So, to be clear, T r umps BS is not a victimless crime. Paul Pelosi is a victim. He got his head split with a hammer because some impressionable kook listened to too much RW propaganda.
NO, not to be clear. But LW propaganda is definitely in play here....big surprise, eh? Man you liberals are so dumb I almost feel sorry for you.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
Post 38: You think a junkie with a hammer can get past the security provided to the hundred millionaire, Speaker of the House, Pelosis? Very clever and resourceful junkie
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
Post 143: Cops doing a well being check at 2:30 AM at the Pelosi house is the official story! And you buy it? I guess. You still are clinging to the Covid jab safe and effective story after all
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
Post 143: Cops doing a well being check at 2:30 AM at the Pelosi house is the official story! And you buy it? I guess. You still are clinging to the Covid jab safe and effective story after all
1. I said the guy showed up without a hammer and that the hammer was Pelosi's. Did not say a hammer was never found. One lie for you; none for me.
Yes you did. This was pointed out to you with citations, just above. You are now lying about previously lying. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post 28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.").
Carmine wrote:
2. Yep. We were fed several different stories as to why the cops were there. How is that my lie? Two lies for you; none for me
You weren't "fed" anything except the facts set forth in the California Motion to Detain and in the federal Criminal Complaint against DePope.
The fact that you repeated, via the JAQing off technique, a bunch of clearly unsupported, unsubstantiated and/false facts and conspiracy theories that were conjured up and posted on the internet by like-minded conspiracy idiots makes you a similar liar for posting them. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
Carmine wrote:
3. You completely made that up. Three to zero
Wrong. You're a liar. You repeatedly and rhetorically asked why there were no security and no security videos. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
Those videos played in court are NOW publicly released, and you can watch them on Youtube. See below. They show EXACTLY what was described in the state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
4. There may have been a 3rd person in the house. We don't know. Asking the question is not a lie. 4-0
You are a liar. There was no third person in the house. No third person involved. You can pretend to question that (JAQing off) all you want, you are still a liar. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house. See also state and federal criminal charges.
Carmine wrote:
5. How is asking why the cops won't show us the bodycam footage a lie? Seems a judge had ordered its release now. 5-0.
JAQing off is lying. JAQing off and pretending there is some sinister, criminal reason for not releasing bodycam video (e.g., it doesn't exist, or shows something other than police say it does) is lying. It was explained to you nearly every time you asked the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
Furthermore, bodycam and house surveillance videos are now publicly released and show EXACTLY what was described in state and federal charging documents.
Carmine wrote:
6. Sorry. You smash in a window from the outside, most of the glass goes in, not out. They have tricked you into not having any common sense . 6-0
Wrong. There was glass inside and outside. Glass shatters everywhere when busted with a hammer. Glass shatter was explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more. You are by now WELL AWARE how glass shatters when hit with a hammer, and all efforts by you to pretend otherwise are lies.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if the all the busted glass ended up on the fvcking roof. Here is a video of your fellow conspiracy-minded idiot DePope busting into the Pelosi home via the glass doors with a hammer in precisely the way described in the state and federal charging documents. No one except you and like-minded conspiracy whackos care where the busted glass landed.
We were fed several different stories in the days following the incident. BY the media. You deny this?
Passing on media speculation that there may have been a 3rd person in the house is not lying.
Asking why we were not sooner shown the video is not implying anything and not lying. The fact it was shown after my comments does not make my comments a lie.
Every time I have seen a window broken from the outside all the glass has gone in. The pic we were shown shows lots of glass on the outside (we could not see the inside -- you made that up). The video we were later shown does show him breaking the window from the outside. Not something we had seen at the time of the comments. Pelosi was attacked on 10/28/22. Public first got to see the video on 1/27/23.
You are trying to imply that by releasing the video 3 months later that I lied when I questioned months earlier why we were not being shown the video
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
The top comments on today’s news in the Daily Mail are gold. They provide comfort that normal people overwhelmingly reject the ridiculous narrative we’ve been fed.
David DePape was seen on security camera footage smashing a window and breaking into the Pelosis' San Francisco morning in the early hours of October 28, 2022. Nancy was not home.
1. Never claimed no hammer was found. Yes you did.See page 2-post 25, page 2-post28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.")
2. Never questioned why cops showed up. Yes, you did. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
3. Rhetorically asking why no security or security videos? You asked that repeatedly. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
4. Dunno if there was anyone else in the house. You repeatedly pretended there was a third person in the house. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house.
5. Why won't cops let us see the video? That as been explained to you nearly every time you ask the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
6. Pics clearly show the glass is outside the house. You break into house from the outsid by smashing a window, nearly all the glass goes in. Common sense. Basic physics. Shocking people can be convinced to believe otherwise. Wrong. Been explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more.
Here is post 25: Good point on the security. How could someone access their house? And if he was there to rob, or to do harm, why bring a hammer as your weapon. Story stinks to high heaven.
DePape answered your JAQing offs on the stand at his federal trial. He got into the Pelosi house by busting in the windows on the back door. You can see him bust the windows on the publicly released security video. He wasn't there to rob. He was there to beat up Nancy Pelosi. He brought a hammer to bust in the windows and hit Nancy Pelosi. DePape testified to all that and all your other JAQing offs. All his testimony and confessions of what he did is corroborated by videos, photographs, glass, busted windows, hammers, phone calls, DePape's computers, transcripts of police interviews, DePape's lawyer, the police, the FBI and Paul Pelosi.
So unless ALL those people, including DePape who is going to prison for 20 years, were involved in an undiscovered massive criminal conspiracy to fabricate and manufacture mountains of evidence all for this demented false flag that you believe happened, you are pretty much just making yourself look even more fulked up in the head than everyone on this website already knows you are.
The top comments on today’s news in the Daily Mail are gold. They provide comfort that normal people overwhelmingly reject the ridiculous narrative we’ve been fed.
Hopefully someone will feed us the REAL narrative before DePape goes to prison for what he confessed to doing in federal court! This travesty of justice must be averted by The Truth!
Looks like time for a walk down memory lane to review the worst, most unhinged, most uninformed takes on this story from the first 20 pages. No surprise, but there's a lot of familiar names here.
But let's welcome a newcomer, fitz.
fitz wrote:
Do any of the regular Leftist brain-dead morons in this thread ever come back to it now that we know that the entire original "story" from the media was fake?
Then there's the tag team duo of Jamin...
Jamin wrote:
Does anyone honestly believe this story? It's almost like "They" are getting lazy with the fake news they always generate close to midterm election day.
...immediately echoed by his slightly slower alt, Koko the Gorilla.
Koko the Gorilla wrote:
Didn't buy that it was a politically motivated attack. And I was right
Not to be outdone, Ghost of Disco Gary took the disinformation campaign and ran with it.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
So, Paul Pelosi is a closet gay and they had a lover's spat.
In second place for our resident stopped clock, here's TheAdultInTheRoom.
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Will you admit you're an idiot when this story is memory holed because the attack had absolutely nothing to do with politics?
I'd say it's high time for an admission, beginning with TheAdult himself. An admission of ignorance, or to a secure facility. Take your pick.
But nothing quite beats the premature crowing of Kobbs Hessler.
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual. The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it. The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country. The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
This thread definitely put people on record and illustrated some sad things about society, just not the things KH thought. Pretty much the opposite, actually. The praise for "Internet sleuths" rockets this revealing comment all the way into first place for absolute worst, most humiliating mistake on this whole thread.
Remember, kids: Don't believe a word these people say. They're either paid for this garbage, or they can't even tell the difference between fact and fiction anymore.
With DePape's sentencing comes a great opportunity to highlight the starting lineup of LRC's deluded conspiracy team (see post above). Those posters who prove themselves half-insane tin-foiled nutters every day, did us the favor of gathering together in one thread, and post just about every insane, naive and stupid idea that any whacko person could post.
It's too much work to list all the inconsistent, ever-changing, reality-defying conspiracy theories they have in the 80+ pages (e.g., some of them think the hammer attack on the old man was actually a planned false flag operation to win an election), but anyone interested in what propaganda, frustration and naiveite can do to the human mind should skim through this memorable thread.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
