One minute........
One minute........
Runcogrun wrote:
Oregon 125
Michigan 126
Colorado 134
NC State 223
Wow.
Fire the idiots wrote:
Running in Cement wrote:I would rather they take the time to make certain BEFORE announcing the winning team. Remember 3-4 years ago when they announced the winner, then announced a different winner, then finally announced the official winner which was the the team they initially announced (Oregon). I doubt anyone wants that scenario to occur again.
We are not handing out popsicle sticks here. The chips have accurate instant results. What you don't have is people that are able to read the data.
Failure are bidding hosts to be able to provide results from the system.
NCAA fails at having host event credible in managing a national event and allowing a poorly managed airing of the event, pure amateurs all the way around.
They should know enough to require certain specifications for site management for results, as well as video quality.
Were off!
If this is official, I can understand why they took the extra time. Why announce winners, and then have to deal with protests over one place? I say, good on em, and shame on all the bitchers for showing how little they know about the official results process.
162430 wrote:
Runcogrun wrote:Oregon 125
Michigan 126
Colorado 134
NC State 223
Wow.
Now you know why it took so long.
So disappointing to not have ANY bonafide results at this point. Rojo/Wejo, all links lead to nonfunctioning stats leader boards or ads, not to pertinent information. Message board coverage is totally inadequate this year. There is no excuse for such poor perforamnce in today's information age. I have seen this site do much better in years gone by. Very disappointing so far.
Utep out well, Zen at front and Ches seems like looking at team members.
Runcogrun wrote:
Oregon 125
Michigan 126
Colorado 134
NC State 223
Oh No! wrote:
162430 wrote:Wow.
Now you know why it took so long.
Flotrack still hasn't announced the results on their feed... unless I missed it. Still unofficial?
People will be trying to take down King Ches but he is the g o a t Still think Maton get's top 10 too I just heard Oregon trained through pac 12 and west reginals so i'm hoping a podium finish for THE MEN OF OREGON TOO GO DUCKS
Syracuse will be tired from having that silly sign in the air.
My heart hurts for Erin Finn :(
Robert Robison wrote:
So disappointing to not have ANY bonafide results at this point. Rojo/Wejo, all links lead to nonfunctioning stats leader boards or ads, not to pertinent information. Message board coverage is totally inadequate this year. There is no excuse for such poor perforamnce in today's information age. I have seen this site do much better in years gone by. Very disappointing so far.
What are you talking about? The results site does not have posted results. People at the meet did not have results. What are we supposed to do, divinely guess them?
*waving
4:50 at mile? thompson fron, ches on front, tiernan just to outside front
I am stunned that there is not even a graphic of Top-4 teams. Pretty mundane announcement of the women's team titles. The starting boxes are not important. Should have broken away from the announcement of the starting boxes to give women's team scores and at least talk to the Mizzou girl. Not good.
wejo wrote:
Robert Robison wrote:So disappointing to not have ANY bonafide results at this point. Rojo/Wejo, all links lead to nonfunctioning stats leader boards or ads, not to pertinent information. Message board coverage is totally inadequate this year. There is no excuse for such poor perforamnce in today's information age. I have seen this site do much better in years gone by. Very disappointing so far.
What are you talking about? The results site does not have posted results. People at the meet did not have results. What are we supposed to do, divinely guess them?
Wejo I'm pretty sure this guy is trolling.
Running in Cement wrote:
If this is official, I can understand why they took the extra time. Why announce winners, and then have to deal with protests over one place? I say, good on em, and shame on all the bitchers for showing how little they know about the official results process.
No its official , you just have desperate coaches playing games on where athletes finished, the chips are accurate, the nonsense of filing protests is just that.The scoring tabulation is instant. The software reads the non scoring athletes out.The hand tabulated coach's count is something of the past.
Oh No! wrote:
162430 wrote:Wow.
Now you know why it took so long.
I knew the whole time. I said it was a virtual tie between Oregon and Michigan like 40 minutes ago.