Fat hurts wrote:
have you apologized wrote:
Simple question: Have you apologized for any of the times nothing was found by republicans on Hillary?
No need to apologize because the investigation isn't over. Trey Gowdy is retiring from congress so he can investigate Benghazi full time.
Dude, the Benghazi investigation was over a LONG time ago. Guess what? They found NOTHING.
Fat hurts wrote:
No need to apologize because the investigation isn't over. Trey Gowdy is retiring from congress so he can investigate Benghazi full time.
And, he will use his own money to do so. Fame and fortune await him once he is out.
have you apologized wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
Hey pop, flag, eric and the rest.....Are we all gonna get a big apology when Mueller finds no Russian collusion?
If not, you guys are gonna have to post incognito out of pure embarrassment....
Simple question: Have you apologized for any of the times nothing was found by republicans on Hillary?
Those times don't count. Hillary was given a free pass because she is a member of the DEEP STATE and you know it!
have you apologized wrote:
truthseakr wrote:
Hey pop, flag, eric and the rest.....Are we all gonna get a big apology when Mueller finds no Russian collusion?
If not, you guys are gonna have to post incognito out of pure embarrassment....
Simple question: Have you apologized for any of the times nothing was found by republicans on Hillary?
I have never promoted the Hilary probes but you and your lackeys have incessantly schilled the Mueller investigation...A simple heartfelt apology will suffice for me...You don't have to get on your knees or anything.
News flashed wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
No need to apologize because the investigation isn't over. Trey Gowdy is retiring from congress so he can investigate Benghazi full time.
Dude, the Benghazi investigation was over a LONG time ago. Guess what? They found NOTHING.
It's never over. Trey will find the truth. The truth is out there.
Fat hurts wrote:
News flashed wrote:
Dude, the Benghazi investigation was over a LONG time ago. Guess what? They found NOTHING.
It's never over. Trey will find the truth. The truth is out there.
It’s over stupid. Now you and your friends go and try to spin it like Trump is some innocent little flower.
So more for his call for unity and working together from his SOTU speech. Guess those were just empty words.
Definitely the best words, though!
Wonder when he is gonna testify under oath to Mueller.
Wonder when he is gonna release his tax returns.
If he can give a truthful testimony and his tax returns were clean that would do a lot of damage to the so called "witch hunt." Not sure why he hasn't done this yet, it would sure make the liberals look stupid.
*So much
Jeeze another bad day on wall street. Thanks a lot Trump!!!!
Erfworm wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bipartisan-immigration-bill-surfaces-trump-knocks-it-down/ar-BBIJfFh?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntpSo more for his call for unity and working together from his SOTU speech. Guess those were just empty words.
Definitely the best words, though!
Wonder when he is gonna testify under oath to Mueller.
Wonder when he is gonna release his tax returns.
If he can give a truthful testimony and his tax returns were clean that would do a lot of damage to the so called "witch hunt." Not sure why he hasn't done this yet, it would sure make the liberals look stupid.
Did you even read that ‘bill’?
Looks like Clinton and Trump May become roomies.
This is much worse that the bogus Clinton Email issue—where Anthony Weiner was downloading his wife' email to see if she was onto his sexting little girls. Trump's team is intentionally hiding internal correspondence in violation of the federal records laws.
Some participants at the ethics sessions in the Old Executive Office Building said Passantino suggested that there had been inappropriate use of smartphone apps such as WhatsApp.
“He did focus on WhatsApp — said that people were using it, and it wasn’t appropriate,” said one staffer who attended a recent briefing and requested anonymity to describe the discussion. “He said, ‘All those apps are a big problem.’ ”
Reader of things wrote:
Erfworm wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bipartisan-immigration-bill-surfaces-trump-knocks-it-down/ar-BBIJfFh?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntpSo more for his call for unity and working together from his SOTU speech. Guess those were just empty words.
Definitely the best words, though!
Wonder when he is gonna testify under oath to Mueller.
Wonder when he is gonna release his tax returns.
If he can give a truthful testimony and his tax returns were clean that would do a lot of damage to the so called "witch hunt." Not sure why he hasn't done this yet, it would sure make the liberals look stupid.
Did you even read that ‘bill’?
I don't know if they exact bill is available for reading. If it is I have not seen a link to it and if you can provide one that would be great. From this article and a few others I have read it seems to reach some middle ground by providing a pathway for citizenship for dreamers in exchange for increased border control funding. Trump does not like it because it doesn't provide funding directly for a wall.
I thought Mexico was going to be paying for the wall.
Also, did you have any thoughts/comments on anything else from my above post with the link?
News flashed wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
It's never over. Trey will find the truth. The truth is out there.
It’s over stupid. Now you and your friends go and try to spin it like Trump is some innocent little flower.
It's never going to be over stupid. Trey is even teaching his grandchildren how to investigate Benghazi. Mark my words. Hillary will be indicted by 2045.
inst wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Brother, you are barking up the wrong tree here. I think perhaps you are trolling me, and if so, good show, but you aren't telling me anything I don't know or don't do. I won't comment to you anymore on this topic as you aren't providing me anything of value. I am a stock market guru, and most people here know that, so it's obvious to them that my "Thanks Trump!" comment was a joke.
Oh, I didn't realize I was talking to a "stock market guru." I come across you guys a lot. Think you can time the market, know exactly when it's going to go up or down, when to pull your money out or put it back in. Let me guess, you don't own any index funds because you are a"guru" and are invested in only individual stocks. Bad idea. With the right investment mixture over a decent period of time, you could live comfortably just off dividends - never even having to touch your assets in the market.
-Jason
I said I wouldn't comment any more to you, but you are at least a little fun, so I will.
I do not time the market. I started putting money in the market after college in 1989. My wife and I invested half our income for the first 7 years of our marriage, and then I have averaged putting in over 20% annually since then. We did the 50% initially because we were in an area of the country where we did not want to buy a house, so we sunk as much as we could afford into retirement accounts.
I do not own any individual stocks. My money is all in diversified mutual funds both in an out of retirement vehicles. For a while after age 35, I had some money in bonds in addition to the stocks in those mutual funds, but I have since removed bonds altogether. I did this after paying off the house and then building up an emergency fund of 3 years of expenses (well, it's a little over 2.5 years now, but it will be at 3 years by summer). I plan to keep it at this level or even a little higher after I retire as a safety net if the market drops a lot...I will then pay bills with that money and let the invested money sit and recover. The money is in a MMA, but it is there as insurance, not to make more money.
I am in my early 50s, I own my house outright and have no other debt, so I am completely debt free. I have enough money saved/invested so that I could retire right now if I wanted to, but I will likely wait until age 55 at the earliest or just start to pare back my clients then so that I am no longer working full-time then. I plan to not work at all after age 59 1/2 and very likely before that. I own my own business, so I can take on clients or not at my whim. I will have far more income in retirement than I do now simply because of all the investing and staying in the market that I have done since 1989.
So, methinks you are likely a troll, but if not, you definitely have me labeled incorrectly. You won't be fun too much longer, so if you decide to respond, you'd better make it fun, or I likely will ignore you.
The Deep State has now resorted to playing games with the stock market in order to make Trump look bad. They will stop at nothing to bring him down.
The Conspiracy Runs Deeper Than You Know wrote:
The Deep State has now resorted to playing games with the stock market in order to make Trump look bad. They will stop at nothing to bring him down.
It's fun. He is such a buffoon.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole wrote:
inst wrote:
Oh, I didn't realize I was talking to a "stock market guru." I come across you guys a lot. Think you can time the market, know exactly when it's going to go up or down, when to pull your money out or put it back in. Let me guess, you don't own any index funds because you are a"guru" and are invested in only individual stocks. Bad idea. With the right investment mixture over a decent period of time, you could live comfortably just off dividends - never even having to touch your assets in the market.
-Jason
I said I wouldn't comment any more to you, but you are at least a little fun, so I will.
I do not time the market. I started putting money in the market after college in 1989. My wife and I invested half our income for the first 7 years of our marriage, and then I have averaged putting in over 20% annually since then. We did the 50% initially because we were in an area of the country where we did not want to buy a house, so we sunk as much as we could afford into retirement accounts.
I do not own any individual stocks. My money is all in diversified mutual funds both in an out of retirement vehicles. For a while after age 35, I had some money in bonds in addition to the stocks in those mutual funds, but I have since removed bonds altogether. I did this after paying off the house and then building up an emergency fund of 3 years of expenses (well, it's a little over 2.5 years now, but it will be at 3 years by summer). I plan to keep it at this level or even a little higher after I retire as a safety net if the market drops a lot...I will then pay bills with that money and let the invested money sit and recover. The money is in a MMA, but it is there as insurance, not to make more money.
I am in my early 50s, I own my house outright and have no other debt, so I am completely debt free. I have enough money saved/invested so that I could retire right now if I wanted to, but I will likely wait until age 55 at the earliest or just start to pare back my clients then so that I am no longer working full-time then. I plan to not work at all after age 59 1/2 and very likely before that. I own my own business, so I can take on clients or not at my whim. I will have far more income in retirement than I do now simply because of all the investing and staying in the market that I have done since 1989.
So, methinks you are likely a troll, but if not, you definitely have me labeled incorrectly. You won't be fun too much longer, so if you decide to respond, you'd better make it fun, or I likely will ignore you.
You can thank trump for your financial blessings, especially today's ;)
inst wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Brother, you are barking up the wrong tree here. I think perhaps you are trolling me, and if so, good show, but you aren't telling me anything I don't know or don't do. I won't comment to you anymore on this topic as you aren't providing me anything of value. I am a stock market guru, and most people here know that, so it's obvious to them that my "Thanks Trump!" comment was a joke.
Oh, I didn't realize I was talking to a "stock market guru." I come across you guys a lot. Think you can time the market, know exactly when it's going to go up or down, when to pull your money out or put it back in. Let me guess, you don't own any index funds because you are a"guru" and are invested in only individual stocks. Bad idea. With the right investment mixture over a decent period of time, you could live comfortably just off dividends - never even having to touch your assets in the market.
-Jason
The guru's portfolio is probably very diversified.
He owns Google, Apple, AND Amazon.
Trollminator wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I said I wouldn't comment any more to you, but you are at least a little fun, so I will.
I do not time the market. I started putting money in the market after college in 1989. My wife and I invested half our income for the first 7 years of our marriage, and then I have averaged putting in over 20% annually since then. We did the 50% initially because we were in an area of the country where we did not want to buy a house, so we sunk as much as we could afford into retirement accounts.
I do not own any individual stocks. My money is all in diversified mutual funds both in an out of retirement vehicles. For a while after age 35, I had some money in bonds in addition to the stocks in those mutual funds, but I have since removed bonds altogether. I did this after paying off the house and then building up an emergency fund of 3 years of expenses (well, it's a little over 2.5 years now, but it will be at 3 years by summer). I plan to keep it at this level or even a little higher after I retire as a safety net if the market drops a lot...I will then pay bills with that money and let the invested money sit and recover. The money is in a MMA, but it is there as insurance, not to make more money.
I am in my early 50s, I own my house outright and have no other debt, so I am completely debt free. I have enough money saved/invested so that I could retire right now if I wanted to, but I will likely wait until age 55 at the earliest or just start to pare back my clients then so that I am no longer working full-time then. I plan to not work at all after age 59 1/2 and very likely before that. I own my own business, so I can take on clients or not at my whim. I will have far more income in retirement than I do now simply because of all the investing and staying in the market that I have done since 1989.
So, methinks you are likely a troll, but if not, you definitely have me labeled incorrectly. You won't be fun too much longer, so if you decide to respond, you'd better make it fun, or I likely will ignore you.
You can thank trump for your financial blessings, especially today's ;)
I lost over $90K today (on paper).
Thanks Trump.