Charlie Kirk killed at campus event in Utah

You Reap what you Sow wrote:

The Wizard of Awe wrote:

GUNS, too many of them and too many people who shouldn't have access to them.

Vegas, Sandy Hook, Columbine, Theater, UVA, Buffalo, Tyler and on and on. Men + Guns. Until a certain set of our society admits their too many guns and too many guns in the wrong hands this will continue to happen. Are you in support of red flags laws? The ideology and motivation for people with scrambled brains won't help beforehand unless effective red flags laws exist and guns are hard too access in general.

Is that blood on your hands btw...

There's over 400 million guns in circulation and yet only a handful of animals choose to use them this way.

Blaming guns is silly.

Even if you got your wish and they were banned the criminals would still have access to them.

Look at Australia. The only places gun bans work are countries that didn't have hardly any guns to begin with.

You Reap what you Sow wrote:

Jeff Wigand wrote:

That children rape victims should be forced to carry pregnancies to term

That MLK Jr was a bad person

That the Civil Rights Act of 1965 should never have been passed

That empathy is bad

That “black women do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."

He doubted that Black people were generally qualified to do their jobs

He endorsed Leviticus’ prescribed stoning for gay sex as “perfect”

As much as I find all the detestable, Charlie Kirk was a living, breathing human and it’s a tragedy how his life ended and I’m extremely sorry for his family and loved ones.

Context matters.

Child rape the position is that murdering the baby is just righting a wrong with another wrong. I don't agree with him but it's not an "abhorrent" position.

MLK Jr. was a very flawed man. He witnessed a rape and encouraged the rapist. He was an adulterer... Thinking that makes him a bad guy isn't "abhorrent". You literally think the founding fathers were all evil because they had slaves. You could make an effort to be at least remotely intellectually honest.

Saying the Civil Rights Act shouldn't have been passed does not mean that Jim Crow and all the Democrat racism was preferable. The position is that the act was flawed and some of it's terrible provisions resulted in the complete destruction of the black family which is undeniable.

Empathy alone guiding policy is a very bad thing. If you disagree start feeding stray cats from your porch and see how that works out for you.

Kirk was anti-DEI but that quote sounds like something you made up or got from someone else who made it up. DEI is racist and damages the person being unfairly rewarded and the person being punished for their immutable characteristics.

DEI creates the doubt because it literally ignores merit.

The leviticus thing was in response to a non-believer trying to pluck verses a la carte out of the Bible. Kirk didn't make the law the Bible did...

You have absolutely no understanding of the context in a single example.

I find that abhorrent.

You Reap what you Sow wrote:

Jeff Wigand wrote:

That children rape victims should be forced to carry pregnancies to term

That MLK Jr was a bad person

That the Civil Rights Act of 1965 should never have been passed

That empathy is bad

That “black women do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."

He doubted that Black people were generally qualified to do their jobs

He endorsed Leviticus’ prescribed stoning for gay sex as “perfect”

As much as I find all the detestable, Charlie Kirk was a living, breathing human and it’s a tragedy how his life ended and I’m extremely sorry for his family and loved ones.

Context matters.

Child rape the position is that murdering the baby is just righting a wrong with another wrong. I don't agree with him but it's not an "abhorrent" position.

MLK Jr. was a very flawed man. He witnessed a rape and encouraged the rapist. He was an adulterer... Thinking that makes him a bad guy isn't "abhorrent". You literally think the founding fathers were all evil because they had slaves. You could make an effort to be at least remotely intellectually honest.

Saying the Civil Rights Act shouldn't have been passed does not mean that Jim Crow and all the Democrat racism was preferable. The position is that the act was flawed and some of it's terrible provisions resulted in the complete destruction of the black family which is undeniable.

Empathy alone guiding policy is a very bad thing. If you disagree start feeding stray cats from your porch and see how that works out for you.

Kirk was anti-DEI but that quote sounds like something you made up or got from someone else who made it up. DEI is racist and damages the person being unfairly rewarded and the person being punished for their immutable characteristics.

DEI creates the doubt because it literally ignores merit.

The leviticus thing was in response to a non-believer trying to pluck verses a la carte out of the Bible. Kirk didn't make the law the Bible did...

You have absolutely no understanding of the context in a single example.

I find that abhorrent.

Finally sum Truth 2 wrote:

You Reap what you Sow wrote:

Context matters.

Child rape the position is that murdering the baby is just righting a wrong with another wrong. I don't agree with him but it's not an "abhorrent" position.

MLK Jr. was a very flawed man. He witnessed a rape and encouraged the rapist. He was an adulterer... Thinking that makes him a bad guy isn't "abhorrent". You literally think the founding fathers were all evil because they had slaves. You could make an effort to be at least remotely intellectually honest.

Saying the Civil Rights Act shouldn't have been passed does not mean that Jim Crow and all the Democrat racism was preferable. The position is that the act was flawed and some of it's terrible provisions resulted in the complete destruction of the black family which is undeniable.

Empathy alone guiding policy is a very bad thing. If you disagree start feeding stray cats from your porch and see how that works out for you.

Kirk was anti-DEI but that quote sounds like something you made up or got from someone else who made it up. DEI is racist and damages the person being unfairly rewarded and the person being punished for their immutable characteristics.

DEI creates the doubt because it literally ignores merit.

The leviticus thing was in response to a non-believer trying to pluck verses a la carte out of the Bible. Kirk didn't make the law the Bible did...

You have absolutely no understanding of the context in a single example.

I find that abhorrent.

Why don't the so called educated, educate themselves before lashing out? Is their tribal bond too strong for seeking the truth?

Jeff Wigand wrote:

You Reap what you Sow wrote:

Context matters.

Child rape the position is that murdering the baby is just righting a wrong with another wrong. I don't agree with him but it's not an "abhorrent" position.

MLK Jr. was a very flawed man. He witnessed a rape and encouraged the rapist. He was an adulterer... Thinking that makes him a bad guy isn't "abhorrent". You literally think the founding fathers were all evil because they had slaves. You could make an effort to be at least remotely intellectually honest.

Saying the Civil Rights Act shouldn't have been passed does not mean that Jim Crow and all the Democrat racism was preferable. The position is that the act was flawed and some of it's terrible provisions resulted in the complete destruction of the black family which is undeniable.

Empathy alone guiding policy is a very bad thing. If you disagree start feeding stray cats from your porch and see how that works out for you.

Kirk was anti-DEI but that quote sounds like something you made up or got from someone else who made it up. DEI is racist and damages the person being unfairly rewarded and the person being punished for their immutable characteristics.

DEI creates the doubt because it literally ignores merit.

The leviticus thing was in response to a non-believer trying to pluck verses a la carte out of the Bible. Kirk didn't make the law the Bible did...

You have absolutely no understanding of the context in a single example.

I find that abhorrent.

I think you make a lot of mental gymnastics to try to justify any of it.

A building is on fire and is about to collapse. In one room, you have six month old toddler. In another, there are 20 frozen embryos. You only have time clear one of the rooms before the roof comes down. Most people would prioritize the living, breathing child over the 20 frozen embryos. Maybe you and Kirk wouldn’t have.

The MLK rape claim is entirely BS

Link:www.usfca.edu/news/jones-response-garr...

He definitely stepped out on Coretta but if that’s disqualifying you’re going to hate what I have to tell you about our current President.

The Civil Rights Act was monumental in putting Jim Crow behind us.

Empathy is also fixing the stray cats.

Kirk said it immediately after that plane landing at Reagan was struck by a helicopter and he assumed that underqualified pilots were to blame.

Bronze age laws aren’t generally compatible with modernity.

Back to topic: I couldn’t have disagreed more with Kirk but I’m very sorry for what happened.