True SJW wrote:
Publius. wrote:Also right now I am dressed up as one of the village people now
6 men appropriating other people's cultures. That's sexist and racist.
HOMOPHOBE
True SJW wrote:
Publius. wrote:Also right now I am dressed up as one of the village people now
6 men appropriating other people's cultures. That's sexist and racist.
HOMOPHOBE
Note that those times, according to the story, were achieved WHILE taking female hormones and testosterone-suppressing hormones. But the Court for Arbitration for Sport has denied that those are necessary and also denied any gender/sex testing. And the Obama administration guidelines for schools deny the steps that Alaska has taken concerning dress, etc. are necessary. Hence, it would be legal for this athlete to stop the hormone therapy (and to dress like a boy) and with the therapy stopped, presumably run much faster. So, let's fast forward several years. Wangyot has a college scholarship, the coach has indicated that rules do not require hormone suppressant/estrogen therapy, and with coaching and years of training and physical maturity now you have a man declared as a woman running 21, say, or more likely 3:50s.
jjjjjjj wrote:
Note that those times, according to the story, were achieved WHILE taking female hormones and testosterone-suppressing hormones. But the Court for Arbitration for Sport has denied that those are necessary and also denied any gender/sex testing. And the Obama administration guidelines for schools deny the steps that Alaska has taken concerning dress, etc. are necessary. Hence, it would be legal for this athlete to stop the hormone therapy (and to dress like a boy) and with the therapy stopped, presumably run much faster. So, let's fast forward several years. Wangyot has a college scholarship, the coach has indicated that rules do not require hormone suppressant/estrogen therapy, and with coaching and years of training and physical maturity now you have a man declared as a woman running 21, say, or more likely 3:50s.
Great. We can really stick it to women how much better we are than them. This is the greatest sexist plan ever. EVER. Men get to completely take all the motivation out of women to compete in sports.
Gchcghfgghv wrote:
Anyway, this is past tense. It is now allowed. She did win the bronze at the State Championship. You can't go back in time.
You can't go back and remove the rights of women to vote
You can't go back and remove the rights for blacks to go to University
You can't go back and remove the rights for blacks to play professional sports...
You need to look forward.
I can. I will.
Gchcghfgghv wrote:
Anyway, this is past tense. It is now allowed. She did win the bronze at the State Championship. You can't go back in time.
You can't go back and remove the rights of women to vote
You can't go back and remove the rights for blacks to go to University
You can't go back and remove the rights for blacks to play professional sports...
You need to look forward.
You can't go back to treating whites and asians fairly during college admissions.
Why would someone post a picture of Coach D on here that is just mean to him or her.
DiscoGary wrote:
OK. Let's say I agree to go along with the idea that a boy can identify as a girl and that society MUST treat her as a girl.
Does this "identify" business have any limits?
1. Can a white kid identify as a black kid and be legally treated as such by University admission boards and reap all the benefits set aside for blacks?
2. Can a 30 year old identify as a 17 year old and legally enroll in high school and compete in athletics?
3. Can anyone identify as an American citizen and demand to be let into the US?
4. Can anyone identify as a doctor and legally set up a medical practice?
5. Can anyone identify as the President and force the country to treat them as such?
6. Can anyone identify as Benevolent World Ruler and force everyone to bend to their will?
You see where I'm going with this. In fact let's go there. I identify as Benevolent World Ruler, so according to the new rules ignoring truth and reality, everyone MUST bend to my will or be accused of bigotry and have all their school funding revoked. If not, then please tell me why any of us should be forced to treat a boy as a girl. Any logic you use to justify that will also justify my claim to world domination.
Go.
There is actually a book, called the DSM V, that specifically states what and what does not constitute symptoms of mental disorders, such as being transgender. So the extent of identifying goes exactly as far as what it says in the DSM V, no more no less. People can say they identify as whatever gender they want, but if they don't show symptoms of being transgender, then they are not transgender. It really isn't that complicated. You can identify as the supreme world leader, but until you win some sort of election or earn your way to power, the DSM V of leaders would say that you are not the supreme world leader.
TJR25 wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:OK. Let's say I agree to go along with the idea that a boy can identify as a girl and that society MUST treat her as a girl.
Does this "identify" business have any limits?
1. Can a white kid identify as a black kid and be legally treated as such by University admission boards and reap all the benefits set aside for blacks?
2. Can a 30 year old identify as a 17 year old and legally enroll in high school and compete in athletics?
3. Can anyone identify as an American citizen and demand to be let into the US?
4. Can anyone identify as a doctor and legally set up a medical practice?
5. Can anyone identify as the President and force the country to treat them as such?
6. Can anyone identify as Benevolent World Ruler and force everyone to bend to their will?
You see where I'm going with this. In fact let's go there. I identify as Benevolent World Ruler, so according to the new rules ignoring truth and reality, everyone MUST bend to my will or be accused of bigotry and have all their school funding revoked. If not, then please tell me why any of us should be forced to treat a boy as a girl. Any logic you use to justify that will also justify my claim to world domination.
Go.
There is actually a book, called the DSM V, that specifically states what and what does not constitute symptoms of mental disorders, such as being transgender. So the extent of identifying goes exactly as far as what it says in the DSM V, no more no less. People can say they identify as whatever gender they want, but if they don't show symptoms of being transgender, then they are not transgender. It really isn't that complicated. You can identify as the supreme world leader, but until you win some sort of election or earn your way to power, the DSM V of leaders would say that you are not the supreme world leader.
Nope. The DSM has been overridden by Obama's Decree which states clearly that a school may NOT ask for any evidence at all, so changing gender is as simple as saying you identify as something else that morning.
Apparently it's much more complicated than you think it is. I don't need any evidence to identify as Benevolent World Ruler. Please tell me why I am not.
Please stop posting these stupid links.
If you got something to say, say it. If not, go away.
No. the links are related to the story.
Go poop in the ladies room
Those last 4 were not me