Looks like time for a walk down memory lane to review the worst, most unhinged, most uninformed takes on this story from the first 20 pages. No surprise, but there's a lot of familiar names here.
But let's welcome a newcomer, fitz.
fitz wrote:
Do any of the regular Leftist brain-dead morons in this thread ever come back to it now that we know that the entire original "story" from the media was fake?
Then there's the tag team duo of Jamin...
Jamin wrote:
Does anyone honestly believe this story? It's almost like "They" are getting lazy with the fake news they always generate close to midterm election day.
...immediately echoed by his slightly slower alt, Koko the Gorilla.
Koko the Gorilla wrote:
Didn't buy that it was a politically motivated attack. And I was right
Not to be outdone, Ghost of Disco Gary took the disinformation campaign and ran with it.
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
So, Paul Pelosi is a closet gay and they had a lover's spat.
In second place for our resident stopped clock, here's TheAdultInTheRoom.
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Will you admit you're an idiot when this story is memory holed because the attack had absolutely nothing to do with politics?
I'd say it's high time for an admission, beginning with TheAdult himself. An admission of ignorance, or to a secure facility. Take your pick.
But nothing quite beats the premature crowing of Kobbs Hessler.
Kobbs Hessler wrote:
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual. The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it. The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country. The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
This thread definitely put people on record and illustrated some sad things about society, just not the things KH thought. Pretty much the opposite, actually. The praise for "Internet sleuths" rockets this revealing comment all the way into first place for absolute worst, most humiliating mistake on this whole thread.
Remember, kids: Don't believe a word these people say. They're either paid for this garbage, or they can't even tell the difference between fact and fiction anymore.
This case is in the news again, so it's a perfect time to highlight the conspiracy-brained posters who received awards for true conspiracy-idiocy (above). They went above and beyond their usual nutjobbery in this thread.
The man accused of breaking into former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home, bludgeoning her husband with a hammer and seeking to kidnap her goes to trial Thursday
Guy’s a nut job with a brain fried by drugs. And, yeah, drug-addled, illegal alien, Berkeley, hippie nudists who live in school buses tend to align with Democrats. No conspiracy. The guy is a number of cards short of a full deck. He is 100% a product of liberal policies that don’t enforce drug laws, provide sanctuary to illegals, and coddle the criminally insane. Same with the rifle toting nut job who was hell bent on assassinating Kavanaugh that you seem fine with.
You'd have to be a complete retard to think the hemp nudist from SF is a right winger
The anti-communist and QAnon rants might not make him a right winger per se, but he'll do until the real QAnon crowd shows up. Ponder a thing or two about horseshoe theory, perhaps.
Guy’s a nut job with a brain fried by drugs. And, yeah, drug-addled, illegal alien, Berkeley, hippie nudists who live in school buses tend to align with Democrats. No conspiracy. The guy is a number of cards short of a full deck. He is 100% a product of liberal policies that don’t enforce drug laws, provide sanctuary to illegals, and coddle the criminally insane. Same with the rifle toting nut job who was hell bent on assassinating Kavanaugh that you seem fine with.
What are you doing? Practicing your acceptance speech? We had the awards ceremony 10 months ago after the police videos were released.
You'd have to be a complete retard to think the hemp nudist from SF is a right winger
The anti-communist and QAnon rants might not make him a right winger per se, but he'll do until the real QAnon crowd shows up. Ponder a thing or two about horseshoe theory, perhaps.
And yeah, the salient feature of the guy is his mental illness. Just like the Bernie supporter who shot Steve Scalise is mentally ill. Those things are terrible no matter who is targeted or whom/what the perp claims to support.
The difference is: Bernie quickly, unequivocally, and forcefully denounced the violence. Not every politician or political candidate takes the same tack on acts of violence on political figures and their families.
Guy’s a nut job with a brain fried by drugs. And, yeah, drug-addled, illegal alien, Berkeley, hippie nudists who live in school buses tend to align with Democrats. No conspiracy. The guy is a number of cards short of a full deck. He is 100% a product of liberal policies that don’t enforce drug laws, provide sanctuary to illegals, and coddle the criminally insane. Same with the rifle toting nut job who was hell bent on assassinating Kavanaugh that you seem fine with.
What are you doing? Practicing your acceptance speech? We had the awards ceremony 10 months ago after the police videos were released.
Ten months for this to go to trial? SBF has already been through trial on the largest fraud scheme in history.
As with everything in this story, it doesn’t add up.
What are you doing? Practicing your acceptance speech? We had the awards ceremony 10 months ago after the police videos were released.
Ten months for this to go to trial? SBF has already been through trial on the largest fraud scheme in history.
As with everything in this story, it doesn’t add up.
You were once crying in another thread that Bankman-Fried would never be arrested. You're all over the place, in your usual hypocrite-style.
Quit the passive-aggressive JAQing-off schtick and list the things about this story that you think "don't add up" and why you think they "don't add up" and what you think "does add up."
Ten months for this to go to trial? SBF has already been through trial on the largest fraud scheme in history.
As with everything in this story, it doesn’t add up.
You were once crying in another thread that Bankman-Fried would never be arrested. You're all over the place, in your usual hypocrite-style.
Quit the passive-aggressive JAQing-off schtick and list the things about this story that you think "don't add up" and why you think they "don't add up" and what you think "does add up."
I never posted on the SBF thread, jackoff.
Why would an assault take 10months to go to trial? The largest fraud scheme in history was caught, a case put together, tried and convicted in under that time.
Why would an assault take 10months to go to trial? The largest fraud scheme in history was caught, a case put together, tried and convicted in under that time.
Ummm because courts are busy. This isn't fictional My Cousin Vinny where the small town courthouse can get you in right away.
You were once crying in another thread that Bankman-Fried would never be arrested. You're all over the place, in your usual hypocrite-style.
Quit the passive-aggressive JAQing-off schtick and list the things about this story that you think "don't add up" and why you think they "don't add up" and what you think "does add up."
I never posted on the SBF thread, jackoff.
Why would an assault take 10months to go to trial? The largest fraud scheme in history was caught, a case put together, tried and convicted in under that time.
Again, quit the passive-aggressive JAQing-off schtick ("Why would an assault take 10months to go to trial?"). Answer your own rhetorical question instead of dancing around it like a weak jagoff. Set forth whatever conspiracy you think delayed DePape's trial - who, how and why. I dares ya! I double dog dares ya!
Yes you did. This was pointed out to you with citations, just above. You are now lying about previously lying. See page 2-post 25, page 2-post 28, page 7-post 138 ("The guy didn't even have a hammer."), page 37-post 731 ("Seems he took a hammer from Pelosi.").
You weren't "fed" anything except the facts set forth in the California Motion to Detain and in the federal Criminal Complaint against DePope.
The fact that you repeated, via the JAQing off technique, a bunch of clearly unsupported, unsubstantiated and/false facts and conspiracy theories that were conjured up and posted on the internet by like-minded conspiracy idiots makes you a similar liar for posting them. See page 8-post 143 ("And you buy it?"), page 37-post 731 ("Why did the cops arrive at the Pelosi household at 2:30AM?"), page 45-post 885 ("Why were the cops at Pelosi's at 2:30 AM for a wellness check?), page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044, and many more. Cops were there because Paul Pelosi called 911. Also because federal security later saw DiPape break into house with a hammer (which he later admitted doing).
Wrong. You're a liar. You repeatedly and rhetorically asked why there were no security and no security videos. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 731, page 41-post 809, page 45-post 885, page 47-post 932, page 48-post 953, page 53-post 1044, and many more. There is security video, and it was played in court. It shows DiPape breaking into home with a hammer, which he also said (confessed) he did.
Those videos played in court are NOW publicly released, and you can watch them on Youtube. See below. They show EXACTLY what was described in the state and federal charging documents.
You are a liar. There was no third person in the house. No third person involved. You can pretend to question that (JAQing off) all you want, you are still a liar. JAQing off is lying. See page 37-post 735, page 38-post 749, page 38-post 751, page 41-post 809, page 47-post 932, page 53-post 1044. There was no third person in the house. See also state and federal criminal charges.
JAQing off is lying. JAQing off and pretending there is some sinister, criminal reason for not releasing bodycam video (e.g., it doesn't exist, or shows something other than police say it does) is lying. It was explained to you nearly every time you asked the stupid, rhetorical question. See, e.g., page 40-post 783, page 61-post 1211. Your question is demented, and being selectively used. Furthermore, the cops and prosecution have shown the body cam video, the DiPape confession video, and the Pelosi house surveillance video publicly in court.
Furthermore, bodycam and house surveillance videos are now publicly released and show EXACTLY what was described in state and federal charging documents.
Wrong. There was glass inside and outside. Glass shatters everywhere when busted with a hammer. Glass shatter was explained to you multiple times. In fact, its been demonstrated in videos to you multiple times. See page 70-post 1385 (videos of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1388 (video of how glass shatters), page 70-post 1395 (including photos showing glass INSIDE Pelosi house and videos of how glass shatters). See also page 54-post 1069. Many more. You are by now WELL AWARE how glass shatters when hit with a hammer, and all efforts by you to pretend otherwise are lies.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter if the all the busted glass ended up on the fvcking roof. Here is a video of your fellow conspiracy-minded idiot DePope busting into the Pelosi home via the glass doors with a hammer in precisely the way described in the state and federal charging documents. No one except you and like-minded conspiracy whackos care where the busted glass landed.
Thanks goober. But that all looks like a bunch of the usual bat-horsehift now.
DePape's lawyers are admitting everything about the break-in and attack, but saying that their client was confused by right wing conspiracies. Poor guy. He's drinking from the same Kool-Aid fountain that a handful of LRC posters use everyday. Poor whacko. According to DePape's lawyer, he believed Nancy Pelosi was part of a plot to "steal votes from Donald Trump" and other "right wing conspiracies."
DePape's lawyer (Jodi Linker): "Members of the jury, many of us do not believe any of that. But the evidence in this trial will show that Mr DePape believes all these things with every ounce of his being."
Opening statements began Thursday in the federal trial of David DePape, accused in the October 2022 hammer attack on Paul Pelosi, with the defense attorney laying out the outlandish conspiracy theories that drove DePape to se...
Thanks goober. But that all looks like a bunch of the usual bat-horsehift now.
DePape's lawyers are admitting everything about the break-in and attack, but saying that their client was confused by right wing conspiracies. Poor guy. He's drinking from the same Kool-Aid fountain that a handful of LRC posters use everyday. Poor whacko. According to DePape's lawyer, he believed Nancy Pelosi was part of a plot to "steal votes from Donald Trump" and other "right wing conspiracies."
DePape's lawyer (Jodi Linker): "Members of the jury, many of us do not believe any of that. But the evidence in this trial will show that Mr DePape believes all these things with every ounce of his being."
Surprise surprise the terrorist is a far right election denying loser.
He was a Berkeley nudist that sold hemp art. Not far right. This was also a clear false flag BS op. The Pelosi home is surrounded by armed security and cameras. Zero chance this dude snuck in, he was allowed in to produce this story which will be spun by R-words like yourself and CNN into a "ultra-mega" attack on "democracy"!!!
A jury convicted the suspect in the federal trial over the violent hammer attack against Paul Pelosi at his and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco home.
Amazing how the Deep State were able to convince their own FBI agent to take the fall and go to prison for 20 years, all for a false flag that they hoped would get Nancy Pelosi some sympathy votes. Holy moly that is commitment. That's up there with suicide bombing in terms of loyalty. DePape, if that even is his real name, is a true solider for the Deep State cause.
Depape testified in his own trial. And said *nothing* to corroborate a single crazy R theory about what happened. And he made clear that he was hunting Nancy to discuss the whacko theories T r ump put in his head.
So, to be clear, T r umps BS is not a victimless crime. Paul Pelosi is a victim. He got his head split with a hammer because some impressionable kook listened to too much RW propaganda.
So, to be clear, T r umps BS is not a victimless crime. Paul Pelosi is a victim. He got his head split with a hammer because some impressionable kook listened to too much RW propaganda.
NO, not to be clear. But LW propaganda is definitely in play here....big surprise, eh? Man you liberals are so dumb I almost feel sorry for you.
