Nah. The true evil are the red diaper baby, nation wrecking bolsheviks like Rob Reiner. That’s why they end up having spoiled, crappy kids who do things like butcher their parents.
Meathead has gotten all the attention, but what has gotten lost here is that his son also killed his mother. What kind of a sick human being does something like this?
A product of Hollywood, that’s who.
And the mental illness excuses don’t cut it. Apparently, Reiner and his kid got into an argument at Conan O’Brien‘s Christmas party. Why would Reiner bring a violent mentally ill person to a Christmas party?
The only excuse you could make for something like this is that the child was mentally and physically abused to the point where he just snapped. Either way, not a good look for meathead.
Badcompany wrote: And the mental illness excuses don’t cut it. Apparently, Reiner and his kid got into an argument at Conan O’Brien‘s Christmas party. Why would Reiner bring a violent mentally ill person to a Christmas party?
I know, right? Imagine treating an ill person with love, empathy or respect. I guess the insane asylum must have been full that day.
Are there any subjects you feel you're not qualified to confidently express opinions about?
Badcompany wrote: And the mental illness excuses don’t cut it. Apparently, Reiner and his kid got into an argument at Conan O’Brien‘s Christmas party. Why would Reiner bring a violent mentally ill person to a Christmas party?
I know, right? Imagine treating an ill person with love, empathy or respect. I guess the insane asylum must have been full that day.
Are there any subjects you feel you're not qualified to confidently express opinions about?
Your response is consistent with the mainstream media reaction.
Their attitude has been a combination of “Doesn’t everybody kill their parents?”, and “Orange Man Bad.”
I know, right? Imagine treating an ill person with love, empathy or respect. I guess the insane asylum must have been full that day.
Are there any subjects you feel you're not qualified to confidently express opinions about?
Your response is consistent with the mainstream media reaction.
Their attitude has been a combination of “Doesn’t everybody kill their parents?”, and “Orange Man Bad.”
I think there are a lot of religious Trump supporters who did not like his response to this. The teachings of Jesus say that you must forgive others who sin against you, that you must turn the other cheek and love those who’ve wronged you.
Was Trump’s response indicative of a Christian who has forgiven and is thinking of a tragic event with sadness for a lost life and a broken family, or of a petty narcissist who says “the reason why he was killed is because he didn’t like me”?
I know, right? Imagine treating an ill person with love, empathy or respect. I guess the insane asylum must have been full that day.
Are there any subjects you feel you're not qualified to confidently express opinions about?
Your response is consistent with the mainstream media reaction.
Their attitude has been a combination of “Doesn’t everybody kill their parents?”, and “Orange Man Bad.”
Arguing that a response is wrong because it aligns with the consensus is not the killer argument you seem to think it is. It also misrepresents the consensus. Provide one mainstream media piece where it's claimed that everybody kills their parents.
Almost nobody kills their parents, regardless of whether they have a mental illness or not. The risk to others of taking someone with a mental illness to a party is, on average, negligible. Certainly much less than serving alcohol at the party. Or driving there. You are suggesting that it was unreasonable for a father to take their mentally ill son to a party, with the implication that the tragic outcome was somehow predictable or inevitable. That's a strong claim to make, and you haven't provided any evidence for it.
Your response is consistent with the mainstream media reaction.
Their attitude has been a combination of “Doesn’t everybody kill their parents?”, and “Orange Man Bad.”
Arguing that a response is wrong because it aligns with the consensus is not the killer argument you seem to think it is. It also misrepresents the consensus. Provide one mainstream media piece where it's claimed that everybody kills their parents.
Almost nobody kills their parents, regardless of whether they have a mental illness or not. The risk to others of taking someone with a mental illness to a party is, on average, negligible. Certainly much less than serving alcohol at the party. Or driving there. You are suggesting that it was unreasonable for a father to take their mentally ill son to a party, with the implication that the tragic outcome was somehow predictable or inevitable. That's a strong claim to make, and you haven't provided any evidence for it.
There's a good chance that you will one day, if you haven't already. If so, hopefully people will treat you more thoughtfully than some on here.
We don't need to over think it. A couple of deranged leftist freaks raised another deranged monster through poor parenting. Fortunately, the parents were the only ones to feel the consequences of their horrible parenting before the son could harm others.
Arguing that a response is wrong because it aligns with the consensus is not the killer argument you seem to think it is. It also misrepresents the consensus. Provide one mainstream media piece where it's claimed that everybody kills their parents.
Almost nobody kills their parents, regardless of whether they have a mental illness or not. The risk to others of taking someone with a mental illness to a party is, on average, negligible. Certainly much less than serving alcohol at the party. Or driving there. You are suggesting that it was unreasonable for a father to take their mentally ill son to a party, with the implication that the tragic outcome was somehow predictable or inevitable. That's a strong claim to make, and you haven't provided any evidence for it.
There's a good chance that you will one day, if you haven't already. If so, hopefully people will treat you more thoughtfully than some on here.
We don't need to over think it. A couple of deranged leftist freaks raised another deranged monster through poor parenting. Fortunately, the parents were the only ones to feel the consequences of their horrible parenting before the son could harm others.
Liberals do have to overthink it. They’re always failing and need an endless supply excuses for failure.
Arguing that a response is wrong because it aligns with the consensus is not the killer argument you seem to think it is. It also misrepresents the consensus. Provide one mainstream media piece where it's claimed that everybody kills their parents.
Almost nobody kills their parents, regardless of whether they have a mental illness or not. The risk to others of taking someone with a mental illness to a party is, on average, negligible. Certainly much less than serving alcohol at the party. Or driving there. You are suggesting that it was unreasonable for a father to take their mentally ill son to a party, with the implication that the tragic outcome was somehow predictable or inevitable. That's a strong claim to make, and you haven't provided any evidence for it.
There's a good chance that you will one day, if you haven't already. If so, hopefully people will treat you more thoughtfully than some on here.
We don't need to over think it. A couple of deranged leftist freaks raised another deranged monster through poor parenting. Fortunately, the parents were the only ones to feel the consequences of their horrible parenting before the son could harm others.
In the name of love the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, you are forgiven for your wicked words towards your fellow man
We don't need to over think it. A couple of deranged leftist freaks raised another deranged monster through poor parenting. Fortunately, the parents were the only ones to feel the consequences of their horrible parenting before the son could harm others.
In the name of love the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, you are forgiven for your wicked words towards your fellow man
From what I’ve read so far about Nick, the post is spot on. He was a piece of sh!t from the word go.
I followed Reiner for a long time during Trump’s first presidency. Every other post was TDS. Ironically, he never mentioned his son. Before this incident, I didn’t even know Reiner had a son.
Doesn’t matter. The reality is that the most prominent left-wing activist in Hollywood raised a son who murdered his parents.
In the name of love the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, you are forgiven for your wicked words towards your fellow man
From what I’ve read so far about Nick, the post is spot on. He was a piece of sh!t from the word go.
I followed Reiner for a long time during Trump’s first presidency. Every other post was TDS. Ironically, he never mentioned his son. Before this incident, I didn’t even know Reiner had a son.
Doesn’t matter. The reality is that the most prominent left-wing activist in Hollywood raised a son who murdered his parents.
In the name of love the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, you are forgiven for your wicked words towards your fellow man
From what I’ve read so far about Nick, the post is spot on. He was a piece of sh!t from the word go.
I followed Reiner for a long time during Trump’s first presidency. Every other post was TDS. Ironically, he never mentioned his son. Before this incident, I didn’t even know Reiner had a son.
Doesn’t matter. The reality is that the most prominent left-wing activist in Hollywood raised a son who murdered his parents.
Even if they had wanted to, it would be impossible to raise a child in a way that would result in him becoming a drug addict that would murder his parents. Reiner raised three other kids that didn’t become drug addicts or shoot anyone.
Since you seem to be an expert on the subject, what do you think the Reiners should have done to prevent their son from murdering them?
Meathead has gotten all the attention, but what has gotten lost here is that his son also killed his mother. What kind of a sick human being does something like this?
A product of Hollywood, that’s who.
And the mental illness excuses don’t cut it. Apparently, Reiner and his kid got into an argument at Conan O’Brien‘s Christmas party. Why would Reiner bring a violent mentally ill person to a Christmas party?
The only excuse you could make for something like this is that the child was mentally and physically abused to the point where he just snapped. Either way, not a good look for meathead.
The other 2 children seemed to have turned out really great. It was this child who got into drugs and turned out really well. They put Nick into rehab like 17 times. They did everything they could for him. He was just a rotten apple. When I look at all the pics of Rob and his family HE is the one with the biggest smile. He always seems to be so happy.
From what I’ve read so far about Nick, the post is spot on. He was a piece of sh!t from the word go.
I followed Reiner for a long time during Trump’s first presidency. Every other post was TDS. Ironically, he never mentioned his son. Before this incident, I didn’t even know Reiner had a son.
Doesn’t matter. The reality is that the most prominent left-wing activist in Hollywood raised a son who murdered his parents.