WA don't consider them women or they would not be imposing conditions on their participation that address their male advantages.
They don't argue with Semenya's and such similar athletes' self-label, just the fact that the label doesn't change the reality they are effectively male. It is a distinction you are unable to grasp; your ideology won't let you.
Would you like to refer to the CAS decision to substantiate your views other wise we will all think you are an uneducated bigot; perish the thought.
Runragged has already done so in this thread. But we know you can't read.
Exactly and that is what these cases relate to as set out in the WA submission ; which you show nowt that you have read it.
You don't know what the case relates to. You show it with every dumb-ass comment.
It may have something to do with the ECRC 6 page press release that I presented and discussed. Also the CAS decision that I have made a precise reference to.
You on the other hand are still salivating that the moon is green cheese and that you bladder is up your colon.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.