Mo Katir admits whereabouts failures -- banned 2 years and will miss '24 Olympics

Khamis wrote:

"You refer to "God's words" but also referred me to a version of the bible where God's words were translated and edited by King James in the 1600s. King James was a man who was not satisfied with earlier English Geneva and Bishops bibles, which were created and published in the mid-1500s."

So what's your damn issue here??? I don't want any more emotionally and spiritually uncommitted vapid and empty rationalization of this and that, Salazar, God, NOPer, sport performance, RF/EMFs from you. I want a YES OR NO answer from you and not a clinic of half-baked and seemingly infertile and libido-less justifications and arguments that lacks a clear-cut stance, moral or otherwise, on any and every subject of our discussion from Salazar, God, NOPer, RF/EMF, sport performance etc.

I give you an example of statements I, and everybody else, don't want to hear from you on LRC:

"There is no objective evidence of Salazar being a doper and promoting doping as means to gain unfair advantage for his NOP athletes."

Instead I and everybody else want to hear statements like this:

"There is lots of infinitely more superior subjective+circumstantial evidence of Salazar, including first hand eyewitness accounts, apologetic to doping and its methodology. In particular, the circumstances that surrounded Salazar's investigation and his entire NOP team is so circumstantially+subjectively fraught and/or susceptible that any presumption of objective evidence in support of the null-hypothesis (that Salazar did not dope anybody) is at best tenuous and at worst foolhardy!!!!! Thus, I rekrunner, will take the outright stance, like a real solid masculine, that Salazar is at least probably a doper if not a guaranteed one!!!"

We on LRC want you to commit to a form of persuasion (reasoning) that applies to everything and everybody including God.

Rather than tell me 10 vague counter-arguments why God as an idea, person, Scripture or otherwise mightn't be reliable or otherwise, we want you to save all these BS and just go straight to the point----Do you believe in Jesus Christ the Savior God?? Are you a Christian, much less a True God-fearing Christian???

Don't tell me how a simple google search reveals how God or Scripture could be otherwise fallacious or whatever corruptible, tell me about you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I wanna know you deeply, dear rekrunner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Where do you allegiances and beliefs lie. If you think its agnostic then cut straight to the chase for once, do you understand sir????????????????????

Be like me, Khamis, a real tough as nuts RF male masculine!!!!! Be committed to something.....women find such men really attractive as well if you are single and unattached!!

Khamis wrote:

You claim I misunderstand, but you are the king of misunderstanding creation LOL!!!

Since you are so pedantic (semantical and stingy) in your arguments as to so severely control, limit and narrow the interpretation of facts, why aren't you displaying the same level of commitment in your replies to me in making me understand off the bat with no misunderstanding that you did not come questioning my subjectivity but only to ask for my objectivity???

How did you uncharacteristically err for that one moment in space-time to not clarify your responses with such narrow and limited parameters unless it was designed by you hence fully intended as to be intentional!!!! The question then begs why did you reserve such intention only for me unless you have ulterior malevolent agenda against me inasmuch as to deceive me!!!!

I'm even more pedantic (semantical and stingy) than you, dear rekrunner, if I desired to be so. My lens/filters to reality are even more nanoscopic than yours, relatively speaking, and if I wanted to apply myself this way due to my RF background!

I also don't shy away from emotional reasoning hence try to hide my emotions on LRC precisely because emotion is one of the pillars of reasoning, not just 'objective' reasoning. And I don't hide behind the veneer of civil believability (aka fakery) like you as a means to launch a pro-doping agenda for all intents and purposes!

Khamis wrote:

"You misunderstand"

I didn't misunderstand anything. Instead, you tend to have people misunderstand that you are pro-doping and actually finally believe that you are so despite all your later pleas and cries to the opposite!!!!

"I'm pretty sure I've consistently asked you for objectivity, as well as authoritative sources, from the beginning, and you understood it correctly from the beginning, often quoting it back to me. Your initial response was to say your brand of subjectivity was superior, that objectivity is really an ILLUSION anyway, and that you alone were already a sufficiently qualified authority, and there is no need to look at sport performance."

And I gave you 3rd party extremely experienced (compared to you!) independent expert's opinions, a grand total of 2 and possibly more showing both objective evidences together with their subjective interpretation which is as good as objective in actual actuality that anthropogenic RF and EMFs suppresses human cells/organs in all space-time which makes suppressing sport performance a foregone conclusion since you need to utilize your cells and organs to exercise and do sports!!! So I had you DOUBLE objectivity if you would like to call it!!!! While I admit their expert views are still illusion but I explicitly mentioned to you that those were 'accurate illusions' or illusions of a HIGHER-ORDER existence and consciousness those kinds that definitely trump and beat LOWER-ORDER mere sport physiology findings from non-EMF trained sports scientists. But miraculously as always, you claim all these information can be overlooked despite being a baby in the realm of EMFs!!!! If I can even get Ross Tucker, a well respected sport scientist previously featured on LRC to give favorably expert interpretation in an independent manner with no fear of political/financial repercussions from his government of the susceptibility of EMFs in sport performance, I guess you and your hypocrisy will be put to burial!!!

You also fail to admit that the fact that you seem to have trouble believing anthropogenic RF and EMF harms sport performance might not necessarily be due to a gross lack of scientific research and interest in this area given its 100-year history but rather due to a gross unfair and unjust or malevolent suppression of such research and their findings/information due only to political/financial/economic/social repercussions!!! You yourself admit that all of Google's searches turn up as 'no harmful effect' right?? Why don't you employ a different line of thought and think out of box this way?? Why can't you think your government of whichever country that might be compromising the truth to you rather than that there are no present day objective evidence of harm on sport performance??

"I'm also pretty certain I informed you of my tendency to strip all posts of all their subjectivity, looking only for objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations -- as I already have a sufficient personal supply of my own subjectivity. I generally do this for "experts" too -- if they are unable to support their "expert" opinions with facts, evidence, and observations, I tend to put these opinions off to the side, until they can be corroborated or objectively supported."

LOL, you definitely didn't admit you had subjectivity in you until after I applied pressure on you with my superior reason and persuasion regarding 'interpretation of objective facts' which requires more than just an ordinary dose of subjectivity. I invoke 'your own subjectivity' using my reasoning skills on you to force your hand and your admittance!!! And finally I even silence and confound your reasoning ability when I asked you whether God can be objectively proven and even you knew that you finally lost the argument because everybody in this world save atheists and agnostics have the innate and accurate ability to know God exist subjectively with no objective proof!!! Since God is the highest consciousness and existence and which requires no sequential objective proof being faithfully proven by the hearts and souls of mankind from the outset, that means subjectivity is the King of Proofs, the emotions, the feelings, the sixth sense, imperfect as they might seem to be, are still infinitely better proofs than objective ones!!!

Khamis wrote:

"You misunderstand"

I didn't misunderstand anything. Instead, you tend to have people misunderstand that you are pro-doping and actually finally believe that you are so despite all your later pleas and cries to the opposite!!!!

"I'm pretty sure I've consistently asked you for objectivity, as well as authoritative sources, from the beginning, and you understood it correctly from the beginning, often quoting it back to me. Your initial response was to say your brand of subjectivity was superior, that objectivity is really an ILLUSION anyway, and that you alone were already a sufficiently qualified authority, and there is no need to look at sport performance."

And I gave you 3rd party extremely experienced (compared to you!) independent expert's opinions, a grand total of 2 and possibly more showing both objective evidences together with their subjective interpretation which is as good as objective in actual actuality that anthropogenic RF and EMFs suppresses human cells/organs in all space-time which makes suppressing sport performance a foregone conclusion since you need to utilize your cells and organs to exercise and do sports!!! So I had you DOUBLE objectivity if you would like to call it!!!! While I admit their expert views are still illusion but I explicitly mentioned to you that those were 'accurate illusions' or illusions of a HIGHER-ORDER existence and consciousness those kinds that definitely trump and beat LOWER-ORDER mere sport physiology findings from non-EMF trained sports scientists. But miraculously as always, you claim all these information can be overlooked despite being a baby in the realm of EMFs!!!! If I can even get Ross Tucker, a well respected sport scientist previously featured on LRC to give favorably expert interpretation in an independent manner with no fear of political/financial repercussions from his government of the susceptibility of EMFs in sport performance, I guess you and your hypocrisy will be put to burial!!!

You also fail to admit that the fact that you seem to have trouble believing anthropogenic RF and EMF harms sport performance might not necessarily be due to a gross lack of scientific research and interest in this area given its 100-year history but rather due to a gross unfair and unjust or malevolent suppression of such research and their findings/information due only to political/financial/economic/social repercussions!!! You yourself admit that all of Google's searches turn up as 'no harmful effect' right?? Why don't you employ a different line of thought and think out of box this way?? Why can't you think your government of whichever country that might be compromising the truth to you rather than that there are no present day objective evidence of harm on sport performance??

"I'm also pretty certain I informed you of my tendency to strip all posts of all their subjectivity, looking only for objective facts, evidence, and controlled observations -- as I already have a sufficient personal supply of my own subjectivity. I generally do this for "experts" too -- if they are unable to support their "expert" opinions with facts, evidence, and observations, I tend to put these opinions off to the side, until they can be corroborated or objectively supported."

LOL, you definitely didn't admit you had subjectivity in you until after I applied pressure on you with my superior reason and persuasion regarding 'interpretation of objective facts' which requires more than just an ordinary dose of subjectivity. I invoke 'your own subjectivity' using my reasoning skills on you to force your hand and your admittance!!! And finally I even silence and confound your reasoning ability when I asked you whether God can be objectively proven and even you knew that you finally lost the argument because everybody in this world save atheists and agnostics have the innate and accurate ability to know God exist subjectively with no objective proof!!! Since God is the highest consciousness and existence and which requires no sequential objective proof being faithfully proven by the hearts and souls of mankind from the outset, that means subjectivity is the King of Proofs, the emotions, the feelings, the sixth sense, imperfect as they might seem to be, are still infinitely better proofs than objective ones!!!

rekrunner wrote:

Khamis wrote:

No what???

Be clear!!! I asked about your YES or NO responses about issues like God/Jesus, Salazar, NOPer, Christianity, RF/EMF and sport performance.

Which does your NO refer??

Do you mean NO in that you don't believe in Jesus/God nor true Christianity???

Or that you don't believe the Salazar is pro-doping or that he violated sexually Kara or otherwise??

Or that you don't think anthropogenic RF and EMF harms sport performance??

Given your pedantic and scrupulous semantical nature, I'm surprised you gave me a 'NO' answer without referring to a specific subject. You seem very evasive and escapist the way I see it.

If you want me to be more clear in my answer, be more clear in your questions. You asked me for a YES/NO answer, before asking me any YES/NO questions.

Then, to illustrate by example, you edited one of my previous one sentence answers, that you don't want to hear, and expanded it into a lengthy paragraph of the kind of answer you want to hear -- quite the opposite of YES/NO.

Jesus/God/Salazar/Kara/RF/EMF/sport performance are all off-topic -- although I will note that Salazar considers himself a devout Catholic.

Let's get back to Katir and his whereabouts failures. I believe he committed three in one year.