"Dude, this is wild. You’ve got Trump, one of the most controversial figures in history, and a massive law firm making some kind of deal—people are calling it extortion, others are calling it strategy. But here’s the thing—what actually happened? Like, did Trump strong-arm these guys? Or did they just see the winds shifting and go, ‘Yeah, let’s make a play that keeps us in good standing with a potential future administration?’ Because, man, corporations and politicians do this all the time. It’s just usually not so out in the open." "But here’s the deeper issue—if this was extortion, why aren’t there indictments? If there’s proof, boom, hit him with the charges. But if it’s just people pissed off because they don’t like the optics, that’s different. The real question is: Where do we draw the line between influence and corruption? Because if we’re calling this extortion, you could argue half of Washington is guilty of the same thing every election cycle. It's like the UFC—everyone's trying to negotiate their way into a title fight, but only some get accused of 'playing dirty.' Wild times, man."
You people look up to Rogan? Seriously?
He asks, Why are there no indictments for Trump extorting law firms? And you post that here as intelligent?
1. Immunity for Presidential Acts. Executive orders are presidential acts..
2. Pam Bondi- No MAGA will be investigated nor indicted for the next 4 years. Much less Trump.
No dude. It's a freaking joke. My lord you people are so literal.
You're a weirdo, dude. Poor baby was bullied in high school. Did ya sit in the corner table in the cafeteria with your two obese friends wearing eyeliner and a hot topic t shirt? Your buddies Trey and Harley, one with super thick glasses. Fuzzy mustaches. Drove your truck to school in 8th grade. Special classes. PE. GED. Part time worker.
Glad you’re above name calling.
Some of the guests here on this thread only speak certain languages. Pardon my French.
The statement does not constitute extortion under 18 U.S. Code § 1951 (The Hobbs Act) unless there is evidence that Trump or his administration coerced Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP into making this agreement through threats, force, or illegal pressure. The agreement, as described, presents Willkie’s commitments in areas such as pro bono work, hiring practices, and representation policies, aligning with political and legal principles rather than suggesting direct coercion.
For extortion to be proven legally, there must be clear evidence that Trump used the power of his office to force Willkie into compliance under duress, rather than the firm voluntarily choosing to align with policies that benefit its business and reputation. If Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP proactively sought this agreement, as the statement suggests, then this is a strategic business and political decision rather than a legally defined shakedown.
Why do dems continue to mold reality to whatever they want it to be?
This is not a court of law. So nobody is saying anything about "extortion (being) proven legally". Well, except you, of course.
And if you think that these types of arrangements are being put in place free of coercion then, well, you don't really think . . . at all.
It’s April. Are prices or Ukraine getting better this week?
I’m positive that there were dishonest promises made to stupid people about these things a little while ago.
I'm positive you are name calling again. If you believe changing 4 years of damage happens in a few months, I wonder who really is the stupid one.
I’m positive I was too kind with “stupid.” When Trump lies to people for 10 years - to include those 2 above - and they still give him their vote, they’re lots of things worse than just dumb.
I'll report you as many times as you feel the need to break the rules. Severe name calling and trolling does nothing for your liberal arguments or this thread.
I'm positive you are name calling again. If you believe changing 4 years of damage happens in a few months, I wonder who really is the stupid one.
I’m positive I was too kind with “stupid.” When Trump lies to people for 10 years - to include those 2 above - and they still give him their vote, they’re lots of things worse than just dumb.
You are free to leave the country you do not believe in. It will be a much nicer country if you do. And a lot less of the "I'm going to call you dumb and names so that makes me look smarter" goofball stuff. Every single one of you dems' arguments is "Trumpers are stupid." "You idiots believe his lies." There's no substance. Keep trying. Formulate an idea. Come on, you can do it little guy.
I know exactly who are you. Not who you claim to be. Fact is, you are as much a fraud as you claim I am. You “name call” break rules, etc. But you think you’re above it because you see yourself as some moderate.
No, I’m holding a mirror to you and you hate that.
I know exactly who are you. Not who you claim to be. Fact is, you are as much a fraud as you claim I am. You “name call” break rules, etc. But you think you’re above it because you see yourself as some moderate.
No, I’m holding a mirror to you and you hate that.
I’m positive I was too kind with “stupid.” When Trump lies to people for 10 years - to include those 2 above - and they still give him their vote, they’re lots of things worse than just dumb.
You are free to leave the country you do not believe in. It will be a much nicer country if you do. And a lot less of the "I'm going to call you dumb and names so that makes me look smarter" goofball stuff. Every single one of you dems' arguments is "Trumpers are stupid." "You idiots believe his lies." There's no substance. Keep trying. Formulate an idea. Come on, you can do it little guy.
It’s kinda funny that you appear to be the “I’m desperate to talk to you, to anyone, PLEASE !!!” version of adolt.
You're a weirdo, dude. Poor baby was bullied in high school. Did ya sit in the corner table in the cafeteria with your two obese friends wearing eyeliner and a hot topic t shirt?
Ask him if he got shoved around by black people on the streets and called names.
