Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Hello Hillary lovers. Still butt hurt?

Hahahahahahaha!!!!!

How’s that schumer shutdown to favor illegals over citizens working out for you?

Democrats lose again!!!

Hahahahahahaha!!!!

The Guru Matt James wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

Yep. It would be terrible if the people living and working in our country were allowed to vote in elections. Completely contrary to American ideals.

So you support open borders?

DiscoGary wrote:

So you support open borders?

So you support building a wall down the middle of the Rio Grande for more than 1000 miles!!! Them's fighting words.

DiscoGary wrote:

. . . .open borders?

Trump prefers open borders.

Schumer on Sunday said that in the hours before a shutdown, Trump “picked a number for the wall, and I accepted it.”

“It would be hard to imagine a much more reasonable compromise,” he added. “All along, the president saying, ‘Well, I’ll do DACA, dreamers, in return for the wall.’ He’s got it. He can’t take yes for an answer. That’s why we’re here.”

The Guru Matt James wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

Yep. It would be terrible if the people living and working in our country were allowed to vote in elections. Completely contrary to American ideals.

What American Ideals? What a hilarious phrase.

DiscoGary wrote:

The Guru Matt James wrote:

Yep. It would be terrible if the people living and working in our country were allowed to vote in elections. Completely contrary to American ideals.

So you support open borders?

Yes.

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

Gary, how can you speculate on how many people are part of DACA? There is a discrete number of approved applicants. These are the only people who would be impacted by legislation that codifies DACA.

Count Chocula wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

Gary, how can you speculate on how many people are part of DACA? There is a discrete number of approved applicants. These are the only people who would be impacted by legislation that codifies DACA.

They "calculated" the 3.6 million by using the wild-ass guess Trump made about how many illegals voted for Hillary.

Looks like they are going to reopen and kick the can a couple weeks.

"McConnell laid out his offer in remarks on the Senate floor: Should these issues not be resolved by the time the funding bill before us expires on February 8, assuming that the government remains open, it would be his intention to proceed to legislation that would address the expiring Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, border security and related issues."

Sure, McConnell "intends" to get a deal done on DACA.

Let's say they never pass a bill on DACA, which has wide support from Americans across party lines.

The Democrats will have lost the battle to get it passed but won the political game showing voters what they care about.

This is an issue that favors Dems in swing districts and states.

Or let's say DACA does get passed.

Then good job Democrats getting it done.

It will work like this. Congress will pass a bill which includes DACA—with a path to citizenship—and CHIP in exchange for ~10-15 billion for a wall. But it won't a Trump wall; it will be improvements to the existing wall, with advanced surveillance, and no wall along a Native reservation that crosses the border, and no wall down the middle of the Rio Grande—republicans in Texan will be happy with that because those who own private property along the river will not lose their view or access to the river; property rights are protected.

After the above, a more normal budget will get passed. The trick is for Congress to keep Trump out of the decision making process by creating a budget with enough votes to go over any veto he attempts to impose.

You have an employee. You have given him several crucial assignments, and he has waited until the very last minute, handing you a botched job, blowing one deadline after the other. He also hates your clients, and you can see it in his work, because all of his efforts are focused on maliciously ruining their lives. And of course, he's a huge gas-lighter, blaming your other employees, your clients, and you for his failures. And on top of that, though you are paying him a salary, someone else is paying him much more, so while he takes your money, he doesn't really even work for you. Sound familiar? Maybe you should fire him this year.

Night Observer wrote:

Can't Stump the Trump wrote:

Pretty much. Flagpole has said that all Democrats are for border security. The 14,000 border patrol agents who endorsed Mr. Trump say the wall is crucial. The choice is easy. M.A.G.A.

As long as we don't have to front the money and that is stipulated, let Mexico do it, approve it, and lets move on M.A.G.A.

(Just make sure we don't pay a dime for it)

The devil is in the details. The GOP would want to apply some toll bridge accounting practices and stipulate that we will “bill” Mexico later and indirectly through a NAFTA adjustment, etc. they would never agree to go procure the funds from Mexico beforehand, because well Mexico and the world would just laugh at them like they are now.

DiscoGary wrote:

L L wrote:

...

The Dems do not want the shutdown.

....

Of course they do. They think they can blame it on Republicans like they always do, and get Reps to cave like they always do. But there's a new sheriff in town. I don't think that will work this time.

Democrats are putting the interests of foreign citizens over the interests of US citizens (voters) and the US military. Good luck with that.

Gary - no different than the last 5 shutdowns due to GOP “refusal to cooperate”. At the end of the day, Trump, according to his own words, is responsible for this mess and thus he is expected to lead it’s clean up. Both sides lose political capital in this risky game but without question the Republicans lose more. If they are “forced” to take the nuclear option then the future of the party is sealed. I’ll remind you again this is the first time there has been a shut down under a government fully controlled by one party. Trump loses. But don’t worry, he can’t stand doing presidential work and will get this resolved ASAP so he can go back to playing golf.

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

You are an idiot. Take a look at the general election county vote stats. Numerous counties that were won by Trump were easily won by Obama twice. It’s a flip flopping nation, and the pendulum will swing faster the other way than it has ever before.

Count Chocula wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If I were a Democrat, I would give up everything for DACA because once DACA gets done and those "kids" who are actually adults become voters, and there are about 3.6 million of them, not 800,0000, then Democrats will win most elections because they will get most of the illegal vote. After that, they can take power, grant amnesty to the 15 million other illegals, run the table on elections, tear down the wall, open the borders and finish the destruction of the US.

Once amnesty is granted, the game is over.

Gary, how can you speculate on how many people are part of DACA? There is a discrete number of approved applicants. These are the only people who would be impacted by legislation that codifies DACA.

Because he is intellectually lazy and feels speculating is always good enough.

Yawners wrote:

You have an employee. You have given him several crucial assignments, and he has waited until the very last minute, handing you a botched job, blowing one deadline after the other. He also hates your clients, and you can see it in his work, because all of his efforts are focused on maliciously ruining their lives. And of course, he's a huge gas-lighter, blaming your other employees, your clients, and you for his failures. And on top of that, though you are paying him a salary, someone else is paying him much more, so while he takes your money, he doesn't really even work for you. Sound familiar? Maybe you should fire him this year.

I think you have to clarify that’s Trunp for these knuckleheads.

Trollminator wrote:

Yawners wrote:

You have an employee. You have given him several crucial assignments, and he has waited until the very last minute, handing you a botched job, blowing one deadline after the other. He also hates your clients, and you can see it in his work, because all of his efforts are focused on maliciously ruining their lives. And of course, he's a huge gas-lighter, blaming your other employees, your clients, and you for his failures. And on top of that, though you are paying him a salary, someone else is paying him much more, so while he takes your money, he doesn't really even work for you. Sound familiar? Maybe you should fire him this year.

I think you have to clarify that’s Trunp for these knuckleheads.

Never heard of hin.

Trollminator wrote:“bill” Mexico later and indirectly through a NAFTA adjustment, etc.

The U.S. can't arbitrarily change the terms of NAFTA. Mexico has already won the trade scuffle.

Let's imagine some unfortunate idiot somewhere in Trump's administration is assigned this task. America's top-5 trading partner will not be the least bit happy about it and use their strength as a very important trading partner (top-5) to show their displeasure.

The only people harmed in this scenario are working Americans. Another recessionary policy.

Also don't forget Trump's chief of staff just told Fox zombies that there will be no wall as promised on the campaign trail. You have to wonder how the chief of staff's unilateral decision is going to play with the racists in Trump's cabinet.

L L wrote:

Looks like they are going to reopen and kick the can a couple weeks.

The only question left is how many "riders" got attached to the CR. This seems to be the new Congressional shotgun wedding.

A party controls all three chambers and cannot even pass an annual budget. What a mess. November is too far off for this to matter in the election.