How can at a time 47 year old O.J with a bad knee take down two significantly younger physically fit people? Nicole was 35 years old and ran 9 miles a day, Ron Goldman was 25 years old and reportedly a black belt in karate. It just doesn't add up.
Too obvious troll attempt - next time at least try to be creative about it.
Before OJ Simpson murder case, do posters here believe L.A. P.D. planted evidence in other case(s)? If posters admit L.A.P.D. planted evidence in other cases, then tell us why would L.A. law enforcement change their ways in this case? Some of you will say: That's how L.A.P.D. behaved, 1930 to 1980. This was a different era. Death of Christopher Wallace, b.k.a. Biggie Smalls was 34 months after murder of Nicole Brown Simpson. No one doubts L.A.P.D. and L.A. County Sheriff deputies were dirty regarding murder of Christopher Wallace.
I've seen OJ I'm person in the 90s, he's just a large, powerful individual. Of course he could tear through some unsuspecting waiter with a blade
No he could not. I was in O.J. Simpson Fan Club in mid-70s. By mid-80s he was a physically broken down person. I say him in person in 1979, by early 1990s, no way. Because you saw O.J. as a sideline reporter does not mean ... . Does not matter your opinion of O.J. as a fighter. I responded to a poster who stated it looked like preplanned murder(s). That is why I brought up Jason Simpson and mental health. Murder scene looked like a psychotic person tore everything and everyone apart. Because O.J. Simpson looked healthy to you on tv does not mean he was capable of hand to hand combat versus a karat black belt
Maybe the worst threat ever ! 33.5 million in civil decision tells me the criminal jurors got it WRONG !
About 10 years later he would have been done for...DNA evidence was newer at the time and now it has a strong hold in society. Oj's DNA says he totally did it...
No he could not. I was in O.J. Simpson Fan Club in mid-70s. By mid-80s he was a physically broken down person. I say him in person in 1979, by early 1990s, no way. Because you saw O.J. as a sideline reporter does not mean ... . Does not matter your opinion of O.J. as a fighter. I responded to a poster who stated it looked like preplanned murder(s). That is why I brought up Jason Simpson and mental health. Murder scene looked like a psychotic person tore everything and everyone apart. Because O.J. Simpson looked healthy to you on tv does not mean he was capable of hand to hand combat versus a karat black belt
That's evidence of your fairness on this topic...
I believe you responded to my post. How many card carry members of OJ Simpson's Fan Club from 1973 are there on here? Isn't it better for me to be honest?
Except for a few questionable days in OJ's life, we would be celebrating his 11,xxx carry yards in NFL today and celebrating OJ on USC's 4 x 440 yard relay. I guess, today is a day to talk about his criminal case, 1994 to 1995.
Most people give it little thought but most petty criminal and criminal cases in U.S. are settled because the accused pleads guilty. Which cases go to trial? Cases with a combination of weak evidence and high profile cases. If not for OJ's alleged domestic abuse involving Ms. Nicole Brown Simpson, there may never have been an arrest in said murder(s).
Murder cases with a few or several eye witnesses, defense attorney does his or her best salesperson job and convinces their client(s) to take a 5 to 25 year sentence. That is justice in U.S. We hear about the weak sensational cases. Only weak cases go to trial.
Police, sheriff department, state troopers on state level work as a team with prosecuting attorneys. Over 80% of the time, the goal is to get defendant to take a guilty plea before pre-trial. Cops are human. The longer a case stretches out, the more mistakes by law enforcement are revealed. The U.S. criminal court system is an adversarial system. If law enforcement are not able to twist arm of defendant, so to speak into admitting guilt, attorneys need to plan for a trial and tell a narrative, an entertaining narrative. It is up to prosecutors to put on a bit of a show. Johnnie Cochran, F.L. Bailey and Barry Scheck out-matched L.A. County prosecutors. Every man and every woman need to know their limitations. Prosecutors were out-smarted. If prosecutors are going up against successful attorneys with plenty of resources, prosecution should have done what L.A. prosecutors do every day, offer Simpson a plea deal he could have lived with. Did L.A. County every offer Simpson 10 years served for each murder concurrently? Would Simpson have taken that deal? Don't be mad at Simpson, law enforcement screwed up.
He is guilty. Modern DNA can prove that. There is also enough evidence to convict. In light of the earlier Rodney King incident they didn't want a repeat of the riots to happen in LA again.
He is guilty. Modern DNA can prove that. There is also enough evidence to convict. In light of the earlier Rodney King incident they didn't want a repeat of the riots to happen in LA again.
The lower court also had a different outcome.
I see this all the time, but if the killer is not police, there would not have been riots. Why would the protest the conviction of O.J. by a mostly black jury? O.J. also didn’t have any connection to the black community.
If not for OJ's alleged domestic abuse involving Ms. Nicole Brown Simpson, there may never have been an arrest in said murder(s).......
.....Don't be mad at Simpson, law enforcement screwed up.
"alleged domestic abuse"?
Simpson killed two people. I'll choose to be mad at him.
Your anger is in the wrong direction:
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were made at Black people on jury. Note: there were White people on jury.
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were mad at Black people because many Black people believed OJ, not guilty.
* Some people after 1995 criminal court verdict were mad at Simpson legal team. They couldn't articulate why. Basically no one had seen criminal law attorneys argue so well on behalf of a client.
*** WEAK CASES GO TO TRIAL. Even though no accused person has to plead guilty, attorneys will not argue on your behalf if there is nothing to argue. Weak cases either are thrown out of court by pre-trial or prosecution stops moving forward before pretrial or case is resolved by plea bargain. Most guilty convictions in U.S. are due to criminal defendant pleading guilty. L.A. prosecutors failed to offer Simpson a punish he could live with. Case should have never gone to trial. Case was too weak.
Simpson killed two people. I'll choose to be mad at him.
Your anger is in the wrong direction:
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were made at Black people on jury. Note: there were White people on jury.
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were mad at Black people because many Black people believed OJ, not guilty.
* Some people after 1995 criminal court verdict were mad at Simpson legal team. They couldn't articulate why. Basically no one had seen criminal law attorneys argue so well on behalf of a client.
*** WEAK CASES GO TO TRIAL. Even though no accused person has to plead guilty, attorneys will not argue on your behalf if there is nothing to argue. Weak cases either are thrown out of court by pre-trial or prosecution stops moving forward before pretrial or case is resolved by plea bargain. Most guilty convictions in U.S. are due to criminal defendant pleading guilty. L.A. prosecutors failed to offer Simpson a punish he could live with. Case should have never gone to trial. Case was too weak.
I'm mad at OJ because he killed two people after domestic abusing his wife/ex-wife over years (and new info about others coming out today). Not "allegedly".
I have no idea, and neither do you apparently, what you're talking about.
How can at a time 47 year old O.J with a bad knee take down two significantly younger physically fit people? Nicole was 35 years old and ran 9 miles a day, Ron Goldman was 25 years old and reportedly a black belt in karate. It just doesn't add up.
Well, surprise for one thing. Adrenaline on the part of Simpson maybe? Not sure a woman running 9 miles is a match for a pretty good sized dude wielding a knife.
Also, I just read a long bio on Goldman and no mention of a black belt.
If this is your case for why OJ could not have done it, I hope you are not a lawyer.
Simpson killed two people. I'll choose to be mad at him.
Your anger is in the wrong direction:
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were made at Black people on jury. Note: there were White people on jury.
* After 1995 criminal court verdict, many people were mad at Black people because many Black people believed OJ, not guilty.
* Some people after 1995 criminal court verdict were mad at Simpson legal team. They couldn't articulate why. Basically no one had seen criminal law attorneys argue so well on behalf of a client.
*** WEAK CASES GO TO TRIAL. Even though no accused person has to plead guilty, attorneys will not argue on your behalf if there is nothing to argue. Weak cases either are thrown out of court by pre-trial or prosecution stops moving forward before pretrial or case is resolved by plea bargain. Most guilty convictions in U.S. are due to criminal defendant pleading guilty. L.A. prosecutors failed to offer Simpson a punish he could live with. Case should have never gone to trial. Case was too weak.
O.J. butchered 2 people including a person that was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. If it was someone else, the prosecution would have pursued the death penalty. The prosecution agreeing to some type of a plea deal would have been a slap in the face to the Goldmans and Browns. Take another look at the crime scene photos and see if you still think a plea deal was in order.
How can at a time 47 year old O.J with a bad knee take down two significantly younger physically fit people? Nicole was 35 years old and ran 9 miles a day, Ron Goldman was 25 years old and reportedly a black belt in karate. It just doesn't add up.
PayPal Donations: russak_vanya@mail.ruMusic by Cazar Beatz: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYIV7Vs0_yk&ab_channel=CazarBeatzMichael Moorer vs. George Forema...
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.