The DOJ, supposedly 'weaponized' against Republicans, just indicted the Dem mayor of New York City.
Once again proving Rs are absurd creatures who get almost nothing correct.
-
112
-
Newname wrote:
they're eating the DOGs wrote:
Someone is remarkably blind to their own reasoning deficits. Maybe someone doesn't understand the "nuance" of forced binary choice decisions. It is impossible to against the selection of one choice and without being for the other choice.
Try that in English.
You ain't William Faulkner
I left out one word "be". "It is impossible to BE against......." And you were thrown by it.
I suggested that you ask an adult for help but that post was deleted.
51 -
Fat Alvin's case was far too weak - the previous, also a Democrat, prosecutor realized it was incredibly weak. But Bragg charged it and got a sympathetic jury. It's the equivalent of a KGB show trial.
19 -
almost boomer wrote:
Women for Trump 14 wrote:
1. I'm a long-time Dem anyway. Bullsh*t. Once a Trumper, always a Trumper. But I'll be voting for Trump because he's much better than the alternative.
2. Why should America get involved in a pointless European conflict? Says the low IQ voter.
As I stated, I'm a long-time Dem. I didn't vote for Trump in either 2016 or 2020.
And please explain your expertise on the Ukraine.
410 -
Women for Trump 14 wrote:
almost boomer wrote:
As I stated, I'm a long-time Dem. I didn't vote for Trump in either 2016 or 2020.
And please explain your expertise on the Ukraine.
You say a lot of things that are not true.
91 -
Women for Trump 14 wrote:
almost boomer wrote:
As I stated, I'm a long-time Dem. I didn't vote for Trump in either 2016 or 2020.
SHHHHHHHH you clown.
Stop wasting everyone’s time.
92 -
Updated Vegas odds after the race tightens back up
Harris -120
Trump Even
21 -
Decent opportunities
16 -
Brishens wrote:
Women for Trump 14 wrote:
As I stated, I'm a long-time Dem. I didn't vote for Trump in either 2016 or 2020.
And please explain your expertise on the Ukraine.
You say a lot of things that are not true.
What's your 5000 PR?
07 -
Prime posters only wrote:
Ok, what are her chances?
She better hope the stock market does better the next month - many more days like this and sentiment will turn fast and hard.
24 -
#FTLH
27 -
Another night of senseless gibberish.
Still no record of her arguing cases in front of a judge- she would have got laughed out of court from the first time her word salads came out.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.18 -
It was a trainwreck. The woman can't any questions without talking in riddles mixed in with word salads.
She's TOAST.
Mean tweets 2024!
17 -
19
-
Flagpole wrote:
Tea Party Trevorr wrote:
IT is about TRUMP!
The reason that I know this is because if Kamala Harris was not running you would be saying the same stuff about Josh Shapiro. Or Joe Biden. Or Mayor Pete. The stuff you are pointing to is just left vs right politics. The Dem candidate does not matter whatsoever.
But there is something unique about Trump that allows him to be so vile, corrupt and offensive and yet he never loses his basement of 40% of the GOP. No other GOP candidate has a chance against Trump because the base loves him so much. Why do they love him so much when he is so vile, immoral, corrupt and has demonstrated himself to be a colossal failure in business and politics? This is what I try to understand.
Why could no GOP not penetrate the cult-like lover for this clown?
He is an outloud overt racist, and because of that, he has given white people who have felt that way, the permission to support such vile hatred...and they love him for it. They don't want to have to pretend anymore that they believe all people were created equal. They like their unearned success (being white), and they want it to stay that way.
Trump just said at a rally that they (the Haitians in Springfield, OH) need to be sent back, and that was followed by chants of "send them back, send them back." Um...those Haitians are here LEGALLY, and most of the people in Springfield and the REPUBLICAN Ohio Governor have been glad they are here. They helped the economy in Springfield...and it was the right thing to do...we don't have enough workers here. We need to bring in even MORE LEGAL immigrants like these people from Haiti (Not Haitia, you idiot, JD Vance).
Before Trump came along, I had no idea HOW STUPID 40% of the country is. It's really unbelievable. They want an autocracy. Well, there are those around the world that they can move to if they really want that.
I was tuning into some short interviews with some undecideds.. and boy the % of stupid Americans far surpasses 40%. Most of those interviewees repeated the same thing that they needed to do their "own research" because they didn't know enough yet. 😆 I mean holy cr@p, start with Google and make your way to the respective candidate's official pages. Watch the debate. Watch clips of their rallies and interviews. Listen to what economists have to say about their plans. But no... most of them are gonna be fed their research by whatever social media character they follow. Our country is full of dumba$$es. Another reason to vote D - more investment in pre-K and basic education.
81 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Another night of senseless gibberish.
Still no record of her arguing cases in front of a judge- she would have got laughed out of court from the first time her word salads came out.
You could get your Trump safe space recap from your social media heroes, or you could actually watch the interview yourself which you definitely did not do. There is absolutely no way you watch her and conclude she isn't a superior candidate. She speaks with clarity, goes into substance and everything she says makes sense. Meanwhile trump's "economic" speech in NC was so bad and repetitive that even FOX News pulled the cord on it early.
The propaganda machine works flawlessly on you... every time they see Harris crushing it, they quickly spin up some crazy BS with some 10 second cut of her talking and start spreading the lies on social media, and usually in sync. You get spoon fed that garbage 24/7. So again, GTFO you aren't convincing anyone and you are going to be shell-shocked when she destroys him.
Hell, I don't even think you watched any of those embedded clips 😂 and you probably don't even read the social media posts anymore. You know it's coming from some BS spreader and you are conditioned to just pass it on. Dance monkey, dance!
This post was edited 6 minutes after it was posted.91 -
agip wrote:
The DOJ, supposedly 'weaponized' against Republicans, just indicted the Dem mayor of New York City.
Once again proving Rs are absurd creatures who get almost nothing correct.
Just a red herring!
30 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Voting matters wrote:
We don’t want it enforced selectively. Putting the expense in one column or another did not enrich Trump or defraud New York. From a tax perspective it was a non-issue and would not have been enforced against anyone else.
New York indicts something like 1000 people a year on felony falsifying business records charges. Should New York ignore all of their crimes as well?
First off, falsifying business records is a misdemeanor, not a felony. But just for arguments sake, please provide evidence of your claim. In particular those cases where the government was not harmed and the accused did not benefit.
03 -
Voting matters wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
New York indicts something like 1000 people a year on felony falsifying business records charges. Should New York ignore all of their crimes as well?
First off, falsifying business records is a misdemeanor, not a felony. But just for arguments sake, please provide evidence of your claim. In particular those cases where the government was not harmed and the accused did not benefit.
Did the homework for you. 30 cases (including Trump’s) over the past 15 years. Almost all of which were for insurance fraud or forms of tax evasion where the individual financially benefitted and / or the government was shorted taxes, neither of which occurred here.
03
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.