DiscoGary wrote:
Well everyone in the country just had an interaction with the FBI and we all can see that they conspired to get Hillary off the hook after committing and obvious crime.
A "crime" without a meaningful penalty. What's the point of dredging up Clinton?
If I'm using Trump logic, you may as well complain about Lincoln. It's so long ago that it doesn't matter, and that person wasn't that important anyway. Do the Trump thing and pretend it didn't happen.
Timothy Foyle wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Maybe some of our deep state FBI connections can tell us what would happen to them if they put secret documents on their unsecured home computer and exposed it the world's hackers.
I would not make the case that she was negligent, because clearly she INTENDED to hide this server from Congressional oversight. She intended to break the law. If she insists on saying it was accident, then that would trigger the gross negligence clause. There's no way she should have avoided punishment for this.
Exactly! Just 2 words for the lib-taard-ians on this thread. DEEP STATE.
Just remember those two words and it will all suddenly make sense.
DEEP STATE.
.
.
.
Or you can just continue being sheeple.
Wait! I think I got it:
DEEP . . .
DEEP . . .
er..
ah I forgot. What was it again?
baa
L L wrote:
This thread seems to be missing representation of regular Republicans who do not like Trump or at least have a lot of problems with his messaging.
Or does everyone simply follow and support their party?
There are Republicans congressman who speak out against Trump but no Letsrun Republican posters, it seems.
There's an occasional moderate Republican post that basically laments Trump sodomizing the Republic.
#######
Most voters will vote along party lines with even a toxic candidate like a Trump or Moore. It's why elections typically win/lose based on a very narrow percentage of people who either ignore parties and vote whomever they feel best about, or bringing in votes from some group that does not typically vote.
GOP rep defends inviting alt-right activist to the State of the Union
Racists being well represented by the Right. Good job, Conservative Justice Warriors.
BRuce Wrote wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Sorry, that's not even possible as she is not the President. Most Americans couldn't even tell you who she is...sad but true.
So...no, you are wrong about that.
so no, he's right about that.
No, he's wrong. I already said so, and I gave the reason which is irrefutable.
Now, you are wrong too.
theOP wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Yep. Pathetic how low the bar is set for this guy.
Do all POTUS write their own speech? I thought they had speechwriters?
They all have speechwriters, yes. That is the point here...the one time he gives a speech where he doesn't deviate from what he is told to say, Trump supporters claim it was a great one. That's why and how the bar is set so low for him; he is perceived as doing well when he reads another's words like a slow robot. He will go back to his normal unhinged ways very soon.
obvious problem wrote:
Timothy Foyle wrote:
Exactly! Just 2 words for the lib-taard-ians on this thread. DEEP STATE.
Just remember those two words and it will all suddenly make sense.
DEEP STATE.
.
.
.
Or you can just continue being sheeple.
Wait! I think I got it:
DEEP . . .
DEEP . . .
er..
ah I forgot. What was it again?
baa
"STATE"
It's "STATE"
And you have to say it with the right voice to get the full effect. Think Marlon Brando.
DEEP
STATE
Now, you'll understand EVERYTHING.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
DiscoGary wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Gary - do you also have a conspiracy theory to explain the numerous times Hillary was officially investigated by Republicans and cleared? Ok I'll let you start with ex-plaining which laws she broke. Despite the 110% effort Republicans gave to find something on Obama, they came up empty-handed as well. Now I know they promised you over all these years that they would "get them", but you were simply lied to buddy, there was nothing.
Clinton was unarguably hurt by the FBI probe, you are simply crazy if you think it was a good thing. Comey unarguably helped Trump when he called her out on the emails just days before the election. Again, I don't know what logic you apply in your daily life, but these two events only helped Trump. Hillary has no one to blame but herself. She didn't work hard enough to win and operated too deeply in the grey zone (or worse - yet to be proven). However, that you and your buddies keep pointing to her and Obama as somehow being as bad or worse than your dear leader is beyond pathetic. If you're going to go there, at least use prosecutable criteria. You've got nothing on Hillary or Obama. Or, how about trying to argue in support of Trump by looking at his individual words and actions, that would make more sense. Man, if you're so desperate now, you'll be unhinged when the GOP loses a ton of seats in the midterms.
Hillary broke the law with her off site insecure server. She was not prosecuted. Hillary is above the law and it is a very good thing that she did not become president.
Dude, you are going off the deep end. Hillary's transgressions pale in comparison to what Trump has been charged with and suspected of. We're talking ties with the mob from at least three different countries, money laundering, conspiracy against the United States, obstruction of justice, and if he is ever interviewed, Perjury also. He clearly supports Putin and Russia any time he gets. And, people in his administration have been using private e-mail servers including Kushner. Yes Hillary shouldn't have done that, but that HUGE scandal of hers is just a normal week for Trump...and it's going to get worse for Trump too. He's in big big trouble because he has done some bad bad things, and he will have to face the music, and while I don't care if you and other Trump supporters do or not, but you should have to grovel for forgiveness after it is made public how bad Trump has been and is. Sarah Sanders and Kellyanne Conway should never get to have a professional job again being such complicit liars.
It's really really bad dude.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
L L wrote:
...
Disco Gary is a genius ... with very logical, intelligent points.
....
Welcome to the DiscoGary Fan Club! Your autographed T shirt and coffee mug are in the email.
Here is the way it is wrote:
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
I could not have said so better myself.
Flagpole wrote:
...
Hillary's transgressions pale in comparison to what Trump has been charged with and suspected of.
....
No. I think Hillary's sale of 20% of our uranium supply to Russia in return for Clinton Crime Family Foundation donations is competing with Obama's FBI stooges attempting to overthrow an election are the top two scandals in the last few years.
Flagpole wrote:
BRuce Wrote wrote:
so no, he's right about that.
No, he's wrong. I already said so, and I gave the reason which is irrefutable.
Now, you are wrong too.
No. You’ve definitively been proven wrong about that. It’s Pelosi and it’s not even close. Even Dems don’t like her.
Wrong!!! wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
No, he's wrong. I already said so, and I gave the reason which is irrefutable.
Now, you are wrong too.
No. You’ve definitively been proven wrong about that. It’s Pelosi and it’s not even close. Even Dems don’t like her.
lol, moron.
If even dems don't like her, then she's unifying. Much like our president should unite anyone with an inkling of decency against him.
DiscoGary wrote:
Explain why an FBI that was completely in the tank for Clinton would release extremely over-hyped and damaging information about her right before the election. Explain why they didn't do the same to Trump when they very well could have. Explain why Clinton and the FBI would conspire to create a fake salacious dossier and then wait until AFTER the election to use it.
I'm not going to play a distractionary game of amateur lawyer on a tangential topic unless you can offer up some responses here.
Because Hillary committed a crime and Trump didn't.[/quote]
That doesn't make sense.
The new emails the FBI revealed they were looking into did not end up indicating criminal behavior on Clinton's part at all. And, even if they did, why would the FBI notify Congress about this if they were actually in the tank for Hillary? It is against Justice Department protocols to disclose details of investigations close to an election. You could easily make the case that it was completely inappropriate to publicize that information, but the FBI did it anyway. What's more, they didn't do it for Trump, who was also the subject of an investigation.
These are plainly not the actions of a secret intelligence society that is willing to stage a coup to keep Trump out of office. You are in a deep state of denial and delusion.
DiscoGary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
...
Hillary's transgressions pale in comparison to what Trump has been charged with and suspected of.
....
No. I think Hillary's sale of 20% of our uranium supply to Russia in return for Clinton Crime Family Foundation donations is competing with Obama's FBI stooges attempting to overthrow an election are the top two scandals in the last few years.
Uranium!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You really are crazy.
BTW, I seem to recall a week or so ago that I said Gates has flipped. Looks like I was right. Continued panic in the WH. Better release a memo.
But wait, we just learned that Page has been under surveillance since at least 2014. But that damn dossier!!! Deep state!!!
Mueller time is fast approaching!
Country over party.
I love listening to libs whine about elections being rigged and interfered with when they rigged their OWN primaries.
Lol
DiscoGary wrote:
No. I think Hillary's sale of 20% of our uranium supply to Russia in return for Clinton Crime Family Foundation donations is competing with Obama's FBI stooges attempting to overthrow an election are the top two scandals in the last few years.
Sometimes you sound at least semi-intellgent (dishonest and lacking all integrity to be sure, but semi-intelligent). But then you come along with batshit crazy conspiracy stuff like this ^ .
You are an absolute moron. Or, giving you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you think you are being funny?
Whiners wrote:
I love listening to libs whine about elections being rigged and interfered with when they rigged their OWN primaries.
Lol
lols ... you rigged by trump and putin. that guarantee a watering down of the democratic vote. it improved trump's chances at election.
do try to keep up, okay...
Flagpole - "Quality Posters Only". Please abide by the rules of this thread.
Thanks,
mgmt