LRC Troller moving the goal post wrote:
Nope. Go back and read the mind-numbingly stupid early protestations on this thread. They all said in effect, that this woman skipped the "all uphill" and ran the "all downhill".
NOT TRUE
I get that running up and down a hill is more difficult than running around it. That's not what was argued here though. What was argued was that , (in whining, crying, safe space invaded voice) "but she cut off the most difficult part, and ran the easiest part. Simply not possible.
You are mistaken. Before Walter even entered the thread, it was Runmaster who posted that Ashley missed all the hills at the end and had a downhill run to the finish.
It is halfwits like you who then piped in with "this is impossible". "How can she have a straight downhill run from where she cut the course while everyone else gets their legs trashed by hills. Don't you morans understand the net elevation gain has to be the same? You are all stoopid whilst I is very clever and smug".
It has then been pointed out to you that she can indeed run steadily downhill while other ascend 100m then descend 120m followed by a 70m ascent and an 80m descent etc etc. You are now trying to retroactively claim that it was stated at the start of the thread that Ashley had an overall greater amount of descent from the start of the race than everyone else, which wasn't originally claimed and certainly not argued. The "all downhill" was claimed to be from the point she cut the course.
This is word for word what Runmaster posted explaining this before Walter ever joined the thread:
"the incorrect route that she took continued downhill to the finish. A totally straight shot on a parkway with one 90 degree turn. The correct race course has significant uphill, and several 90 degree turns ( and one 270 degree turn where you run under the parkway) as the course winds thru some neighborhoods"
Note she says that the correct race course has significant uphill and not all uphill, which is what you keep trying to assert as an excuse for your obvious obtuseness and predilection for attacking one of the people who was cheated rather than the person who lied to, and cheated everyone.