Wrong. And, wishing he could get bleach in the bloodstream? Did you pass third grade?
“A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant [bleach], where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.” - Donald J. Trump (moron)
Wrong. And, wishing he could get bleach in the bloodstream? Did you pass third grade?
“A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant [bleach], where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.” - Donald J. Trump (moron)
He talked about wishing it would be possible to get bleach into the bloodstream, not injecting bleach. Moran
Um...NOOOOOO. He didn't mention "bleach" at all actually (something that Democrats often get wrong). He was talking about disinfectants and how effective they are, and he said, "and is there something we can do like that by injection...almost like a cleaning" and that it "sounds interesting to me", and Dr. Birx had to just sit there with a doomed look on her face, because she knew that perhaps the dumbest person alive was talking.
Here's the story COMPLETE WITH VIDEO of your dumb@ss leader saying it. Dude, you're no match for me when it comes to facts. Consider this your beatdown lesson.
Well it's true that Trump didn't mention bleach, Bill Bryan (head of science and technology at the Department of Homeland Security) who spoke immediately before Trump did talk about disinfectants and said:
We tested bleach. I can tell you that bleach will kill the virus in five minutes.
Ask Stormy. Trump paid her a boatload to glorify her being a whore. Or, that whore Melania posting naked pictures of herself all over the place.
To be correct, Trump paid Daniels to be quiet about her whoreism, not to glorify it. Obviously that backfired in spectacular fashion, but the record should be clear as to what Trump intended to do with the boatload ($$$$ - Benjamin Greens). There was no attempted glorification.
Wrong. And, wishing he could get bleach in the bloodstream? Did you pass third grade?
“A question that probably some of you are thinking of if you’re totally into that world,” Trump began, clearly thinking the question himself, “So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn’t been checked, but you’re going to test it. And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way, and I think you said you’re going to test that, too. It sounds interesting. And then I see the disinfectant [bleach], where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs, and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that.” - Donald J. Trump (moron)
"Fox News agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million and acknowledged the court's earlier ruling that Fox had broadcast false statements about Dominion. ... It is the largest known media settlement for defamation in U.S. history."
Yes, they have been proven to be a lying unethical organization. There is no longer any doubt about that. They can not be trusted, nor do they deserve, to hold a debate of this importance.
"Fox News agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million and acknowledged the court's earlier ruling that Fox had broadcast false statements about Dominion. ... It is the largest known media settlement for defamation in U.S. history."
Yes, they have been proven to be a lying unethical organization. There is no longer any doubt about that. They can not be trusted, nor do they deserve, to hold a debate of this importance.
You can say the same thing about the New York Times. They have lost all their credibility.
"Fox News agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million and acknowledged the court's earlier ruling that Fox had broadcast false statements about Dominion. ... It is the largest known media settlement for defamation in U.S. history."
Yes, they have been proven to be a lying unethical organization. There is no longer any doubt about that. They can not be trusted, nor do they deserve, to hold a debate of this importance.
It looked like Fox was trying to get back to being at least an accurate news source around the time of the Dominion disclosures. They biffcanned Moscow Carlson, and made some significant other internal changes.
That Smartmatic case survived Fox's attempts to dismiss, so we may soon see some discovery materials about why, for example, they kept election-denying hysteric Pirro around. Or they may be paying another $700 million to keep sh!t quiet. We shall see.
Yes, they have been proven to be a lying unethical organization. There is no longer any doubt about that. They can not be trusted, nor do they deserve, to hold a debate of this importance.
You can say the same thing about the New York Times. They have lost all their credibility.
All the MSM is going down the tubes. Way down the tubes.
Dems don’t really care about minorities, their policies are designed to bind them to subsistence payments. Similar to illegal immigrants, bring them in to be voters, tie them to The Party. It is all about political power. Really evil.
I am hearing from sources not yet permitted to speak that black insurrectionist has been located and will soon be releasing a bombshell report not related to the ABC whistleblower.
I was glad to see that Black Insurrectionist is back and apparently safe. And the rumors that he is actually Mark Robinson are just that - rumors. We don't countenance rumors here. We substantiate.
Black Insurrectionist is the only one other than Speaker Mike Johnson (R - La.) with an authenticated copy of the ABC blower's Affidavit. The blower's next of kin are not cooperating with authorities. We do not yet know who is in possession of the blower's secretly record conversations at ABC. This is a developing situation.
At what arbitrary point do you consider them to be babies? You abortion zealots can't seem to agree.
Some of you think the kid needs to be crowning. Others say "viability" and then refuse to be honest about what timeframe that means.
Arbitrary? Probably around 20 weeks, since the earliest term pregnancy to survive with modern medicine is 22 weeks. But let’s play this safe and back up the deadline to 16 weeks. Would you support a federal law that permits abortion for any reason up to 16 weeks, with exceptions beyond that for medical abnormalities?
Cut the crowning crap. No sane person supports abortion on demand so late in a pregnancy. No one gets to 40 weeks and says, “you know what, I’ve changed my mind and would like to be forcibly dilated and have this removed.” Abortions so late only occur if the fetus is so medically compromised that survival isn’t possible and the mother doesn’t want to suffer to continue carrying her DOA pregnancy to term.
I think that something around 16 weeks makes sense.
At what arbitrary point do you consider them to be babies? You abortion zealots can't seem to agree.
Some of you think the kid needs to be crowning. Others say "viability" and then refuse to be honest about what timeframe that means.
Arbitrary? Probably around 20 weeks, since the earliest term pregnancy to survive with modern medicine is 22 weeks. But let’s play this safe and back up the deadline to 16 weeks. Would you support a federal law that permits abortion for any reason up to 16 weeks, with exceptions beyond that for medical abnormalities?
Cut the crowning crap. No sane person supports abortion on demand so late in a pregnancy. No one gets to 40 weeks and says, “you know what, I’ve changed my mind and would like to be forcibly dilated and have this removed.” Abortions so late only occur if the fetus is so medically compromised that survival isn’t possible and the mother doesn’t want to suffer to continue carrying her DOA pregnancy to term.
21 weeks is the earliest. They probably don't even try before that because they claimed the odds at surviving at 21 weeks was 0%. Clearly they were wrong.
If you ran on banning abortion after 16 weeks with exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother you would have the support of 75+% of the American people and the Democrat party would treat you like you were in the Taliban.
You don't seem to understand what your own party's position is. The Democrat party supports abortion at any time for any reason right up until the moment of birth. You not being a monster and realizing that's barbaric does not change the fact that the laws are written to allow for it to be done.
You can abort the baby at any time for any reason in states like Oregon including babies at 40 weeks.
Ask Stormy. Trump paid her a boatload to glorify her being a whore. Or, that whore Melania posting naked pictures of herself all over the place.
If possible, please keep misogyny out of your posts.
I understand that you were responding to mock a misogynist's post. But the use of the w-word is just as offensive as the use of the n-word and should be left entirely out of public discourse.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(734x319:736x321)/richard-hutchinson-1-022c0fd23a1247288020a6762393461e.jpg)