Will Rubio and the Trump admin be giving more detail about what speech is acceptable and what is forbidden for international college students.
For example, can they say this?
Donald Trump is a Adjudicated Rapist, fraudster, serial sexual predator, serial adulterer, pathological liar, Malignant narcissistic sociopath, human trafficker, misogynist, homophobe, antisemite, transphobe, islamaphobe, con man, tax cheat, charity defrauder and xenophobe who was indicted for felonies in 4 jurisdictions. He peeps on teens, pays for sex, grabs p***y, and tried to overthrow our election.
Will Rubio and the Trump admin be giving more detail about what speech is acceptable and what is forbidden for international college students.
For example, can they say this?
Donald Trump is a Adjudicated Rapist, fraudster, serial sexual predator, serial adulterer, pathological liar, Malignant narcissistic sociopath, human trafficker, misogynist, homophobe, antisemite, transphobe, islamaphobe, con man, tax cheat, charity defrauder and xenophobe who was indicted for felonies in 4 jurisdictions. He peeps on teens, pays for sex, grabs p***y, and tried to overthrow our election.
"Israel executes, buries 9 medics in Rafah; Gaza violence bears ‘hallmarks of atrocity crimes’; tons of food waits just over the border; forced displacement is unsafe; Israel releases 30 Palestinian prisoners amid reports of poor health; where to put ethnically cleansed Gazans?;
We have some more helpful insight why Trump loves tariffs more than his firstborn…
“the Vietnamese prime minister reportedly supported expediting a Trump development in a meeting with a Trump Org representative. This just happens to coincide with the Vietnamese government trying to avoid tariffs from the Trump admin.”
Tariffs are the tool Trump will use to take extortion, bribery and outright corruption to levels that have never been seen before.
Muscular, strong. men with tears in their eyes will be praising Trump for his tremendous corruption.
Trump is aware that during the Medieval Warm Period the Vikings were farming in Greenland and called it Greenland because it was green.
The left is blissfully unaware of this because the cult told them the earth only gets warmer.... never cooler...
"Greenland got its name from the Viking explorer Erik the Red. According to the Saga of Erik the Red, Erik was exiled from Iceland for committing manslaughter. During his exile, he sailed westward and discovered a large landmass, which he named "Greenland". The name was likely chosen to attract settlers, as it was a way to make the land sound more inviting and fertile, even though much of Greenland's terrain is actually covered in ice and glaciers.
Erik's decision to name the land "Greenland" might have been a marketing tactic, since he hoped to encourage people to settle there. The name, therefore, was somewhat misleading, but it stuck." - ChatGPT
Wow, so Erik the Red was a lying real estate developer who also happened to be a criminal.
We have some more helpful insight why Trump loves tariffs more than his firstborn…
“the Vietnamese prime minister reportedly supported expediting a Trump development in a meeting with a Trump Org representative. This just happens to coincide with the Vietnamese government trying to avoid tariffs from the Trump admin.”
Tariffs are the tool Trump will use to take extortion, bribery and outright corruption to levels that have never been seen before.
Muscular, strong. men with tears in their eyes will be praising Trump for his tremendous corruption.
We have some more helpful insight why Trump loves tariffs more than his firstborn…
“the Vietnamese prime minister reportedly supported expediting a Trump development in a meeting with a Trump Org representative. This just happens to coincide with the Vietnamese government trying to avoid tariffs from the Trump admin.”
Tariffs are the tool Trump will use to take extortion, bribery and outright corruption to levels that have never been seen before.
Muscular, strong. men with tears in their eyes will be praising Trump for his tremendous corruption.
They’re a bargaining tool.
They’re a tax that’s inefficient. Small government is the way to go.
Do we have any international students who are runners on letsrun?
“According to a Times of India report, “hundreds” of international students in the U.S. have been getting emails from the state department revoking their visas and instructing them to self-deport, not just for protesting, but over social media posts:”
We have some more helpful insight why Trump loves tariffs more than his firstborn…
“the Vietnamese prime minister reportedly supported expediting a Trump development in a meeting with a Trump Org representative. This just happens to coincide with the Vietnamese government trying to avoid tariffs from the Trump admin.”
Tariffs are the tool Trump will use to take extortion, bribery and outright corruption to levels that have never been seen before.
Muscular, strong. men with tears in their eyes will be praising Trump for his tremendous corruption.
During the recent election season, there was much talk of Trump’s plan to lay tariffs on the importation of foreign goods. Pundits, politicians, and journalists to the left of center consistently referred to them as a tax on...
Tariffs are not a direct tax on the American consumer. They are a government-imposed cost to doing business with foreign producers. They are paid directly by the importer of applicable products, typically an American company, and not the foreign producer. At extreme levels (not just the 100% level Trump has mentioned in some cases, but even at lower rates, depending on the product), the importer will simply stop bringing the product in because it will be too expensive. If the foreign company was able and willing to sell the affected product to the importer for, say, $100 and make a reasonable profit, while the domestic distribution system (importer, transportation, warehousing, retailing, etc.), was able to also make a reasonable profit with that core cost of $100, the entire scenario breaks down if the importer must suddenly pay $200. If those foreign products are no longer imported, the American consumer demand will shift to competitive and substitute products made here in America. This demand applied to a lower supply will, in the short term, cause an increase in the price. It is not a tax on the consumer, but it is not pain-free either. Over time, some of this price increase will be tempered because American producers will increase their volumes in response to the higher price (and by extension, new jobs may be created).
President Donald Trump is a proponent of tariffs, insisting that they are paid for by foreign countries. In fact, it is importers — American companies — that pay tariffs.
Even though tariffs are invisible, their effects clearly are not. They might be sold as a tool to strengthen the economy, but tariffs are just taxes that make everyone worse off.
Tariffs are not a direct tax on the American consumer. They are a government-imposed cost to doing business with foreign producers. They are paid directly by the importer of applicable products, typically an American company, and not the foreign producer. At extreme levels (not just the 100% level Trump has mentioned in some cases, but even at lower rates, depending on the product), the importer will simply stop bringing the product in because it will be too expensive. If the foreign company was able and willing to sell the affected product to the importer for, say, $100 and make a reasonable profit, while the domestic distribution system (importer, transportation, warehousing, retailing, etc.), was able to also make a reasonable profit with that core cost of $100, the entire scenario breaks down if the importer must suddenly pay $200. If those foreign products are no longer imported, the American consumer demand will shift to competitive and substitute products made here in America. This demand applied to a lower supply will, in the short term, cause an increase in the price. It is not a tax on the consumer, but it is not pain-free either. Over time, some of this price increase will be tempered because American producers will increase their volumes in response to the higher price (and by extension, new jobs may be created).
Did you read that article? It says that it is not a direct tax on consumers but it is in fact a tax on imported goods and sometimes that is passed on to the consumer. Self-own (if you could read).
Like I said, it is inefficient, government intervention in the market.
For the benefit of our studio audience who missed it, earlier this week Noyankee's unique spin on MAGA humor was to imply that I should be taken down by a liberal with a sniper rifle.
Tariffs are not a direct tax on the American consumer. They are a government-imposed cost to doing business with foreign producers. They are paid directly by the importer of applicable products, typically an American company, and not the foreign producer. At extreme levels (not just the 100% level Trump has mentioned in some cases, but even at lower rates, depending on the product), the importer will simply stop bringing the product in because it will be too expensive. If the foreign company was able and willing to sell the affected product to the importer for, say, $100 and make a reasonable profit, while the domestic distribution system (importer, transportation, warehousing, retailing, etc.), was able to also make a reasonable profit with that core cost of $100, the entire scenario breaks down if the importer must suddenly pay $200. If those foreign products are no longer imported, the American consumer demand will shift to competitive and substitute products made here in America. This demand applied to a lower supply will, in the short term, cause an increase in the price. It is not a tax on the consumer, but it is not pain-free either. Over time, some of this price increase will be tempered because American producers will increase their volumes in response to the higher price (and by extension, new jobs may be created).
Did you read that article? It says that it is not a direct tax on consumers but it is in fact a tax on imported goods and sometimes that is passed on to the consumer. Self-own (if you could read).
Like I said, it is inefficient, government intervention in the market.
Did you read that article? It says that it is not a direct tax on consumers but it is in fact a tax on imported goods and sometimes that is passed on to the consumer. Self-own (if you could read).
Like I said, it is inefficient, government intervention in the market.
Tariffs are not a direct tax on the American consumer. They are a government-imposed cost to doing business with foreign producers. They are paid directly by the importer of applicable products, typically an American company, and not the foreign producer. At extreme levels (not just the 100% level Trump has mentioned in some cases, but even at lower rates, depending on the product), the importer will simply stop bringing the product in because it will be too expensive. If the foreign company was able and willing to sell the affected product to the importer for, say, $100 and make a reasonable profit, while the domestic distribution system (importer, transportation, warehousing, retailing, etc.), was able to also make a reasonable profit with that core cost of $100, the entire scenario breaks down if the importer must suddenly pay $200. If those foreign products are no longer imported, the American consumer demand will shift to competitive and substitute products made here in America. This demand applied to a lower supply will, in the short term, cause an increase in the price. It is not a tax on the consumer, but it is not pain-free either. Over time, some of this price increase will be tempered because American producers will increase their volumes in response to the higher price (and by extension, new jobs may be created).
I don't know about all that stuff, but Trump's tariffs herald a return to brilliant free enterprise capitalism that liberals loathe so much. Biden absolutely destroyed our markets and economy with interventions, and now Trump has unleashed tariffs to return to a time where decent American taxpayers determined the cost of goods through the sweat of their brows and the depth of their pockets. All economists worth their salt have espoused for Trump's tariffs which are key to unlocking market prosperity for all Americans who are bent on rugged individualism and tired of market manipulations by government overlords.
