Fox News learning new things about leopard eating habits every day.
”Fox News tells a story a small business owner who used to pay $26,000 in tariffs on goods imported from China, but now faces a $346,000 tariff due to Trump’s new 104% tariff on Chinese imports. "We think that China is gonna have to pay for it. A special needs toy importer-- when the tariff went into effect, his tariff bill went from $26,000 at midnight to $346,000. And that's money that's got to have to come out of his pocket... They think foreign countries have to pay the tariff, that's not true. Tariffs are being paid by Americans."
Since you passed your IQ test so easily you shouldn't have a problem.
You’re the one claiming it’s bad. Tell us why. Feel free to be as technical as you want. In fact the more technical the better. Then I’ll tell you why you’re wrong.
You clearly have no idea what a P value is.
Stop preening and explain why you think a .55 P value means there's any correlation at all proven in that study.
Then explain why you think the 2nd study which doesn't even attempt to prove correlation supports your claim in any way.
Hey Newname! It might be time for a new computer. Just some friendly advice to help you see where this puck is headed to skate there.
“U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services says it has started screening social media platforms for what it calls "antisemitic activity" as grounds to deny immigration benefits”.
Hey Newname! It might be time for a new computer. Just some friendly advice to help you see where this puck is headed to skate there.
“U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services says it has started screening social media platforms for what it calls "antisemitic activity" as grounds to deny immigration benefits”.
Again, who cares about deporting pro-Hamas grad students?
Who cares? He’s entitled to fire people he doesn’t view as sufficiently loyal.
There is a reason govt officials pledge an oath of loyalty to the constitution and not a person. It is a wonderful field of study for you when you have time.
But in the case of McFarland it takes this even further. To work in the federal government Trump wants you to believe and regurgitate the big lie for him. He wants all to rewrite history and whitewash Trump's traitorous actions as patriotic in a rigged election
If you want to live in that make believe world, have at it.
I don't think the bolded part is quite correct.
I think that Trump wants his sycophants to know perfectly well that it is a lie. There is more power for Trump in having people know the truth and be forced to constantly lie than in having people who actually believe what they are saying.
The idiots who actually believe are just pathetic.
The sycophants who are forced to live the lie are pathetic to the nth degree.
Hey Newname! It might be time for a new computer. Just some friendly advice to help you see where this puck is headed to skate there.
“U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services says it has started screening social media platforms for what it calls "antisemitic activity" as grounds to deny immigration benefits”.
Again, who cares about deporting pro-Hamas grad students?
Skate to where the puck is heading not to where it is. (The great one)
There is a reason govt officials pledge an oath of loyalty to the constitution and not a person. It is a wonderful field of study for you when you have time.
But in the case of McFarland it takes this even further. To work in the federal government Trump wants you to believe and regurgitate the big lie for him. He wants all to rewrite history and whitewash Trump's traitorous actions as patriotic in a rigged election
If you want to live in that make believe world, have at it.
I don't think the bolded part is quite correct.
I think that Trump wants his sycophants to know perfectly well that it is a lie. There is more power for Trump in having people know the truth and be forced to constantly lie than in having people who actually believe what they are saying.
The idiots who actually believe are just pathetic.
The sycophants who are forced to live the lie are pathetic to the nth degree.
Good point. Yes.
Pooty also doesn’t give a rats azz if underlings actually believe the state’s narrative. There is a sadistic joy he gets from watching people debase themselves to make his lies their own.
And the joy is greater when the lies are more insane.
remember when Republicans used to laugh off criticisms of trump, saying the whole problem was just mean tweets and he'd be fine policy wise?
And here we are, stocks crashing down 20%, US treasuries losing safe haven status and the world teaming up against us. 100% percent because of those policies. Not mean tweets.
You helped elect Trump who promised tariffs, you even dug into your own pocket to help swing the election. THIS is what you get.
I don't think that is entirely fair.
One can vote for, and contribute to the campaign of, a candidate whose policies align with your own preferences on 4 out of 5 issues but still strongly disagree on that 5th issue.
remember when Republicans used to laugh off criticisms of trump, saying the whole problem was just mean tweets and he'd be fine policy wise?
And here we are, stocks crashing down 20%, US treasuries losing safe haven status and the world teaming up against us. 100% percent because of those policies. Not mean tweets.
What stock crash? Nasdaq up 1.50% today, S&P up 0.70%, Dow +0.47%?
You helped elect Trump who promised tariffs, you even dug into your own pocket to help swing the election. THIS is what you get.
I don't think that is entirely fair.
One can vote for, and contribute to the campaign of, a candidate whose policies align with your own preferences on 4 out of 5 issues but still strongly disagree on that 5th issue.
yeah Elon had two issues:
slay 'wokeism'
and shrink the federal government.
Elon was right to back spanky on those two things.
remember when Republicans used to laugh off criticisms of trump, saying the whole problem was just mean tweets and he'd be fine policy wise?
And here we are, stocks crashing down 20%, US treasuries losing safe haven status and the world teaming up against us. 100% percent because of those policies. Not mean tweets.
What stock crash? Nasdaq up 1.50% today, S&P up 0.70%, Dow +0.47%?
What are they since Inauguration Day? Did you expect them to go down every day for eternity?
Always searching for silver linings, one at least has:
1) Tens of millions of people will get EXACTLY what they deserve from their vote last Nov.
2) THEORETICALLY lower chance of Rs winning in 2026.
3) THEORETICALLY lower chance of a Trump clone (or R of any kind) winning in 2028.
You might assume that but for MAGA supporters, what they genuinely seem to relish is the suffering of those they don't like.
They will eat dog food each day if it means their perceived "enemies"—like immigrants, single mothers, people of color, college students, and transgender individuals—are forced to eat kibble.
The only time MAGA followers might reconsider their loyalty to Trump is if they feel that the groups they resent are experiencing hardships at a slower pace than their own.
This is why the incessant posting about various culture war issues is so prevalent in their circles. It's a move to constantly reinforce the idea that there are those out that are being made to suffer socially more acutely than they are economically . And they love that!
Off the top of my head, I think of 3 different Trump voting groups with respect to this:
1) Non-M*G*s who nonetheless voted for him: Openly pissed off, one could imagine.
2) Less hardcore M*G*s: Eventually, possibly, openly pissed off.
3) Hardest hardcore M*G*s: Never openly pissed off, but......yeah, some STILL pretty damn pissed off, if it gets bad enough for them. They might be hardcore M*G*s, but they're STILL whiny Americans.....in the Dollar Store parking lot.
You’re the one claiming it’s bad. Tell us why. Feel free to be as technical as you want. In fact the more technical the better. Then I’ll tell you why you’re wrong.
You clearly have no idea what a P value is.
Stop preening and explain why you think a .55 P value means there's any correlation at all proven in that study.
Then explain why you think the 2nd study which doesn't even attempt to prove correlation supports your claim in any way.
You are the one claiming I don't understand the study and that the P value is "bad". The burden is on you to back up your claims. What "correlation" are you even talking about?
Your initial claim was that a healthy 25 year old did not need to get vaccinated for COVID. Here's two studies showing that hundreds of people in their 20s and 30s with no pre-existing conditions died after getting COVID.
Don't get me wrong, there are like 20 different shortcomings of the manuscripts that I wouldn't have let past if I were peer-reviewing them. But, you haven't identified any of them. Instead you tried to argue that all of the people had pre-existing conditions and didn't know about them. Now you're trying to argue about a P value that you don't understand.
I'm asking you to be specific in your criticisms. People could maybe take you seriously then. When all you do is cast about generalities and insults nobody takes you seriously.
You helped elect Trump who promised tariffs, you even dug into your own pocket to help swing the election. THIS is what you get.
I don't think that is entirely fair.
One can vote for, and contribute to the campaign of, a candidate whose policies align with your own preferences on 4 out of 5 issues but still strongly disagree on that 5th issue.
With "any given issue" I'd probably agree. But when the 5th issue is, "Destroying the American and world economies".......nope. Oh, and you are a "genius" businessman, no less, who obviously should know better. Maybe find another candidate to vomit cash at.
Fox News learning new things about leopard eating habits every day.
”Fox News tells a story a small business owner who used to pay $26,000 in tariffs on goods imported from China, but now faces a $346,000 tariff due to Trump’s new 104% tariff on Chinese imports. "We think that China is gonna have to pay for it. A special needs toy importer-- when the tariff went into effect, his tariff bill went from $26,000 at midnight to $346,000. And that's money that's got to have to come out of his pocket... They think foreign countries have to pay the tariff, that's not true. Tariffs are being paid by Americans."
Economists are nickel-dime theorists, cheap philosophy rooted in the dark halls of Ivy League institutions. it’s pseudo science. Fauci would’ve been a wizard had he taken such a benign route in his pursuit of the sciences.
All we do know for certain is that Trump is not only an economist but he’s the best of the best. Wharton. Top of the heap. He’s been talking about tariffs since the 80’s, thinking outside the box when others were firmly in it. Pelosi had his back though. She stood strong then in the face of China, but now she had grown weak. She represents you folks.
While Trump has stayed strong and now it’s showtime. buckle up and do not ever be afraid of the Chinese. Face them. it’s Communism vs Democracy. Nobody on Earth, least of all Chinese people, want to live under Communism. There is only one possible victor here, and Trump understands this.
Relax, and read the book. The Art of the Deal V2, will be the best seller of all best sellers.