Kamala had the questions sent to her before the debate. She had friendly moderators, (one of which was a sorority sister) they refused to fact check her, never asked her follow-up questions. It was 3 vs 1 the entire night
The moderators went easy on Trump. He lied about 30 times; they fact-checked him maybe 4 times. Think about how bad it would have been for him if the moderators actually did their jobs.
Which is why Trump is scared to debate her again - a second debate will likely be worse for him than the first debate.
As has been stated over and over, the debate questions were a surprise to no one. Harris prepared and played Trump like a fiddle.
Harris said Trump admires dictators and is easily manipulated by their praise. Trump responded by talking about Orban being a great leader and saying Trump was a great President.
Harris said Trump lies and drives division. Trump talked about immigrants eating pets. The moderators said that was not true because it was and is not true. This is still the story of the debate and he keeps doubling down on that lie as if saying more will make it come true.
Trumplandia refuses to believe their own eyes and ears. Trump is raving like a lunatic daily and it showed bigly in the debate.
Newmens and Women For Trump and any other names - are you guys going to follow up on this? It's been two days. What parts of the Indictment are "sham" or "BS"? Why are they "sham" and "BS" or any other descriptor? Can you guys elaborate on your very broad, conclusory opinions at all?
I'm starting to think you aren't serious posters the way you just say uninformed things and just run away when questioned about your opinions.
Here's the Indictment again in case you can't find it:
Geez. We are back to this IQ stuff. That line of attack has a lot more to do with the low IQ of the attacker. It also seems to be a racist attack too, so easy to see how it appeals to Trumplandia.
Sally's a bona fide racist, drunk, azzhole, only here to spread disinformation.
He's a dinosaur that's angry the world is moving forward without him.
The only racist is you. No one ever brought up race except you. If Kamala's parents were chinese and she was a male - there is a good chance her height would be around 5'8". Kamala's parents come from Jamaica and India where the average IQ is around 75. Nothing wrong with that. If her parents were from Japan I would estimate her IQ to be around 112. What don't you understand about that?
What premise? What sham? Can you elaborate and point me to paragraphs of the Indictment that you think are a sham?
You know it's a sham. If Trump were a Democrat, or if he weren't running for president, the NYC charges never would have happened.
No, I don't know that it's a sham. I'm asking you what paragraphs of Indictments do you consider a sham and why? What is false or erroneous or shamful about them? Can you elaborate on your opinion at all?
By the way, the New York state charges have nothing to do with the federal Indictment. You seem confused on that. They are two completely different cases.
Harris is not intelligent. It is just so obvious. She was chosen to be president by a power broker in South Carolina who got Biden to promise to nominate a black woman as his running mate to win the South Carolina primary. We are just lucky we didn't get Fani Willis or Staci Abrams or Kentanji Brown or Ilhan Omar for that matter. If she manages to win by hook or by crook she will be one of the least qualified presidents ever.
The only racist is you. No one ever brought up race except you. If Kamala's parents were chinese and she was a male - there is a good chance her height would be around 5'8". Kamala's parents come from Jamaica and India where the average IQ is around 75. Nothing wrong with that. If her parents were from Japan I would estimate her IQ to be around 112. What don't you understand about that?
Do you realize that Indian people living in the US have an average IQ (102 or 112, depending on your source) that is higher than that of the average american? Besides, there is no need to "estimate" her IQ. She has passed several competitive exams, including the California BAR, and graduated from respectable institutions. She is intelligent enough to be president of the US.
The moderators went easy on Trump. He lied about 30 times; they fact-checked him maybe 4 times. Think about how bad it would have been for him if the moderators actually did their jobs.
Which is why Trump is scared to debate her again - a second debate will likely be worse for him than the first debate.
When has the winner of anything ever asked for a rematch? If you win at something, you only stand to lose in a rematch.
...or the crazy way they are going on all TV stations to say 'Harris has no policy', but whenever Trump is asked for policy or to actually explain something like decreasing inflation etc, he goes off on a rant about how bad everybody else is, complete word salads, never addresses any point because he has 'nothing up there'.
Quite sad really that half of Americans still want the bloke to lead them
You know it's a sham. If Trump were a Democrat, or if he weren't running for president, the NYC charges never would have happened.
No, I don't know that it's a sham. I'm asking you what paragraphs of Indictments do you consider a sham and why? What is false or erroneous or shamful about them? Can you elaborate on your opinion at all?
By the way, the New York state charges have nothing to do with the federal Indictment. You seem confused on that. They are two completely different cases.
