Solution Seeker wrote:
rekrunner wrote:If the documented Spanish and Portuguese cases are not the ones who set the European records, you can not argue that EPO helps set European records.
????
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2003-05-22/mourhit-suspended-until-may-2004-report/1858206"The European record holder over 3,000 metres, 5,000m and 10,000m tested positive for the endurance-boosting substance EPO and a masking product on May last year ahead of the World Half Marathon championships in Brussels."
More from Wiki on Mourhit:
Mohammed Mourhit (Arabic: Ù…ØÙ…د Ù…ÙØ±ØÙŠØªâ€Žâ€Ž) (born 10 October 1970 in Khouribga, Morocco) is a Belgian top cross country, middle and long distance runner who holds two European records, in the 3000 m and 5000 m. He is also a former European 10000 m record holder. He won a bronze medal at the 1999 World Championships in the 5000 metres and a silver medal at the 2001 IAAF World Indoor Championships in the 3000 metres behind Hicham El Guerrouj. Mourhit was also a two-time winner of the IAAF World Cross Country Championships in the long course in 2000 and 2001. He also won the Lisbon Half Marathon 1997.[1]
He earned the Belgian citizenship in 1997 by marriage. He competed in Lotto Cross Cup cross country meetings and won the domestic series in 1996–97 and 1997–98.[2]
He was suspended for the use of EPO in 2002. He returned to competition in 2004, after seeing his ban reduced,[3] and qualified for the World Championships in Helsinki 2005.[4]
He holds the fastest non-winning time for the 3000 metres. In Monaco on 18 August 2000, he ran 7:26.62, coming second to Ali Saïdi-Sief. No other man has broken 7:27 and come second.
Personal bests[edit]
3000 m – 7:26.62 (7th all-time)
5000 m – 12:49.71 (15th all-time)
10000 m – 26:52.30 (32nd all-time)
He held 3 European records…but was still beaten by the Algerian doper Ali Saidi-Sief. That was unfortunate.
Of course, Renato and rekrunner will say that he does not count since he was born in Morocco and trained at low altitude in Belgium.
Darn.
Here is some more from Renato Canova on Rita Jeptoo from earlier this year:
..."Rita started her activity with me in Italy in 1999, when was 18 only. She didn't seem talented for long distances…
..."She started again in 2011, running 2:28:09 in Rotterdam, then, at the end of the year, ran Frankfurt in 2:25:44 for the 5th position.
In 2012, she ran Boston in 2:35:53, and finally understood that, with the husband as coach, her career was over. She joined the Group of Claudio Berardelli, and started to train with Prisca Jeptoo and some pacer.
Claudio himself told me was surprised by the motivation, and the ability to work very hard, she showed with him. And she had the big skip of quality, arriving 2nd in Chicago with 2:22:04 (intrinsically worse than the 2:23:38 of Boston 6 years before...).
She became more professional, having big motivation and good technical support, and in 2013, after winning Boston in 2:26, won Chicago running 2:19:57. Nobody could be surprised of this result, looking at her training approach.
In 2014, the big victory in Boston (2:18:57), in a race where ALL THE BEST RUNNERS were very fast, because of the pace of Shalan Flanagan (same situation of Boston 2011 for men : not because the wind, but because the pace of Ryan Hall). So, no surprise at all.
She was caught in a OOC test in Kenya at half of September. If doping is so effective, why she ran only 2:24:35 in Chicago, when already doped ?
So, what did happen in the mind of Rita before Chicago ?
She was in competition for the jackpot of 500,000 USD, and somebody purposed her some illegal support, explaining she needed to be sure to win Chicago in order to have the money. Rita had skiatic problems from the end of July, and her training was not very good, so supposed that, trying to take EPO, could replace the training she didn't do.
The dream of so much money changed her mind, that became weak for that reason.
And she won a "poor" edition of Chicago, in perfect weather conditions (the first 3 men under 2:05 : Kipchoge 2:04:11, Kitwara 2:04:28 and Chumba 2:04:32, while Rita ran 2:24:35 against Mare Dibaba (2:25:37) and a Florence Kiplagat in bad condition (2:25:57) for a problem in her back during the last 3 weeks of training).
So, which advantage EPO gave her, if she ran a race almost 5 minutes slower than her PB ? Of course, you can argue she was already doped when she ran in Boston at the beginning of the season, but the fact is we have ONE PROOF of doping after July, NO PROOVES of doping before that date, and for me (who knows Rita very well) there is not surprise at all looking at her performances BEFORE being caught for EPO.
You can remain of your idea, and I remain of my idea. However, I explained what I think and what I know, using the logic and not stereotypes already present in your mind."
Read more:
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=7142840&page=3#ixzz4U5GGrA68