Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Runningart2004 wrote:

Also we are due a major economic contraction. There’s no way the bull keeps this up until 2020.

Alan

So you are shorting the market Alan? Or not enough balls to back up your guarantee?

foo wrote:

PIO! wrote:

We are NEVER due a major economic contraction. They are randomly spaced events.

Not exactly. Economies run in cycles. What happened last quarter can affect what happens this quarter. If it were completely random, there would be no dependency.

Thanks for the mindless post!

Yeah, there is some correlation between GDP one quarter and GDP the next. The probability of going from $1T to $0.01T or $100T over the span of one quarter is pretty low. You are really on to something there!

Wake me up when you come up with a meaningful way of predicting the time of the next recession based on the time since the last recession.

Until then, try to avoid more mindless posts.

Trump_Advisor wrote:

This interview was awesome

Dems are so condescending that all Soccer Moms hate them. Tapper said there was only 1 Trump supporter watching his show.

Liar

Tapper Dan Rather prodigy

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/950023175907266560

Another articulate brilliant analysis by Trump, evidencing for all to see his level of intelligence.

obvious problem wrote:

Mueller is coming for Hillary Indeed wrote:

It's official, Flagpole is a racist. Such bigotry from someone who boasts just the opposite. Glad you lost and you're a Democrat. I bet you sleep very little at night.

This is the thing find most incredible about the alt-right. The "whoever-smelt-it-dealt-it" argument.

That the person who calls out racism is the racist!

Sure they might be wrong or intolerant but calling out racism isn't racist in itself.

There was a study down about internet searches what what they say about a geographic area. Areas that went heavily for Trump googled racist words significantly more than other areas.

Racist areas went for trump.

Conundrum wrote:

obvious problem wrote:

This is the thing find most incredible about the alt-right. The "whoever-smelt-it-dealt-it" argument.

That the person who calls out racism is the racist!

Sure they might be wrong or intolerant but calling out racism isn't racist in itself.

There was a study down about internet searches what what they say about a geographic area. Areas that went heavily for Trump googled racist words significantly more than other areas.

Racist areas went for trump.

Yeah, sure thing. There was a study....

I saw the same study about Hillary and her racist rants (you ignore those links) and Obama being caught on open mic.

Do you guys realize just how dumb you sound? Calling you hypocritical is a compliment.

Einstein was also a smoker. Checkmate.

its_baddude wrote:

I've heard Obama speak and he sounds like every average man out there. However, if he is so smart, why is he a chain smoker?

Flagpole wrote:

Wow. Dude, have you ever listened to both of them speak? Obama "acted like he was brighter? Have you ever heard that people who worked with Obama didn't think he had a grasp of the job? What a load.

This is not even a contest. Obama is SO much smarter than Trump. That isn't everything for that job, but Trump has nothing good to counterbalance his stupidity.

nontrumper wrote:

Can't Stump the Trump wrote:

Trump wins another 4-D chess match as he baits every one of his critics into calling him a very stable genius.

What alternate universe do you live in? Trump is playing checkers.

Please stop insulting checker players.

PIO! wrote:

foo wrote:

Not exactly. Economies run in cycles. What happened last quarter can affect what happens this quarter. If it were completely random, there would be no dependency.

Thanks for the mindless post!

Yeah, there is some correlation between GDP one quarter and GDP the next. The probability of going from $1T to $0.01T or $100T over the span of one quarter is pretty low. You are really on to something there!

Wake me up when you come up with a meaningful way of predicting the time of the next recession based on the time since the last recession.

Until then, try to avoid more mindless posts.

Correct, there are "business cycles" but the length of these cycles varies randomly. It could be 3 years or it could be 25.

nontrumper wrote:

People get impatient. Doesn't mean that the investigation is not progressing rapidly. Watergate took much longer and was a 'nothing burger' compared to what we're going to see here. Many, many people will end up indicted. GOP, Dems, members of the media. Take. It. To. The. Bank.

Country over party.

Yep. Just because people are more impatient today than ever before doesn't mean there isn't progress with the investigation and that we won't eventually find out what that investigation uncovered.

I want to see ANYONE who gets caught up in illegal behavior no matter who it is.

There is no way Trump is an innocent law-abiding person. He just isn't.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Trump doesn't plan, and he never has.

That's not the same thing as his ability to connect to people emotionally.

Doesn't make him a savant.

Alan, believe me, I would love to just jump on Trump any time, but job gains aren't the main thing. The fact is that right now we have a great economy. We had that with Obama the last several years too but it is continuing. When the unemployment rate is already very low, continuing to get almost 200,000 jobs a month is pretty good. It's like how different a 10 second improvement is from a 13:00 5k time vs. 10 seconds from a 20:00 5k time.

The tax cut was anticipated and has had a lot to do with the improving stock market for the last few months. This happens when you benefit companies. I will benefit greatly, but I don't need to and would rather see working people gain.

Trump has a lot of things wrong with him, and I don't believe he knows how to govern at all, but the rising stock market lately is in part due to the tax bill, and the economy has clearly not tanked as some had predicted (not me). Now, I don't give him a lot of credit for a good economy, just as I didn't give Obama much credit, but it hasn't tanked under his watch.

He is still a fool and a horrible person and a criminal, and that will all be proven.

Hardloper wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Thanks for the mindless post!

Yeah, there is some correlation between GDP one quarter and GDP the next. The probability of going from $1T to $0.01T or $100T over the span of one quarter is pretty low. You are really on to something there!

Wake me up when you come up with a meaningful way of predicting the time of the next recession based on the time since the last recession.

Until then, try to avoid more mindless posts.

Correct, there are "business cycles" but the length of these cycles varies randomly. It could be 3 years or it could be 25.

When was it 3 years?

Genuine question.

PIO! wrote:

foo wrote:

Not exactly. Economies run in cycles. What happened last quarter can affect what happens this quarter. If it were completely random, there would be no dependency.

Thanks for the mindless post!

Yeah, there is some correlation between GDP one quarter and GDP the next. The probability of going from $1T to $0.01T or $100T over the span of one quarter is pretty low. You are really on to something there!

Wake me up when you come up with a meaningful way of predicting the time of the next recession based on the time since the last recession.

Until then, try to avoid more mindless posts.

Thanks for confirming that your initial statement was incorrect.

obvious problem wrote:

When was it 3 years?

Genuine question.

1980-1982

1958-1961

1910-1913

You are kidding right? Einstein died in the 50s. Smoking was used to keep women slim and beautiful in the 60s. Why would a man of such intelligence and believer of science do this?

Fat hurts wrote:

Einstein was also a smoker. Checkmate.

its_baddude wrote:

I've heard Obama speak and he sounds like every average man out there. However, if he is so smart, why is he a chain smoker?

I'm sorry. I have to bring this up again and again and again for those that don't live in reality. Here is my favorite!!!!!!! Top threats the global economy #3 on the list, Donald Trump becoming president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkI2OcdabY0https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/election-night-2016/paul-krugman-the-economic-fallouthttp://fortune.com/2017/03/07/trump-bump-economy/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/noam-chomsky-donald-trump-administration-financial-crash-crisis-mortgage-deregulation-wall-street-a7631386.html

foo wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Thanks for the mindless post!

Yeah, there is some correlation between GDP one quarter and GDP the next. The probability of going from $1T to $0.01T or $100T over the span of one quarter is pretty low. You are really on to something there!

Wake me up when you come up with a meaningful way of predicting the time of the next recession based on the time since the last recession.

Until then, try to avoid more mindless posts.

Thanks for confirming that your initial statement was incorrect.

Thanks for confirming that you are mindless.

You are kidding, right? Roam the halls of any major university physics department, math department, biochemistry department . . . and you will find many truly brilliant men who smoke. You will also find many who are fat (also not such a great thing). Of course, you being a Trumpette, I don't suppose you have ever set foot on a university campus - let alone got to know the faculty. Not that I am calling you stupid or anything.

its_baddude wrote:

You are kidding right? Einstein died in the 50s. Smoking was used to keep women slim and beautiful in the 60s. Why would a man of such intelligence and believer of science do this?

Fat hurts wrote:

Einstein was also a smoker. Checkmate.