to get owned by a peon who just picked up a “Microbiology for Dummies” paperback at Barnes & Noble and who’s just simply “lucky.””
This is too much fun.
The COVID 3 shot series was recommended for everyone. Some of the current shorts have been too. Not sure what the point is beyond “the feds recommend shots to different people at different times” which.. doesn’t convince anyone of anything
Amazing to watch these people pretend they didn’t gaslight anyone and are now interested in transparency.
Amazing to watch “Dr.” Birx admit the vaccines probably did cause (exacerbate?) some long Covid, vaccine injuries are probably far greater than the official statistics say, and vaccines should’ve been administered first to the most risky, elderly, nursing home patients, not younger health care workers, while also not answering whether some groups didn’t need to be vaccinated at all. Sound familiar?
These are the people you were supposed to trust. I wonder why everyone thinks they are FOS? Oh, but the source☝️The source sucks so none of this is credible🙄🤦♂️. Thank God for non-useful idiots.
Amazing to watch these people pretend they didn’t gaslight anyone and are now interested in transparency.
Amazing to watch “Dr.” Birx admit the vaccines probably did cause (exacerbate?) some long Covid, vaccine injuries are probably far greater than the official statistics say, and vaccines should’ve been administered first to the most risky, elderly, nursing home patients, not younger health care workers, while also not answering whether some groups didn’t need to be vaccinated at all. Sound familiar?
These are the people you were supposed to trust. I wonder why everyone thinks they are FOS? Oh, but the source☝️The source sucks so none of this is credible🙄🤦♂️. Thank God for non-useful idiots.
Listen to Birx after 4:00. She would not directly admit that most people did not need a Covid vax, but she tells us the high risk groups should have been prioritized. Instead, "We gave it to young nursing students".
She has been around politicians long enough to utilize their rhetorical methods when it suits her.
The truth continues to emerge one small nugget at a time.
Ah of course. "High-risk" means people age 18 to 64 who are at high risk of severe COVID-19 or people over 65!
How could I have missed that! So clear!
Gosh dang, you will do anything to stay relevant and get the attention you so desperately desire. Ok, so, I’ll bite here…
Gee, I wonder if “at risk of severe Covid-19” means overweight or obese, having multiple comorbidities like diabetes, COPD, cystic fibrosis, cardiovascular diseases, immunodeficiencies, higher melanin skin and in a food desert???
“You are a scientist, damn it, and with all your years of schooling, you’ll be damned if you’re going to get owned by a peon who just picked up a “Microbiology for Dummies” paperback at Barnes & Noble and who’s just simply “lucky.””
This is too much fun.
"High risk" is whatever you seem to be labeling such. I agree all the things you listed could make a respiratory infection worse; but you seem to think there is a some universal guidance that sorts people into "high risk" and "don't need vaccine."
Amazing to watch these people pretend they didn’t gaslight anyone and are now interested in transparency.
Amazing to watch “Dr.” Birx admit the vaccines probably did cause (exacerbate?) some long Covid, vaccine injuries are probably far greater than the official statistics say, and vaccines should’ve been administered first to the most risky, elderly, nursing home patients, not younger health care workers, while also not answering whether some groups didn’t need to be vaccinated at all. Sound familiar?
These are the people you were supposed to trust. I wonder why everyone thinks they are FOS? Oh, but the source☝️The source sucks so none of this is credible🙄🤦♂️. Thank God for non-useful idiots.
Listen to Birx after 4:00. She would not directly admit that most people did not need a Covid vax, but she tells us the high risk groups should have been prioritized. Instead, "We gave it to young nursing students".
She has been around politicians long enough to utilize their rhetorical methods when it suits her.
The truth continues to emerge one small nugget at a time.
Giving it to people exposed to a lot of virus in a healthcare setting makes sense. Probably would've been better to focus on 65+ ASAP but they got it what... a month after HCWs?
Hindsight is 20/20. We didn't understand the disease, infection, or mutation dynamics well enough in late 2020 - which is another whole problem.
Hindsight is 20/20. We didn't understand the disease, infection, or mutation dynamics well enough in late 2020 - which is another whole problem.
Despite that, you were able to hoodwink, frighten, threaten and coerce two-thirds of humanity into taking at least 1 injection of a chemical and biological formulation the overwhelming majority of them did not need.
Pfizer Inc. has agreed to settle more than 10,000 cases accusing it of hiding the cancer risks of its Zantac heartburn drug.
Note that 10,000 people isn't the total number of people damaged; it's just the number that joined in this lawsuit. The actual number could be much greater.
This is the same company (Pfizer) that made the vaccine that made Pfizer $40 billion/year in sales THAT YOU WERE TRUSTING WITH YOUR LIFE WHEN YOU TOOK THEIR mRNA VACCINE. How can you trust anything from this company?!
As of November 2023, Pfizer's $3.5 billion settlement in 2022 includes the largest criminal fine ever paid by a pharmaceutical company, at $1.3 billion. That's CRI. MI. NAL. Criminal! As in lied. As in fraud. As in people died.
How can you trust this company? I absolutely do not trust this company. I did not trust the vaccine when it was called "safe and effective." I was skeptical of the clinical trial. More and more people are trying to do 180s to rewrite their 2021 comments.
Pfizer Inc. has agreed to settle more than 10,000 cases accusing it of hiding the cancer risks of its Zantac heartburn drug.
Note that 10,000 people isn't the total number of people damaged; it's just the number that joined in this lawsuit. The actual number could be much greater.
This is the same company (Pfizer) that made the vaccine that made Pfizer $40 billion/year in sales THAT YOU WERE TRUSTING WITH YOUR LIFE WHEN YOU TOOK THEIR mRNA VACCINE. How can you trust anything from this company?!
As of November 2023, Pfizer's $3.5 billion settlement in 2022 includes the largest criminal fine ever paid by a pharmaceutical company, at $1.3 billion. That's CRI. MI. NAL. Criminal! As in lied. As in fraud. As in people died.
How can you trust this company? I absolutely do not trust this company. I did not trust the vaccine when it was called "safe and effective." I was skeptical of the clinical trial. More and more people are trying to do 180s to rewrite their 2021 comments.
Following the demise of a second Boeing whistleblower last week, Melissa McAtee, who leaked information about pharma giant Pfizer, posted a video on X to say she is 'not suicidal' and emphasising that the government and Big P...
In Colorado, more people continue to receive the COVID vaccine. Earlier this month, eligibility was opened to those K-12 teachers, school and child care staff and those 65 and older.
Amazing to watch these people pretend they didn’t gaslight anyone and are now interested in transparency.
Amazing to watch “Dr.” Birx admit the vaccines probably did cause (exacerbate?) some long Covid, vaccine injuries are probably far greater than the official statistics say, and vaccines should’ve been administered first to the most risky, elderly, nursing home patients, not younger health care workers, while also not answering whether some groups didn’t need to be vaccinated at all. Sound familiar?
These are the people you were supposed to trust. I wonder why everyone thinks they are FOS? Oh, but the source☝️The source sucks so none of this is credible🙄🤦♂️. Thank God for non-useful idiots.
Listen to Birx after 4:00. She would not directly admit that most people did not need a Covid vax, but she tells us the high risk groups should have been prioritized. Instead, "We gave it to young nursing students".
She has been around politicians long enough to utilize their rhetorical methods when it suits her.
The truth continues to emerge one small nugget at a time.
The last people who should take the jab are the high risk groups
Hindsight is 20/20. We didn't understand the disease, infection, or mutation dynamics well enough in late 2020 - which is another whole problem.
Despite that, you were able to hoodwink, frighten, threaten and coerce two-thirds of humanity into taking at least 1 injection of a chemical and biological formulation the overwhelming majority of them did not need.
Congratulations.
Dan, I know this is terrifying, but everyone chose to get the vaccine because they knew it would help them. Deep breaths, it's gonna be ok.
