Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

"culturalism" = Flagpole head explosion

Dude...just consider this...you want people to be let in the country based on merit. Perhaps you should treat people and accept them based on merit also. Dislike an individual person if they do something you don't like, but to be against whole groups of people based on some perceived group dynamic, is not right from any main point of view, secular or religious.

~"Half of Trump supporters belong to the Basket of Irredeemable Deplorables". -- Hillary Clinton

I don't think you have the credibility to lecture anyone on judging groups of people. No one on the left does. Should we discuss "white privilege"?

Of course I never said I was against whole groups of people, except those who believe in the supremacy of Sharia Law . Our way of life is incompatible with Sharia Law so we can not "coexist" with those who insist that it be the law of the land.

DiscoGary wrote:

My world view is correct because I can predict outcomes.

OK, Gary.

Make a few non-obvious predictions for us. We'll see how many hits you get.

Your racist tribe: https://nativenewsonline.net/currents/armed-trump-supporters-confront-american-indian-arizona-lawmakers-state-capitol/

Fat hurts wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

My world view is correct because I can predict outcomes.

OK, Gary.

Make a few non-obvious predictions for us. We'll see how many hits you get.

Gary agrees with maybe 15-20% of the population. Everyone else is "The Other". lolol

DiscoGary wrote:

~"Half of Trump supporters belong to the Basket of Irredeemable Deplorables". -- Hillary Clinton

Of course I never said I was against whole groups of people, except those who believe in the supremacy of Sharia Law .

Except .... There is always an exception in the mind of a racist.

Fat hurts wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

My world view is correct because I can predict outcomes.

OK, Gary.

Make a few non-obvious predictions for us. We'll see how many hits you get.

GDP growth under Trump will be greater than under Obama because of the following:

1. Fewer regulations, especially on the energy sector which effects all others.

2. Lower corporate taxes.

GDP growth peaked at 2.6% under Obama. I will AVERAGE above that under Trump.

Minorities will not suffer under Trump, because Trump and his supporters are NOT the deplorable racists you think we are.

Let's see, one more to get to a "few".

Long term - many years from now when me and all the other old-white-conservative people have died, which liberals think is needed to usher in the new era of Utopian tolerance and equality ... will instead usher in an era of hatred, intolerance, and division ... because young people today are not being taught to accept each other as individuals ... they are being taught to treat everyone as either a victim or a villain, so that the victims can justify taking from the villains, and everyone will struggle to cast the other guy into the villain basket while trying to avoid being cast into it himself. Many of us older people believe that everyone should be treated equally under the law, and that no one deserves other people's stuff, and when we're gone that foundation of principled civility will be gone... leaving society to rip itself apart.

BONUS prediction:

Liberals will be wrong. On everything! That's the one universal constant.

Deplorable Gary wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

~"Half of Trump supporters belong to the Basket of Irredeemable Deplorables". -- Hillary Clinton

Of course I never said I was against whole groups of people, except those who believe in the supremacy of Sharia Law .

Except .... There is always an exception in the mind of a racist.

When you return from living in a country run by Sharia Law, then we'll discuss it. Perhaps you would like to see how gays, women, heretics, and non-believers are treated there.

DiscoGary wrote:

Deplorable Gary wrote:

Except .... There is always an exception in the mind of a racist.

When you return from living in a country run by Sharia Law, then we'll discuss it. Perhaps you would like to see how gays, women, heretics, and non-believers are treated there.

The only person who ass-u-me-ed that belief system would take over the country is you. . . . How about them Mormons—multiple-marriage? How about the State of New York, finally, stopping to allow adult men to marry 14 year old girls?

Deplorable Gary wrote:

The only person who ass-u-me-ed that belief system would take over the country is you. . . . How about them Mormons—multiple-marriage? How about the State of New York, finally, stopping to allow adult men to marry 14 year old girls?

What about them?

quote]Softie wrote:

Lots of assumptions in there, brother.

It's just the way it is. College educated voters were more likely to vote for HRC as were poor people. Nothing wrong with being poor or without a college degree.[/quote]

Stats are funny...

What gets lost in all this uneducated (HS or less) voters supporting Trump is that that group only accounted for about 18% of the electorate and Trump only won 51/46% which means about 12 million people with HS diplomas or less voted for Trump and about 11 million voted for Clinton. Not really much of a mandate.

If you move the line for "educated voters" to those with "Associates Degree/Some College," a different picture develops in these two largest groups.

Associates Degree/Some College (32% of group) - Trump won group - 52% /43%

College Grad (32% of group) - Clinton won group - 49%/45%

Post-Grad (18% of group - same as HS or less) - Clinton won group - 58%/37%

So with "College Grad" and "Post-Grad" counted as "educated," 55% of Clinton's voters were educated compared to 46% of Trump's.

If you move the line to include "Associates Degree/Some College" as "educated" then 83% of Clinton's voters were "educated" compared to 80% of Trump's.

Hardloper wrote:

Deplorable Gary wrote:

The only person who ass-u-me-ed that belief system would take over the country is you. . . . How about them Mormons—multiple-marriage? How about the State of New York, finally, stopping to allow adult men to marry 14 year old girls?

What about them?

Are you Disco Gary? . . . Good to know that is one of your aliases.

1) I have told you before that Hillary defined the basket of deplorables, so if you are in it as you once said, then that's on you. She should not have said that, but if you're in that basket as she defined it, that's on you.

2) I absolutely can lecture others on not judging whole groups of people.

3) Your Sharia Law comment is ridiculous. Do you question Muslims in America about their view on Sharia Law before you judge them?

Flagpole wrote:

...

Do you question Muslims in America about their view on Sharia Law before you judge them?

Do you question white Americans about their view on Muslims before you judge them?

Hey wait. Isn't that how this whole gotcha game got started?

Checkmate.

Here's what Wray (Trump appointee) thinks about Nunes' memo:

http://polipace.com/2018/01/29/fbi-director-views-classified-memo-says-inaccurate/

You're so stupid. That's why you like Trump.

Example: Trump on Nuculars.

“Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I’m one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it’s true! — but when you’re a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are — nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what’s going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what’s going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it’s four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it’s all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don’t, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.”

I'm still trying to figure out why you guys keep bragging about losing to a bunch of stupid people.

Deplorable Gary wrote:

Hardloper wrote:

What about them?

Are you Disco Gary? . . . Good to know that is one of your aliases.

I'm actually a Russian troll, brah. I was just wondering what your point was regarding Mormons and New Yorkers... Guess there wasn't one.

DiscoGary wrote:

GDP growth peaked at 2.6% under Obama. [It] will AVERAGE above that under Trump.

Well, DJT promised 4% growth, so it'll *have* to, no?

OTOH he also promised he'd release his tax returns (it's on video on YouTube), so I'm not gonna hold my breath...

Trump and his supporters are NOT the deplorable racists you think we are.

Oh, sure they are. Not *all* of them, certainly, but plenty. Don't be silly.

Lots of people are unhappy that they and their children are not advancing the way that most families did after WWII. As is typical of humans everywhere, in every time, these disappointed folks want to blame The Other for their plight. And who is more conveniently The Other than a brown person?

Hardloper wrote:

Deplorable Gary wrote:

Are you Disco Gary? . . . Good to know that is one of your aliases.

I'm actually a Russian troll, brah. I was just wondering what your point was regarding Mormons and New Yorkers... Guess there wasn't one.

YAWN . . . we know you are a Russian troll.

What part of "You were not asked a question" do you need translated to Russian?