Stop preening and explain why you think a .55 P value means there's any correlation at all proven in that study.
Then explain why you think the 2nd study which doesn't even attempt to prove correlation supports your claim in any way.
You are the one claiming I don't understand the study and that the P value is "bad". The burden is on you to back up your claims. What "correlation" are you even talking about?
Your initial claim was that a healthy 25 year old did not need to get vaccinated for COVID. Here's two studies showing that hundreds of people in their 20s and 30s with no pre-existing conditions died after getting COVID.
Don't get me wrong, there are like 20 different shortcomings of the manuscripts that I wouldn't have let past if I were peer-reviewing them. But, you haven't identified any of them. Instead you tried to argue that all of the people had pre-existing conditions and didn't know about them. Now you're trying to argue about a P value that you don't understand.
I'm asking you to be specific in your criticisms. People could maybe take you seriously then. When all you do is cast about generalities and insults nobody takes you seriously.
If you had any idea what a P value was you wouldn't be preening about trying to defend a .55.
There were 239,952 COVID cases in the age group.
1488 deaths.
72,768 comorbidities are counted.
How many of those 1488 deaths had zero comorbidities in the study?
To work in the federal government Trump wants you to believe and regurgitate the big lie for him. He wants all to rewrite history and whitewash Trump's traitorous actions as patriotic in a rigged election
I don't think the bolded part is quite correct.
I think that Trump wants his sycophants to know perfectly well that it is a lie. There is more power for Trump in having people know the truth and be forced to constantly lie than in having people who actually believe what they are saying.
"In aReuters/Ipsos polllast week, the president's approval rating fell to 43%, down 4 points from a similar survey back when he took office in January. The poll this month was conducted over three days, concluding on the day of Trump's tariffs announcement, or what he hasreferred to as "Liberation Day."
Voters surveyed docked Trump for his handling of the economy and efforts to address the high cost of living. Just over half of those polled said increasing tariffs would do more harm than good."
You are the one claiming I don't understand the study and that the P value is "bad". The burden is on you to back up your claims. What "correlation" are you even talking about?
Your initial claim was that a healthy 25 year old did not need to get vaccinated for COVID. Here's two studies showing that hundreds of people in their 20s and 30s with no pre-existing conditions died after getting COVID.
Don't get me wrong, there are like 20 different shortcomings of the manuscripts that I wouldn't have let past if I were peer-reviewing them. But, you haven't identified any of them. Instead you tried to argue that all of the people had pre-existing conditions and didn't know about them. Now you're trying to argue about a P value that you don't understand.
I'm asking you to be specific in your criticisms. People could maybe take you seriously then. When all you do is cast about generalities and insults nobody takes you seriously.
If you had any idea what a P value was you wouldn't be preening about trying to defend a .55.
There were 239,952 COVID cases in the age group.
1488 deaths.
72,768 comorbidities are counted.
How many of those 1488 deaths had zero comorbidities in the study?
You still haven't shown what the P value in the context of Table 2 in the first study means. But, to answer your question: 680. They literally put the number in the table.
Also, not sure where you got "72,768 comorbidities are counted" from. There were 60,904 people aged 20-39 with comorbidities.
"In alast week, the president's approval rating fell to 43%, down 4 points from a similar survey back when he took office in January. The poll this month was conducted over three days, concluding on the day of Trump's tariffs announcement, or what he has
Voters surveyed docked Trump for his handling of the economy and efforts to address the high cost of living. Just over half of those polled said increasing tariffs would do more harm than good."
Trump: "Adam Schifty Schiff. Can you believe this guy? He's got the smallest neck I've ever seen. And the biggest head. We call him watermelon head. How can that big fat face stand on a neck that looked like this finger? ... how we can allow people like that to run in office is a shame."
Not doing much to lower my grocery bill, but there is probably a serious discussion to be had here.
Would you prefer to have Schiff’s skinny neck or Trump’s floppy, flabby rolls below his chin?
All we do know for certain is that Trump is not only an economist but he’s the best of the best. Wharton. Top of the heap.
Love the parody accounts. Keep up the good work. This is hysterical!
HA! No economist is worth a grain of salt, including Trump but, if you had to pick one, take Wharton.
Trump keeps it real. 40 years beating the same drum. Time to have his back because the World is dang sure not going to be run by the Chinese, or Muslim religion. The Second Amendment prevents any risk of this happening, Enough of the nonsense, let Trump rollllll!!
What a tragedy, truly terrible. I am not surprised the MSM hasn’t mentioned this tragedy. I am sure Trump—the guy you shill for on this website and clearly favored in the 2024 election—has expressed outrage about this incident, right?
It should be a bigger story, but it is being reported. Unfortunately, it has become commonplace and things like intentionally tanking the world economy are bigger news. Closer to home, things like arresting people for using freedom of speech without stating crimes is sounding alarms. Real media is reporting all of it, so they are not the problem here. Trump provided the bombs and gave NetanYahoo his blessing to indiscriminately kill in Gaza. Focus blame where it belongs.
You helped elect Trump who promised tariffs, you even dug into your own pocket to help swing the election. THIS is what you get.
I don't think that is entirely fair.
One can vote for, and contribute to the campaign of, a candidate whose policies align with your own preferences on 4 out of 5 issues but still strongly disagree on that 5th issue.
Of course you can but it’s pretty fcking dumb when you’re a business owner that heavily relies on foreign imports.
One can vote for, and contribute to the campaign of, a candidate whose policies align with your own preferences on 4 out of 5 issues but still strongly disagree on that 5th issue.
Of course you can but it’s pretty fcking dumb when you’re a business owner that heavily relies on foreign imports.
Aah, the good old days when imports were a novelty. Welcome back.
It should be a bigger story, but it is being reported. Unfortunately, it has become commonplace and things like intentionally tanking the world economy are bigger news. Closer to home, things like arresting people for using freedom of speech without stating crimes is sounding alarms. Real media is reporting all of it, so they are not the problem here. Trump provided the bombs and gave NetanYahoo his blessing to indiscriminately kill in Gaza. Focus blame where it belongs.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.