Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, who led an audit of the 2020 election in his state, testified that the election was so corrupt that the state legislature should “take a...
If Meadows never lived at the Scaly Mountain location, he could be in potential violation of the state's abode test for voter registration, which requires people to have spent at least one night in the location they are registering to vote without the immediate intent to establish a domicile in another location.
Peters is a nationally known promoter of debunked election fraud conspiracies and a Republican candidate for secretary of state, the Colorado office that oversees elections.
BREAKING: Tina Peters, Mesa County Colorado clerk indicted on 11 counts of election tampering and official misconduct for stealing vote data and leaking it to pro-Trump conspiracy theorists. This case may also involve Sheronna Bishop, who was campaign manager to Lauren Boebert.
BREAKING: Tina Peters, Mesa County Colorado clerk indicted on 11 counts of election tampering and official misconduct for stealing vote data and leaking it to pro-Trump conspiracy theorists. This case may also involve Sheronna Bishop, who was campaign manager to Lauren Boebert.
The best part of this in my eyes. Indicted for election tampering but she is running for secretary of state so she can (her words) "oversee elections."
BREAKING: Tina Peters, Mesa County Colorado clerk indicted on 11 counts of election tampering and official misconduct for stealing vote data and leaking it to pro-Trump conspiracy theorists. This case may also involve Sheronna Bishop, who was campaign manager to Lauren Boebert.
So you agree that there was fraud and that all possible sources of fraud should be thoroughly investigated? 🤔
Convenient that the radical left is invested in election fraud when it served their interests.
So you agree that there was fraud and that all possible sources of fraud should be thoroughly investigated? 🤔
Convenient that the radical left is invested in election fraud when it served their interests.
Or maybe it's that election fraud is committed mostly by the party that brought us the most turd-like POTUS who actively tired to illegally overturn a free and fair presidential election.
I am sure you would agree that the investigations in Wi and Az are fraudulently in nature as they were funded and performed by partisan groups that had a specific outcome in mind prior to performing the audits.
Public records show the former Trump chief of staff registered in two states and, according to The New Yorker, registered at a home that he never owned and possibly never visited.
WHY PA IS A TRUMP LANDSLIDE 1 OF 3 Now that I'm en route the other coast, to PA, I've revamped my three-step trend slide to show why PA is an easy Trump slam dunk.
2004 - close race, less than 3% margin for Kerry. Bush stronger with working class.
2008 - Obama blowout, as seen nationwide. Soft center, unions, minorities with strong support. 10% win largest for Dems since LBJ 1964.
2012 - Romney gains are minimal, but Obama nosedives by 300,000 votes, cutting margin to 5%. Regristration trend was 1% in favor of GOP, but because Dems lost more than GOP did. Squish Romney couldn't flip enough blue collars.
2016 - Strong GOP registration surge (3% in GOP direction) forecasts Trump win of 44,000 votes.
PA 2 of 3 If Trump is to lose PA, we will see the registration trend move back toward Dems. Instead, it is a 21 to 1 ratio for net new registrations for the Trump-led GOP in a state that he already won. 242k net new GOP registrations statewide, just 11 net new Dem. 60 counties trend more Republican out of 67 in registration. Now here is a gain of 407,000 Trump votes in 2020, with Dems having lost votes in huge numbers the last two cycles. This is looking like... well... kind of what you saw on election night. Hundreds of thousands of votes.
PA 3 of 3 But wait... let's count votes for 3 days... and find a pickup of 532k new votes, eclipsing the Obama blowout record with a record GOP number on the books... in a state losing population in most counties. Got it...
WHY PA IS A TRUMP LANDSLIDE by Captain K. Seth posted an excellent 3 part series on the 2020 Pennsylvania election results. - Part I - Part II - Part III We attached an image of an aggressive, yet realistic estimate of the real Democrat vote, which could have been as low as 2,518,000 votes. If this number is true, then there would be over 943,000 fake Democrat votes in Pennsylvania. Please take the time to carefully read Seth's 3 part series. The commentary is excellent. NOTE: As Seth pointed out the Democrats Vote Increase (DVI) in 2020 was over 532,000. However, this does NOT equal the number of fake votes. ⚠️ The number of fake votes is nearly DOUBLE that amount. (i.e. close to 943,000 votes.)
A little "backup" to my friend Captain Keshel's Pennsylvania info he is posting today... according to Edison (which we know was involved in the scheme) it took until 8:49 AM on the 6th for Biden to have more votes than Trump. A scant 12 hours earlier, Trump had been up by nearly 60,000 votes.
Coincidentally, it took until 5:01PM on the 6th for them to "find" enough Biden votes to put Biden in the "lead". 24 hours before Trump had been up by about 14,000 votes
PA was stolen from Trump.
Keshel has done a deep dive into the disputed states such as AZ, WI and MI too.
A little "backup" to my friend Captain Keshel's Pennsylvania info he is posting today... according to Edison (which we know was involved in the scheme) it took until 8:49 AM on the 6th for Biden to have more votes than Trump. A scant 12 hours earlier, Trump had been up by nearly 60,000 votes.
Coincidentally, it took until 5:01PM on the 6th for them to "find" enough Biden votes to put Biden in the "lead". 24 hours before Trump had been up by about 14,000 votes
PA was stolen from Trump.
Keshel has done a deep dive into the disputed states such as AZ, WI and MI too.
Keshel also did a deep dive into GA as well. All of these states were stolen from Trump.
To prevent the 2020 fraud from happening again, this must happen in EVERY state:
1. No election management machines (i.e. Dominion, etc) Paper ballots, hand counted. I don't care if thats a lot of votes. Work the problem.
2. No mail-in ballots except for verifiable travel and sickness. And military of course.
3. Election auditors present at ALL times sitting next to counters. No kicking them out at midnight, pulling out boxes full of ballots under tables after hours, etc.
WHY PA IS A TRUMP LANDSLIDE 1 OF 3 Now that I'm en route the other coast, to PA, I've revamped my three-step trend slide to show why PA is an easy Trump slam dunk.
2004 - close race, less than 3% margin for Kerry. Bush stronger with working class.
2008 - Obama blowout, as seen nationwide. Soft center, unions, minorities with strong support. 10% win largest for Dems since LBJ 1964.
2012 - Romney gains are minimal, but Obama nosedives by 300,000 votes, cutting margin to 5%. Regristration trend was 1% in favor of GOP, but because Dems lost more than GOP did. Squish Romney couldn't flip enough blue collars.
2016 - Strong GOP registration surge (3% in GOP direction) forecasts Trump win of 44,000 votes.
PA 2 of 3 If Trump is to lose PA, we will see the registration trend move back toward Dems. Instead, it is a 21 to 1 ratio for net new registrations for the Trump-led GOP in a state that he already won. 242k net new GOP registrations statewide, just 11 net new Dem. 60 counties trend more Republican out of 67 in registration. Now here is a gain of 407,000 Trump votes in 2020, with Dems having lost votes in huge numbers the last two cycles. This is looking like... well... kind of what you saw on election night. Hundreds of thousands of votes.
PA 3 of 3 But wait... let's count votes for 3 days... and find a pickup of 532k new votes, eclipsing the Obama blowout record with a record GOP number on the books... in a state losing population in most counties. Got it...
WHY PA IS A TRUMP LANDSLIDE by Captain K. Seth posted an excellent 3 part series on the 2020 Pennsylvania election results. - Part I - Part II - Part III We attached an image of an aggressive, yet realistic estimate of the real Democrat vote, which could have been as low as 2,518,000 votes. If this number is true, then there would be over 943,000 fake Democrat votes in Pennsylvania. Please take the time to carefully read Seth's 3 part series. The commentary is excellent. NOTE: As Seth pointed out the Democrats Vote Increase (DVI) in 2020 was over 532,000. However, this does NOT equal the number of fake votes. ⚠️ The number of fake votes is nearly DOUBLE that amount. (i.e. close to 943,000 votes.)
More info on next post....
That's pretty weak. He just invents a number of fake votes without any proof that they are fake votes.
It is a fact that in some elections voters on one side are more motivated than in other elections. And in some elections people get off their ass to vote even thought they often don't vote.
Why is it that none of the accusations about fake votes and tampered machines are never backed by evidence (and I'm ignoring affidavits that state that the affiant was told by a third person that something suspicious may have happened, because courts correctly will ignore those affidavits)?
