Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

its_baddude wrote:

This story means nothing to Republicans. It is intended to feed the lib ego to reinforce how evil the poor white man is. It could have been written as:

Trump suffers big losses with poor black and Hispanic voters and reinforce how the Democratic party does nothing for poor blacks and Hispanics and yet they keep supported them.

This is nonsense. The statistics in the article show Trump gaining with "Nonwhite or Hispanic" voters relative to the baseline.

Fat hurts wrote:

Rigged for Trump wrote:

AHEM . . .

Or maybe Flagpole was interpreting numbers CORRECTLY while you are joining Salllly in the moron's club as someone who has absolutely no idea what these numbers mean.

- - -

"Oh my F'ing God! Did you really just interpret Trump winning 45% of the college graduate vote and 37% of the post-graduate study vote to mean that 45% of Trump voters have a college degree and 37% of them have done some post-graduate study?!?

Oh my F'ing God!

///

I guess it goes without saying that you are not one of those with a college education."

Aw. You ruined it. The Trumpers were starting to pile on. I wanted to see how many would fall for it.

But I really wanted to see if a single one of them would notice their error and point it out.

Most intelligent people would realize that when the data for the percentage of voters with college degrees is presented is relatively close and the election being close that Flagole’s claims were ridiculous. Most people understand it.

It’s kind of like saying the trump tax cuts help the wealthy when you really mean that they didn’t help the lower class.

Facts hurt wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So it was confusing because Flagpole said "college educated" instead of "white college educated"?

I guess I can see how that would confuse Trump voters.

Regardless of the presentation, the fact remains that the numbers presented by FP are incorrect.

CORRECT!!

Flagpole wrote:

Chin up and Pull up champ wrote:

Flagpole - you can make idiotic statements like guaranteeing Hillary would win. You can make erroneous claims about just about everything. You can lie about stuff left and right. You can make recurring annoying statements like "Mueller is coming ...Trump is done" - You can even be a dolt. You can even be a little turd. But we still love you, bro!. We love you to the hilt!

Here is the truth distilled for you and for everyone...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Here, idiot- from a guy that miiiiight know more than you...

FP = DB wrote:

Facts hurt wrote:

Regardless of the presentation, the fact remains that the numbers presented by FP are incorrect.

CORRECT!!

Regardless of Failpole's damage control, his original stat that only 19% of Trump voters have a college degree was not just wrong, it was so far off that anyone should know without looking it up - very sad!

FP = DB wrote:

Facts hurt wrote:

Regardless of the presentation, the fact remains that the numbers presented by FP are incorrect.

CORRECT!!

Notice Flag and Fat’s deflection from their statement’s inaccuracies? Hilarious. Such POS.

Flag: “19% of Trump voters had college degrees... 45% of Clinton voters had college degrees.”

Truth: Approximately 35-40% of both of their respective voters had college degrees.

Truth: Of all voters with college degrees, Clinton received about 50%, Trump received about 46%.

Truth: Of white voters with college degrees, Trump received about 50%, and Clinton received about 45%.

None of these truths are remotely close to Flagpole’s dilusional statement. He’s either an idiot, or lying. Either case should result in an apology to the board.

Hardloper wrote:

FP = DB wrote:

CORRECT!!

Regardless of Failpole's damage control, his original stat that only 19% of Trump voters have a college degree was not just wrong, it was so far off that anyone should know without looking it up - very sad!

^TrollLoper replying to himself

Facts hurt wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So it was confusing because Flagpole said "college educated" instead of "white college educated"?

I guess I can see how that would confuse Trump voters.

Regardless of the presentation, the fact remains that the numbers presented by FP are incorrect.

I'll admit, I'd like to see where FP got his numbers. The way he put it was, 19% of Trump voters have a college degree. At first glance, that sounds like a reasonable number because:

1) Only about 30% of Americans have a college degree

2) Hillary won the college-educated vote (by 5 or 6 points?).

But some back-of-the-envelope calculations show it's perhaps not so reasonable:

Popular vote:

Hillary 48%

Trump 46%

Other 6%

So for every 100 voters, 94 voted for either Trump or Hillary and 28 had a college degree (30% of 94).

Of those 28, roughly:

13 voted for Trump (47% of 28)

15 voted for Hillary (53% of 28)

So overall:

28% of Trump voters had a college degree (13 of 46)

31% of Hillary voters had a college degree (15 of 48)

I could be way off. These are very rough calculations and I don't have time to check them to see if I've made errors. And, it doesn't take into account that college-educated voters vote in higher numbers overall. So taking 30% of 94 is a little suspect.

Again, I'd like to see where FP got his numbers.

My guess is his 19% was from one of the primary exit polls, not the general election

Hardloper wrote:

My guess is his 19% was from one of the primary exit polls, not the general election

My guess it came out of his azz.

Truth in numbers wrote:

FP = DB wrote:

CORRECT!!

Notice Flag and Fat’s deflection from their statement’s inaccuracies? Hilarious. Such POS.

Flag: “19% of Trump voters had college degrees... 45% of Clinton voters had college degrees.”

Truth: Approximately 35-40% of both of their respective voters had college degrees.

Truth: Of all voters with college degrees, Clinton received about 50%, Trump received about 46%.

Truth: Of white voters with college degrees, Trump received about 50%, and Clinton received about 45%.

None of these truths are remotely close to Flagpole’s dilusional statement. He’s either an idiot, or lying. Either case should result in an apology to the board.

I love it how his followers just jumped on it like it was true without even Thinking about how ridiculous it was.

Lemmings.

Facts...

1) Trump's base = uneducated, poor white men from rural areas and their submissive wives

2) Not everyone who voted for Trump is a racist but if you STILL support Trump after all of his shenanigans you are a racist

3) If you still support Trump you are ignoring reality and likely lack critical thinking skills

4) If you still support Trump you have misogynistic tendencies and view women as second class citizens

5) If you support Trump’ tax plan and you don’t make > 500k per year or have a position as an executive in a Fortune 500 company you either don’t understand the plan, are an idiot, or both

6) If you are a Christian and support Trump you are a hypocrite

7) If you still support Trump you are among the 30% of the human population that craves authoritarian leadership because you like black & white thinking and, as stated above, lack critical thinking skills

These are the indisputable facts that all intelligent people from both ends of the political spectrum agree upon.

I like your pattern of keeping everything subjective in your posts, rather than objective data and facts. A lot of idiots will fall for that. So kudos to you for that strategy.

However...

Mueller isn’t coming.

The Clown is Flagpole.

Flagpole WILL BLOW HUS BRAINS OUT OVER POTUS45, DONALD J TRUMP!!

Tick, tick.

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

. . . OVER IQ45, DONALD J TRUMP!!

^Fixed

Facts Hurt wrote:

Truth in numbers wrote:

Notice Flag and Fat’s deflection from their statement’s inaccuracies? Hilarious. Such POS.

Flag: “19% of Trump voters had college degrees... 45% of Clinton voters had college degrees.”

Truth: Approximately 35-40% of both of their respective voters had college degrees.

Truth: Of all voters with college degrees, Clinton received about 50%, Trump received about 46%.

Truth: Of white voters with college degrees, Trump received about 50%, and Clinton received about 45%.

None of these truths are remotely close to Flagpole’s dilusional statement. He’s either an idiot, or lying. Either case should result in an apology to the board.

I love it how his followers just jumped on it like it was true without even Thinking about how ridiculous it was.

Lemmings.

Wrong. Cute, of course. But wrong.

Not a single anti-Trump poster "jumped on it like it was true". Some simply pointed out that Salllly's post was hilariously wrong (and noted that many Trumpettes did indeed "jump on (Salllly's moronic post) like it was true".

Not one.

Dare you to find a single post that defends Flagpole's numbers (not counting FP).

///

Now that you've tried to find one and failed miserably, care to come back on here and admit that you were lying or ignorant (or both)? Nah, that would take a non-zero level of integrity - something that Trumpettes do not have.

Triggered much Trump supporting snowflake? LOL. I suppose your just emulating the Snowflake & Chief—Donald J. Trump. He lashes out at the free press over every little story just like the authoritarian dictators he emulates.

Let me guess at some of your explanations for his recent failures of leadership—the only reason the government shutdown occurred was because we don’t have 100% complete one party control like all Trumpets desire, am I right? We need total obedience and homogeneity in government like mother Russia—right snowflake?

But here's the truth wrote:

Facts Hurt wrote:

I love it how his followers just jumped on it like it was true without even Thinking about how ridiculous it was.

Lemmings.

Wrong. Cute, of course. But wrong.

Not a single anti-Trump poster "jumped on it like it was true". Some simply pointed out that Salllly's post was hilariously wrong (and noted that many Trumpettes did indeed "jump on (Salllly's moronic post) like it was true".

Not one.

Dare you to find a single post that defends Flagpole's numbers (not counting FP).

///

Now that you've tried to find one and failed miserably, care to come back on here and admit that you were lying or ignorant (or both)? Nah, that would take a non-zero level of integrity - something that Trumpettes do not have.

Sorry, brah.

Nobody sided with Sally. They simply pointed out that the percentage of voters data that was presented was proof that your glorious leader was WRONG again.

Now go back to licking his boots.

Hi, sheep. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid. And nick your doors, and turn your devices off at night so the RUSSIANS DONT COME AND GET YOU!! HAHAHA

Mueller isn’t coming.

The clown is Flagpole.

Flagpole WILL BLOW HIS BRAINS OUT OVER POTUS45, DONALD J TRUMP!!

Tick, tick.

EPlC Flagpole wrote:

I'm a, sheep. I keep drinking that TRUMP Kool-Aid. And I unlock my doors, and turn my devices on at night so the RUSSIANS KNOW NOT TO SHOOT ME WHEN THEY COME!! HAHAHA

Mueller IS coming.

The clown is TRUMP.

HARDLOPER WILL BLOW HIS BRAINS OUT OVER LOCKED-UP IQ-45, DONALD J TRUMP!!

Tick, tick.

+1