well, geez wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/viewers-approve-of-trumps-first-state-of-the-union-address-cbs-news-poll/
What did you expect, he recited a speech that was written for a real president. How well do you think he would have done as himself?
foo fighter wrote:Show a little respect for the president.
Completely unaware he's a racist sodomizing the Republic while wasting the taxpayer's time watching Fox and Friends. No thank you.
What's the matter? Did some mean people not show Proper Respect to the Dear Leader and it's hurt your little, fragile, feelings? There, there snowflake. You and the Dear Leader aren't the only two people in the world.. Sometimes, people will disagree with you.
I know it's hard, but be a good liberal and enjoy your freedom believe that God made Trump President before it is printed in every textbook in America.. and get a thicker skin. You'll need it once you leave your parent's basement.
DiscoGary wrote:
Do you remember during the debates when Trump was asked if he would accept the results of the election if he lost, and when he said ~"It depends" liberals went nuts for several weeks claiming that Trump's refusal to accept the results of the election would undermine our democracy and that it would be the end of the world?
I remember that.
Well here we are now where not only have Democrats refused to accept the results of the election, but we are finding out that they were using the surveillance apparatus of the US to monitor his campaign with the explicit goal of getting him impeached. Democrats HAVE undermined our democracy.
Democrats, always guilty of doing what they accuse everyone else of doing.
Do you know what I remember? I remember that less than two weeks before the election, the Director of the FBI sent a letter to Congress saying that they had learned of the existence of additional emails that were pertinent to the Clinton private server investigation. I remember the media running headlines casting this revelation in a dark, mysterious light. I remember Trump winning the election by an extremely small margin because of the effect this had. I remember that the emails referenced by the Comey letter were actually inconsequential and that the FBI also had information regarding a troubling relationship between Trump and Russia that it chose NOT to share before the election. Yet, somehow, you think this sequence of events occurred in the context of a DEEP STATE that was dedicated to electing Clinton and stopping Trump at all costs? That is one worthless shadow government.
Let's compare their first SOTU speeches:
Obama speech approval 47% (01/28/2010)
Trump speech approval 75% (01/30/2018)
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Let's compare their first SOTU speeches:
Obama speech approval 47% (01/28/2010)
Trump speech approval 75% (01/30/2018)
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
You are delusional if you believe the Trump stat.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Man I am loving this "I am Hispanic" angle. You're probably a dweeby gun nut from Las Vegas.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Let's compare their first SOTU speeches:
Obama speech approval 47% (01/28/2010)
Trump speech approval 75% (01/30/2018)
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
Lets look at how bigly Trump is winning. He doesn’t even have a 50% approval rating in places like SC, GA and MS. And less than 40% in TX. No wonder the Democrats are happy about the midterm elections.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/politics/trump-approval-ratings-gallup/index.htmlSo democrats should clap for someone who is a serial philanderer, pathological liar and fundamentally at odds with pretty much everything that is taught in the Bible to demonstrate their love for Jesus?
lol. No wonder Trump Sr is considered the brains of the family. Pretty sure if we needed any more evidence for Trump's low IQ we need not look further than his offspring.
foo wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Let's compare their first SOTU speeches:
Obama speech approval 47% (01/28/2010)
Trump speech approval 75% (01/30/2018)
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
Lets look at how bigly Trump is winning. He doesn’t even have a 50% approval rating in places like SC, GA and MS. And less than 40% in TX. No wonder the Democrats are happy about the midterm elections.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/30/politics/trump-approval-ratings-gallup/index.html
Dems were happy for most of Election Day 2016 too. We all know how that turned out.
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Let's compare their first SOTU speeches:
Obama speech approval 47% (01/28/2010)
Trump speech approval 75% (01/30/2018)
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
You are delusional if you believe the Trump stat.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
INCORRECT!!!
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/polls-trump-approval-state-of-the-union-speech-loved-2018-1mwebster3 wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
un·bri·dled
ˌənˈbrīdld/Submit
adjective
uncontrolled; unconstrained.
Good. Now you should realize that doesn’t apply to American welfare policies, though I acknowledge that is harder than just looking something up and pasting it.
Sorry, it does in fact apply. Its unrestrained, and corrupt. if you can't see that, you're blind.
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
What is it about people that have no rational argument, that race and racism is the only answer they have for everything? Curious indeed.
That is hilarious irony and hypocrisy with a good dose of idiocy thrown in. You guys only complain and whine about people screaming "racism" when it's black people doing the screaming. But what happened the second we had our first HALF-black president?? Sooooo many on the right, wait for it, suddenly started screaming "racist" at him. Yup, tons of examples about him favoring blacks and hating white. So you guys are complete and utter hypocrites on this topic. You only mind the "race-card" when it is play on you.
Furthermore, while of course there are instances where "Racism" is called out where it doesn't exist, and yes that is annoying, there are still TONS of instances of true racism that occur all across the nation, and since Trump has become our leader, this has only seemed to increase.
By making a mockery of the idea of "racism", as if it barely exists anymore, as if it hasn't caused unimaginable damage to black people and communities for centuries in this country, shows what an unsympathetic, ahistorical, and racist-leaning individual that you truly are. Yes, it shows your true identity. It's not a funny little joke, actually, it's something that is a stain on our nation, and still a very big problem (and sure, it works both ways, but blacks have suffered racism at the hands of white 1000000x more than the other way around.)
Grow up, old man.
I'm plenty grown, thank you. No mockery, just interesting how those on the left have to resort to it (like you) when they have weak to no arguments. Its an act of desperation. And I'll double down on the statement that a new, more subtle "racism" is what we see today, democratic policies enabling the welfare state and the disincentive to work, and disincentive to better ones self through education and as a result, ever decreasing opportunity. Has nothing to do with what the AA population went through in the past.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine AM?
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
mwebster3 wrote:
Good. Now you should realize that doesn’t apply to American welfare policies, though I acknowledge that is harder than just looking something up and pasting it.
Sorry, it does in fact apply. Its unrestrained, and corrupt. if you can't see that, you're blind.
There are limitations. Use Google, it can educate you.
Or you could just try to go get welfare yourself. $1m seems like a nice round number to ask for. It is unbridled, after all.
curious cat wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
As long as they continue to work jobs keeping your groceries cheap, your house clean, and construction projects cheap. no one minds except you and your xenophobic friends.
Who did those jobs, say, thirty-forty-fifty-plus years ago?
Times change.
The people that did those jobs in the past never wanted their children to grow up and do them. They wanted better for them. And they have done better.
So that left an unfilled demand for those jobs. Immigrants stepped up to do them.
And I guess many who came in illegally and would accept cash.
And this illegal immigration has been going down for years, by the way.
This country has created a demand for cheap labor and illegal drugs that people coming through the southern border are fulfilling.
It's our own fault.
For you loonies who think people somehow like Teump more than Obama. Millions of people called for Obama to f the constitution and run for a third term.
In contrast millions of people are saying Yrp should resign.
mwebster3 wrote:
Or you could just try to go get welfare yourself. $1m seems like a nice round number to ask for. It is unbridled, after all.
Ok for all the nit pickers on here.............LIMITED restraint on it, unless of course you are gainfully employed and not inclined to try and cheat the system. The fact of the matter is that its easy to get, there are LIMITED restraints, no work requirements (may vary by state), and rampant fraud. MA and RI are classic examples.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
mwebster3 wrote:
Or you could just try to go get welfare yourself. $1m seems like a nice round number to ask for. It is unbridled, after all.
Ok for all the nit pickers on here.............LIMITED restraint on it, unless of course you are gainfully employed and not inclined to try and cheat the system. The fact of the matter is that its easy to get, there are LIMITED restraints, no work requirements (may vary by state), and rampant fraud. MA and RI are classic examples.
You know it’s mostly white people on welfare?