Charlie Kirk killed at campus event in Utah

Lolz

“Dinesh D'Souza @DineshDSouza
X.com
Tyler Robinson is every conservative parent's worst nightmare.
Send your kid to college where he is radicalized into a violent "antifascist” by the sly, scheming leftist professors.
We need to put radical academia on trial along with its cherished product, Tyler Robinson.”

He was in an electrical apprentice program at a tiny college in Logan Utah.

Lmao I say this and then today Trump says that it’s only the left that’s the problem, and the right is only radical to stop crime.

I’m done disavowing any violence from the left until the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES can disavow all violence from the right.

I got banned for one hour for having the audacity to directly quote Nancy Mace, Congresswoman!

lol

https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1966575444435890341#m

Yep. Me too

you can’t type that T word

So the caught a white guy associated possible with Nick Fuentes...............wow this must of thrown the right wing including Rojo for a loop. They seemed to already have a narrative going , LMAO

According to AI:
"Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist, is a known critic of Charlie Kirk and mainstream conservatism, often through his online shows. Some of Fuentes' followers have been hostile towards Kirk and his supporters in the past.

Recent speculation has linked Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, with white nationalist Nick Fuentes and his followers known as "Groypers".

This connection emerged following the discovery of anti-fascist phrases allegedly engraved on bullet casings used in the shooting.

Here's a breakdown of what is known based on current reports:
Speculative connection:

The link between Robinson and Fuentes' "Groypers" has been made by social media users who noted the anti-fascist messaging found at the scene, contrasting with the ideology of Fuentes and his movement.

The Groypers are a white nationalist group and are openly hostile toward mainstream conservatives like Charlie Kirk."

"

It’s a serious offense to actually notice and remember things that Republicans say and do.

Dinesh “former Christian college president fired for adultery” D’Souza makes this claim because the alleged assailant went to college for one semester before dropping out.

all the RWNJ pundits have stroked out! hannity choked on his own c* m!

Yes, the woke automod banned me for typing tr@nny about a week ago - for 1 hour

Test. Test. Test.

Tell me I'm not an enemy of the state as well, please.

Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
An account with 5 million followers on X posts a fake photo of suspect Tyler Robinson wearing a Trump shirt and quietly follows up in a thread with the real photo.
The fake photo (which hasn't been deleted) gets 400k impressions in an hour, and the real one gets 50k.
There appears to be a coordinated effort right now to spread as much fake information as possible to label the alleged Kirk assassin as a far-right Trump supporter.

There is no such thing as liberalism — or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually
exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has
driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet
exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is
necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately,
this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of
polity had ever been proposed. “The king can do no wrong.” In
practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends,
however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the
king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another
way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an
individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated
baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of
pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such
is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today,
the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the
market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These
Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself — backed
up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that
the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind
anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map “liberalism”, or
“progressivism”, or “socialism”, or
whateverthefukkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of
anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact
same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for
conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of
anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as
sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:
The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

One semester he lasted. Then submerged underground into the bad places on the web.

Who is Nick Fuentes after all? Another general?

You guys spent 24 hours insisting the shooter was trans and circulating fraudulent claims that the bullet casings had "trans ideology" on them. And you're worried about other people spreading fake information?

Dude, their entire platform is built on propaganda and misinformation. Outrage is the only thing that sustains those mindless people.

Is he more influential than Mark Robinson?