OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

True. What do ya think, old man?

You will never see The Kingdom. You blew it. You blew your chance. Now look at you, getting shoved around by blacks on the streets and called names.

Here are the ten states with the highest mental retard rate:
West Virginia - 15.7%
Mississippi - 13.9%
Kentucky - 13.5%
Louisiana - 12.5%
Tennessee - 11.9%
Alabama - 11.2%
Arkansas - 10.4%
North Carolina - 8.9%
Missouri - 8.8%
Georgia - 8.4%

The first part of the statement is rooted in racial animosity and generalizations that have no place in a logical discussion. Making claims about entire groups of people based on race is not only morally wrong but also undermines any attempt at a rational argument.

Even if such statistics existed, listing states without context fails to establish any meaningful connection between geography and intellectual disability rates. Socioeconomic factors, access to healthcare, education, and environmental factors play significant roles in developmental disorders, and cherry-picking numbers without context is misleading.

The phrasing implies that entire states are somehow intellectually inferior, which ignores the diverse populations, economies, and cultural contributions of these regions. Every state has universities, scholars, and professionals contributing to society at high levels.

If you're trying to make a legitimate point about social issues, economic conditions, or education disparities, it's best to rely on verified data and avoid inflammatory rhetoric. Otherwise, it just comes across as ignorance disguised as an argument.

Imagine thinking that executive orders targeting specific lawfirms who have sued Trump or employ people who have prosecuted him is not coruption. No laws were broken, not even made up accusations. But that's not all. Trump demands that they do $100M in pro bono work for HIS approved causes!

Imagine thinking that selling 1 on 1 dinners with Trump at Mara Lago for $5M is not corruption.

Imagine thinking that giving full government access (accounts, American's personal data, etc) to a billionaire without security clearance or even an official government job who bankrolled the campaign is not corruption.

Imagine thinking that firing all department attorney generals who investigate complaints and legality is not corruption.

Imagine thinking that withholding contracted funding from universities and aid organizations to force a crackdown on free speech is not corruption.

Imagine thinking arresting people without stating a crime, bypassing due process and deporting them against judges orders is not corruption.

Imagine thinking that removing journalists who question policy from access to government, threatening licenses and lawsuits while letting in people caught for being paid by Russia to spread propaganda is not corruption.

The only way to imagine thinking this is to understand that they do not think. They repeat what they are told without question.

Two more replies and I’ll have what I need

You can't prove that blacks don't like you because of your alleged white race. They may think you're a twit and/or a liar. In fact, we all think that's the likely reason that blacks shove you around on the streets and call you names. You are going to have face reality on this trauma in your life and realize that you may be the proximate root cause.

The mental retard data is verified. The rest of your post is some weird attempt to qualify or second guess the data because you don't like the facts and reality. You're just going to have to work on that impulse as well.

The Clintons and Obamas also hosted high-dollar fundraising events. As for government access, Hunter Biden and Jared Kushner have similarly been accused of undue influence. Many deportations occur under existing immigration laws and judicial processes, and similar enforcement actions took place under past administrations, including Obama’s. Likewise, funding conditions for universities and foreign aid organizations are standard executive powers, and restricting press access—while controversial—is not unique to Trump, as prior administrations have also engaged in selective press engagement.

This response makes several baseless assumptions and logical missteps. First, it asserts that someone is disliked or mistreated based solely on personal character without any evidence, dismissing the possibility of racial bias outright. This is an example of circular reasoning—assuming the conclusion (that the person is the problem) without considering other factors. Second, the claim that “mental retard data is verified” is dubious at best. No reputable source compiles state-by-state rankings of intellectual disabilities in this manner, and the burden of proof is on the claimant to provide a legitimate source. Third, accusing someone of rejecting "facts and reality" without addressing counterarguments is not a valid debate strategy; it’s an ad hominem attack meant to dismiss rather than engage. In short, this response relies on personal insults, unfounded assertions, and misrepresentation of data rather than substantive argumentation.

From an article in Sydney Morning Herald

You are getting bul$hitted

Trump threatens the cancelation of government contracts to firms that he’s mad at. That’s never happened before.

He’s also deporting people without due process, condemning innocent people to hell on earth.

He's deporting non-citizens.

He's deporting illegal aliens- they broke the law just by being here.

Cry more.

Correct!

So? Who says I care about Sydney. Throw another shrimp on the barbie, mate.

Besides, economic policy is a balancing act, and dismissing tariffs outright without considering their strategic advantages is just as misleading as overstating their benefits.

Do federal employees have the right to express critical opinions of the President and keep their jobs? Or must they all be sycophants? Trump is making it clear that he doesn’t want anyone employed by the government who has said anything critical of him, and hasn’t since renounced those criticisms and sworn loyalty to Trump, as Vance and Rubio have.

Damn right, most of them are criminals too and that's not counting the crime of being here illegally. trump and team have been doing swimmingly with the border. The other side will never admit it but a major reason why trump won the election, probably the number one reason, was the previous administration did virtually nothing at the border. Plenty came in, often unchecked and later to deceive American voters with low crossing numbers they started flying them in. That cray cray fantasy land policy of catch and release from the biden/klaine/harris administration is over. Those flights are over. If you're in this country illegally now and you break the law no more slap on the wrist, you're out of here. Bye.

Liberal federal employees actively worked to hinder Trump’s agenda in his first term. So I completely support firing any who are not loyal to Trump.

Which is it: are you lying or do you really not know the difference?

Someone who reaches the US border and turns themself in to CBP to claim asylum hasn’t violated any laws and is allowed to remain in the US while their case is adjudicated.

Isn't that what they've done to Trump? Weaponized gov.? I believe so. Politics have become dirty. Mostly because Trump vs. the deep state candidates weren't in the same Skull & Bones chapter together at Yale, if you catch my populist drift.

Anyway,

The claim that Trump is the first president to threaten the cancellation of government contracts due to political disagreements is historically inaccurate. Presidents from both parties have exercised discretion over federal contracts, often citing national security, economic concerns, or ethical considerations. Biden issued executive orders affecting federal contractors over vaccine mandates and environmental policies, while Obama barred companies that violated labor laws from receiving federal contracts. Trump’s actions may be controversial, but they are not without precedent in the exercise of executive power.

As for deportations without due process, the U.S. has long had expedited removal procedures, which allow for rapid deportations under specific conditions—this policy existed before Trump and continued under Biden. Due process concerns regarding immigration enforcement are valid but not unique to Trump’s administration. Obama was sometimes called the “Deporter-in-Chief” for his administration’s record-high deportations, many of which occurred through fast-track processes.