Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
Trumpettes are NOT Americans!
obvious problem wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
I don't really care if you respond or not. I also never said I "like" Donald Trump. I tolerate him because he's getting things done that I would like to see done, or at least trying to given the opposition from the douche's in both parties . I would rather have seen someone else there. And anyone but HRC. He does have good taste in women though I can't fault him for that.
In other words "the ends justify the means" which is the only sane argument left for supporting Trump at this point. All the rest is just trolling.
Yep. He's throwing any integrity away (or he never had any to begin with) by supporting a criminal because he does some things he likes. Shameful.
its_baddude wrote:
Great, I see in a long winded way you actually agree with me. You can not dispute anything I say because it is true.
What you missed:
1) 12.4 million was paid to Perkins Cole. Yet you claim HRC had now idea how this money was being used. LOL.
2) I read the GPS testimony. Nothing new. Everything he said was known. He also played with words to insinuate things that are not true and were retracted later.
I claim that when the Clinton campaign hired Perkins Cole, they had no way of knowing it would lead to intel from Russian sources. When Fusion GPS was hired by Perkins Cole, they didn't know it would lead to intel from Russian sources either. If you really did read the Fusion GPS testimony, you would know that my claim is true.
So I dispute your ridiculous claim that HRC colluded with Russians. She had no way of knowing that money for opposition research would eventually be used to gather intel from Russian sources. Even Fusion GPS didn't know that until long after they were hired.
You can't collude with someone if you don't know it is happening. There is absolutely no evidence that HRC knew anything about it.
Compare that with the Trump campaign, who worked directly with Kremlin associates on numerous occasions.
I'll ask the same question I always do when Republicans push this nonsense. If I'm a doctor, and I sincerely believe that Republicans are blasphemous, immoral, and a threat to my country, why should I be forced to provide them with any medical treatment at all? Isn't this, in some sense, condoning their indefensible lifestyle?
There are a lot of libertarian-minded people in the Republican party who would be just fine with that. They would say you should be able to refuse treatment to anyone for any reason. Rand Paul, for instance, has said it should be perfectly legal to refuse service to someone because they are black.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
I'll ask the same question I always do when Republicans push this nonsense. If I'm a doctor, and I sincerely believe that Republicans are blasphemous, immoral, and a threat to my country, why should I be forced to provide them with any medical treatment at all? Isn't this, in some sense, condoning their indefensible lifestyle?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-administration-creating-civil-rights-division-to-shield-health-workers-with-moral-or-religious-objections/2018/01/17/5663d1c0-fbe2-11e7-8f66-2df0b94bb98a_story.html?utm_term=.128f73828a29
Fat hurts wrote:
There are a lot of libertarian-minded people in the Republican party who would be just fine with that. They would say you should be able to refuse treatment to anyone for any reason.
Yes, and what a fine, civil society that would create. Something tells me they'd change their tune pretty quickly if they got into a bad car accident in an area with a bunch of angry, liberal doctors and emergency service workers.
Flagpole wrote:
obvious problem wrote:
In other words "the ends justify the means" which is the only sane argument left for supporting Trump at this point. All the rest is just trolling.
Yep. He's throwing any integrity away (or he never had any to begin with) by supporting a criminal because he does some things he likes. Shameful.
Says the biased racist himself. Do try to sleep well for the next 3 years, I will. Trump is not a racist, but you apparently are.
Shameful INdeeD wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Yep. He's throwing any integrity away (or he never had any to begin with) by supporting a criminal because he does some things he likes. Shameful.
Says the biased racist himself. Do try to sleep well for the next 3 years, I will. Trump is not a racist, but you apparently are.
Shameful INdeeD wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Yep. He's throwing any integrity away (or he never had any to begin with) by supporting a criminal because he does some things he likes. Shameful.
Says the biased racist himself. Do try to sleep well for the next 3 years, I will. Trump is not a racist, but you apparently are.
How can you conclude that Trump is not a racist? I won't even get into you accusing me of being one, because that's ridiculous. Well, saying Trump isn't a racist is ridiculous too...hmm...perhaps I don't care to hear more from you.
Just need a little nudge back to reality, because while Trump is a racist, that is not an actionable thing, and while it goes to his hatefulness, it doesn't really help with the major problem and task at hand, and that is to remove him from office as soon as possible by any legal means possible.
His being racist probably doesn't give him any favors from most in the House and the Senate, especially when the makeup of both will be so different following the 2018 elections, but in a very direct way, it doesn't get him removed.
Here's the nudge...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
The items on this simple test were very easy to find. Trump would have never taken this test unless his people were 100% sure he would get a perfect score.
I am sure a test this easy didn't take much practice even for Trump.
Monty Hall wrote:
The great deal maker nowhere to be found on the hill today. Guess he was right, if you can’t make a deal with a politician you can’t make a deal with anybody. Trump seems to struggle making deals with politicians. Sad.
He got up early and wrecked another deal. A shutdown will cost the country billions in risk premiums.
President Trump undermined his own party’s plan to avert a looming government shutdown on Thursday after tweeting that a key Democratic bargaining chip shouldn’t be attached to the funding package.
Everyone pointing at the President as "the problem."
The magazine in question had Ivanka on the cover, btw. Apparently In Touch will be publishing the full 2011 Stormy Daniels interview by the end of the week. We've still got a lot to learn about President Spanky, unfortunately.
Just imagine if something like this had come out about Obama while he was in office...
Conundrum wrote:
The items on this simple test were very easy to find. Trump would have never taken this test unless his people were 100% sure he would get a perfect score.
I am sure a test this easy didn't take much practice even for Trump.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/take-the-montreal-cognitive-assessment-that-trump-took/news-story/5d7c2975a9f6221f3d61c3e38b6c7d52
OMG that's hilarious!
Seriously folks, this is the test that the Trumpettes were bragging that Trump got a perfect score on.
Can you recognize a picture of a camel? Trump can! A genius, I say. A certified genius!
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
The magazine in question had Ivanka on the cover, btw. Apparently In Touch will be publishing the full 2011 Stormy Daniels interview by the end of the week. We've still got a lot to learn about President Spanky, unfortunately.
This is the kind of coverage fascists love. More evidence of the Dear Leader's ability to subjugate. And in particular, subjugating women.
Funny how all those religious voters seem to not care one bit the guy assaulted women and broke many of their precious commandments.
Flagpole wrote:
Shameful INdeeD wrote:
Says the biased racist himself. Do try to sleep well for the next 3 years, I will. Trump is not a racist, but you apparently are.
How can you conclude that Trump is not a racist? I won't even get into you accusing me of being one, because that's ridiculous. Well, saying Trump isn't a racist is ridiculous too...hmm...perhaps I don't care to hear more from you.
Flagpole - you are biggest racist here. I worry about what you might do.
Peter tupp wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
How can you conclude that Trump is not a racist? I won't even get into you accusing me of being one, because that's ridiculous. Well, saying Trump isn't a racist is ridiculous too...hmm...perhaps I don't care to hear more from you.
Flagpole - you are biggest racist here. I worry about what you might do.
Agree... the only difference between David duke and Flagpole is David Duke is open about hating blacks.
Ok, so your claim is that the HRC campaign paid 12.4 million dollars and had no idea how it was being spent. Hard to believe. Now, how come the payments to Perkins Cole were described as legal fees instead of opposition research. Why where they hiding this information? Do you actually believe this nonsense, or are you trying to defend your libs? You will be very disappointed when everything is made public. It is clear as day.
Fat hurts wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
Great, I see in a long winded way you actually agree with me. You can not dispute anything I say because it is true.
What you missed:
1) 12.4 million was paid to Perkins Cole. Yet you claim HRC had now idea how this money was being used. LOL.
2) I read the GPS testimony. Nothing new. Everything he said was known. He also played with words to insinuate things that are not true and were retracted later.
I claim that when the Clinton campaign hired Perkins Cole, they had no way of knowing it would lead to intel from Russian sources. When Fusion GPS was hired by Perkins Cole, they didn't know it would lead to intel from Russian sources either. If you really did read the Fusion GPS testimony, you would know that my claim is true.
So I dispute your ridiculous claim that HRC colluded with Russians. She had no way of knowing that money for opposition research would eventually be used to gather intel from Russian sources. Even Fusion GPS didn't know that until long after they were hired.
You can't collude with someone if you don't know it is happening. There is absolutely no evidence that HRC knew anything about it.
Compare that with the Trump campaign, who worked directly with Kremlin associates on numerous occasions.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
The magazine in question had Ivanka on the cover, btw. Apparently In Touch will be publishing the full 2011 Stormy Daniels interview by the end of the week. We've still got a lot to learn about President Spanky, unfortunately.
Just imagine if something like this had come out about Obama while he was in office...
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/01/stormy-daniels-once-claimed-she-spanked-donald-trump-with-a-forbes-magazine/
LOL! Mother Jones- you grow out of that kind of nonsense at some point north of 25 yrs old when you realize it's just about libs whining.
You say Trump is not racist but he sure can find some to work for and represent him.
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/18/politics/kfile-carl-higbie-on-the-radio/index.html