Hello Hillary lovers. Still butt hurt?
Democrats want more sh!thole immigrants!!!!
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!
Hello Hillary lovers. Still butt hurt?
Democrats want more sh!thole immigrants!!!!
Hahahahahahaha!!!!!
paraphrase wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
We don't need the perspective of people who come from cultures which are incompatible with ours. They have nothing to offer us. They need an injection of our culture into theirs to bring them up from third world status. THEY are the one's who need a new perspective.
So true! People from other countries need to learn how to dress like slobs (shorts, sandals and t-shirts everywhere), eat hamburgers and other assorted craps and drink beer until they become overweight slobs, sit on their fat asses all day playing with their smartphones or video game controllers, consume more illegal drugs than the rest of the world combined, and shoot up schools, post offices, casinos, churches, etc. Which country wouldn't benefit from the enlightened perspective Americans have to offer?
This is why you lost!
Can you not see the hypocrisy?
I try to maintain the illusion that I'm conversing with intelligent people, but I'm struggling with that today.
DiscoGary wrote:
There was no legal immigration to the US between 1924 and 1965.
You're a terrible liar.
The legislation excluded the Western Hemisphere from the quota system, and the 1920s ushered in the penultimate era of U.S. immigration history. Immigrants could and did move quite freely from Mexico, the Caribbean (including Jamaica, Barbados, and Haiti), and other parts of Central and South America. This era, which reflected the application of the 1924 legislation, lasted until 1965. During those 40 years, the United States began to admit, case by case, limited numbers of refugees. Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany before World War II, Jewish Holocaust survivors after the war, non-Jewish displaced persons fleeing Communist rule in Central Europe and Russia, Hungarians seeking refuge after their failed uprising in 1956, and Cubans after the 1960 revolution managed to find haven in the United States when their plight moved the collective conscience of America, but the basic immigration law remained in place.
paraphrase wrote:
So true! People from other countries need to learn how to dress like slobs (shorts, sandals and t-shirts everywhere), eat hamburgers and other assorted craps and drink beer until they become overweight slobs, sit on their fat asses all day playing with their smartphones or video game controllers, consume more illegal drugs than the rest of the world combined, and shoot up schools, post offices, casinos, churches, etc. Which country wouldn't benefit from the enlightened perspective Americans have to offer?
Lol...
Democrats lost because of how the system is set up.
Total votes in 2016
President
Democrat - 65,845,063
Republican - 62,980,160
Senate (1/3 of seats up for election)
Democrat - 51,496,682
Republican - 40,402,790
House
Republican - 63,173,815
Democrat - 61,776,554
Democrats won the popular vote in 2 of the 3 segments yet Republicans won control of all 3.
Obviously Californians and New Yorkers need to spread out and move into the Carolinas and Dakotas
L L wrote:
Democrats lost because of how the system is set up.
Total votes in 2016
President
Democrat - 65,845,063
Republican - 62,980,160
Senate (1/3 of seats up for election)
Democrat - 51,496,682
Republican - 40,402,790
House
Republican - 63,173,815
Democrat - 61,776,554
Democrats won the popular vote in 2 of the 3 segments yet Republicans won control of all 3.
Obviously Californians and New Yorkers need to spread out and move into the Carolinas and Dakotas
Never mind.
No we "lost" because of:
1. Three decades of GOP-led character assault against Hillary Clinton that turned up nothing burger after nothing burger;
2. a concerted effort to hack the electoral process by the Russians;
3. Racist Nazis such as yourself whose azzholes burned raw because a (gasp) black man was president;
4. Gerrymandering that leads to an 8% tilt in the GOP favor;
5. A corroded electoral college as Hillary Clinton won by 3 million votes;
6. Unbridled opposition to every one of Obama's policy proposals by the corrupted GOP congress.
This is just to name some.
Rigged for Trump wrote:
No we "lost" because of:
1. Three decades of GOP-led character assault against Hillary Clinton that turned up nothing burger after nothing burger;
2. a concerted effort to hack the electoral process by the Russians;
3. Racist Nazis such as yourself whose azzholes burned raw because a (gasp) black man was president;
4. Gerrymandering that leads to an 8% tilt in the GOP favor;
5. A corroded electoral college as Hillary Clinton won by 3 million votes;
6. Unbridled opposition to every one of Obama's policy proposals by the corrupted GOP congress.
This is just to name some.
That's it. The illusion is shattered.
DiscoGary wrote:
Nope. Completely wrong! The US is a great country because OUR culture respects the rule of law, protects individual's rights, religious freedom, freedom of speech and of the press, and embraces capitalism over socialism. We become greater when people come from other countries and leave their old culture behind and embrace ours.
I agree immigrants must follow our laws. Most people that come from the countries in discussion are good law-abiding people, in fact.
As far as the other parts of of their culture (language, arts, dress, religion, food, etc...) , I see no reason why they should be forced to abandon them. If they want to assimilate, they are free to do so. But, it's none of your business if or when they do so. What you are advocating is fascism.
DiscoGary wrote:
What would you say to me if I took my American culture to Somalia and expected the to embrace it? You'd call me an "ugly American". So there you go. You don't believe in multiculturalism.
Irrelevant to the discussion. We are talking about multiculturalism here, not in Somalia. I wouldn't profess to tell Somalians what to do with their country. I believe in multiculturalism in America.
DiscoGary wrote:
All this outrage over judging other cultures as failures is proven to be rank hypocrisy by all the people who are quick to insult American culture. If our culture is so horrible and racist then any attempt to bring a minority here from another country would be cruel. Why do that to them?
I never insulted American culture. Just the opposite, I said America is great because of it's amalgam of cultures. The reason to continue allowing immigrants from various countries is to further America's greatness.
In his sh1thole comment, Trump said "why."
This implies, in what's left of his mind, that there exists an "us" and a "them," and "them" don't deserve anything.
And this is from a guy who's been a business failure, and would be beyond a failure had he not started out with a large fortune. Reap=Sow.
Flagpole wrote:
Not an offensive statement, stop being such a snowflake wrote:
I think there is something we--and Trump--can learn from his statements. Whether he was referring to Haiti or Africa it does not matter--both places are model examples for the GOPs wet dream in regards to a Healthcare system--a "true free market" with no government regulation. In contrast, the country the president praised--Norway--has a government run, universal system. Perhaps this plays in to the desire for one group (the ones from the "$hithole" countries) to want to come here and the other not? Obviously there are other differences between the "$hithole" countries and Norway.
We could also look into these countries (Norway vs. "$hithole" countries) in regards to their attitudes towards government funding of education, attitudes towards those that are "different" (i.e. gays, foreigners, religious minorities), climate change policies, tax policies, and the role that religion plays in government and legislation.
My main question for Mr. Trump would be why he pursues legislation and policies that would make the USA more like the countries he considers "$hitholes" and less like Norway? Maybe he just wants to make the USA a "$hithole" so people from other "$hithole" countries no longer want to come here? If so, I think everything he is doing and saying makes total sense but he needs to change his slogan from M.A.G.A to M.A.A.S. (make America a "$hithole").
Nice post.
+1
L L wrote:
Democrats lost because of how the system is set up.
Well, then you'd have to apply that to other general elections.
The Democrats were clobbered all the way down ballots. And then you had a really weak candidate with a party that didn't really mind it's base in the prior 4 years. Don't forget that many votes were split by third parties. And then you had a Republican who could emotionally motivate some non-voters.
Trumps Brain Trust wrote:
I really want to know if Trump supporters believe things like today's announcement (tweet) by Trump regarding the London trip and the Embassy where he blames Obama, when it is known that the Embassy decision was made before Obama took office? Do you just blindly accept it, find it acceptable to lie since it is Obama being blamed, think it is total BS and just take it since you agree with his politics, ...?
I think they mostly believe it. We know since the beginning that providing alternate facts was a core strategy.
truthseakr wrote:
Liberals are mad because he used a bad word?....
His point was excellent.....
WHY are we bringing in millions of poor, uneducated Third Worlders who don't speak English and end up on welfare(74%).....
These are people who have shown an inability to create successful society's....
N Europeans are smart, have money, speak English, have very little crime and fit seamlessly into our country...
Isn't all of this common sense?
Do Europeans want to come to our $hithole country though?
I predict the losers of this thread - its_bad_dude, Rigged for Hillary, Disco Gary and the other Trumpers (multiple handles) will be crapping all over this thread on a Friday night + weekend with bogus links from Breitbart, Fox, Zero Hedge, etcetera, and while the rest of us with real lives actually get outside and do something.
FitzyXC wrote:
I'm not sure Isolationist Gary has ever bothered to talk to someone whose first language isn't English. Banning/deporting people from entire countries sounds a bit...fascist, doesn't it? We wouldn't want that, now would we?
There is a reason people value diversity. It is because most of us don't live under a rock and realize that people from other countries/cultures are no less human than we are simply because of where they were born, and bring unique perspectives to the table.
In before Gary says: "SO LET'S GIVE VISAS TO ALL OF ISIS THEN HURRRDURRR." So bloody predictable.
After the last few pages Gary definitely proved that people are comfortable being openly racist - there’s no shame in it anymore. We first went from “these bad people” to “people from shithole countries” - noticed how that casts a much broader net... should we guess what that will morph into next? Perhaps to specifically singling out “lazy black people” or “ragheads”? Why not? It’s just a little step from the current rhetoric, but it’ll still be for M@GA so it’ll be justified. Conservatives have been sleepwalking into Trump racist land with eyes wide open.
Beautiful Day wrote:
In his sh1thole comment, Trump said "why."
This implies, in what's left of his mind, that there exists an "us" and a "them," and "them" don't deserve anything.
And this is from a guy who's been a business failure, and would be beyond a failure had he not started out with a large fortune. Reap=Sow.
He has a long history of "us vs. them" talk, including calling violent racists "fine people" in office and while campaigning making sweeping declarations about violent "Mexicans" and still more sweeping allegations about America's urban cores.
Meanwhile: Trump officials move to allow Medicaid work requirements
A direct attack on his base. Forgotten voters are forgotten.
DiscoGary wrote:
paraphrase wrote:
So true! People from other countries need to learn how to dress like slobs (shorts, sandals and t-shirts everywhere), eat hamburgers and other assorted craps and drink beer until they become overweight slobs, sit on their fat asses all day playing with their smartphones or video game controllers, consume more illegal drugs than the rest of the world combined, and shoot up schools, post offices, casinos, churches, etc. Which country wouldn't benefit from the enlightened perspective Americans have to offer?
This is why you lost!
Can you not see the hypocrisy?
I try to maintain the illusion that I'm conversing with intelligent people, but I'm struggling with that today.
I'd beat you by 6 minutes in a 5K! Hungover.
DiscoGary wrote:
FitzyXC wrote:
I'm not sure Isolationist Gary has ever bothered to talk to someone whose first language isn't English. Banning/deporting people from entire countries sounds a bit...fascist, doesn't it? We wouldn't want that, now would we?
There is a reason people value diversity. It is because most of us don't live under a rock and realize that people from other countries/cultures are no less human than we are simply because of where they were born, and bring unique perspectives to the table.
In before Gary says: "SO LET'S GIVE VISAS TO ALL OF ISIS THEN HURRRDURRR." So bloody predictable.
So you want to import hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people from failed States with high crime, corruption, little regard for the rule of law, low education ... a
We don't need the perspective of people who come from cultures which are incompatible with ours. ve.
I think there are some areas of this country where that type of person would fit in quite well.
How areas that vote for criminals?
How areas where individuals refuse to pay the government and arm themselves and take over government property?
Low education...corruption....yep they would fit in easily.
I just don't see any reason why the U.S. should admit anyone, but the best, from "shithole countries" - aside from a purely emotional objection about 'racism' or what-not, it's entirely rational to keep masses from "shithole countries" coming into our nation.