John Henry Bodine wrote:
Now add...
running back
defensive back
wide receiver
Where is that speedy/quick/elisive white running back? Why do people struggle with the obvious?
I can see you get it.
A white female sprinter from the USA....where?
If you want to point at the fact that US whites don't compete in American sports occupied by blacks, then you made a sensational discovery.
lpd wrote:
Continental 100m record holders:
Africa (90 % Black) - Olusoji Fasuba 9.85 black man
Asia (98 % Asian/Arab)- Samuel Francis 9.99 black man
South America (80 % Latino)- Robson Da Silver 10.00 black man
Oceania (80 white)- Patrick Johnson 9.93 Mulato
Central America (80% Latino)- Silvio Leonard 9.98 black man
Europe (90 % white) - Francis Obikwelu 9.86 black man.
North America (80 white)- Usain Bolt 9.58 black man.
Just the facts,just the truth staring you in the face.
But we just don't deny these facts, do we? I only find ridiculous that some individuals move so easily from the statement "blacks dominate sprints" to "blacks dominate sports". What you subconsciously don't realize is the fact that you emphasize it so much mainly because this case is one of the few ones, where some racial/ethnic group manifestly beats whites in an "important" sport.
With regard to the fact that the world of sport is so overwhelmingly dominated by Europeans - and I explained for x-times, why it is so (and why it must inevitably be so) - people subconsciously deduce that if a certain ethnic group beats whites in some of these sports, it will also surpass them in all remaining ones and that it will take their place as the new global ruler of the sports arena.
I am sorry, but this won't be the case. The groups that surpass whites in certain activities (West Africans, East Africans) are extremely specialized. They dominate events, whose requirements lie at the margin of the human physical/physiological range, which also logically means that the width of their sports potential is quite limited. This especially applies for East Africans, whose body types lie completely out of the range of 95+% Olympic sports.
I have repeated these facts many times, but some people seem to be completely blind and deaf, because their brainwashed minds can't process hard facts.
John Henry Bodine wrote:
Now add...
NCAA
100m...black
200m...black
400m...black
4x1...black
4x4...black
High School
100m...black
200m...black
400m..black
4x1...black
4x4...black
Last white American to win the 100m...1956 Bobby Morrow
Last white American to win the Olympic 200m...1956 Bobby Morrow
And yesterday I asked a question: Where is any US white long jumper in this list?
http://www.iaaf.org/records/toplists/jumps/long-jump/outdoor/men/senior/2013Apparently, it is impossible for a white guy to long jump over 785 cm, isn't it? The evidence from US is just so obvious! It's the most important world's stats that we should use in our predictions.
BTW, don't forget to mention that your national record holder in the 800 m is black as well. Really funny, with regard to the fact that West Africans in the 800 m are similarly talented like white guys in the 200 m. And US whites surpass US blacks by at least 5:1, as for the population size. Now, this is a basis for very impressive stats.
lpd wrote:
Most whites left the sport in doves.Big lie.
In Europe and here in the US IAAF statistics show the overwhelming
participants in running are whites.They just are not very good at it.
Check your NCAA stats,it will show most participation in running
is by whites.It's just that the few blacks that participate dominate.
The US whites are just so degenerated... Even at such a huge participation rate, their 200-million population can't match some tiny European nations in athletic performances.
Hard to tell who was clean in the 100m final!
Anyway the thing really incredible is that Giamaica has four athletes at first, ,third ,fourth and fifth and Blake wasnt there!!!!!
Giamaica has 2.700.000 popuations !!!
Just New York more than 8.000.000! The thing is incredible!
About blacks , whites ,Yellow, red
who s stronger doing these who s stronger doing that the discussion is hopeless and nonsense.
Let s say that in an ideal world would be beautiful watch
competitions where everybody starts totally clean!!!!Nowdays this is impossible!!There are too much difference about antidoping program in different countries.
Giamaica is different from Italy, Italy is different from
Spain, France is different from Kenia etc.
In Spain they want to destroy the 200 bags of frozen blood and plasma of the operation puerto so we ll never know the athletes owners of that blood.WADA has lodged an appeal against blood bags destruction..
They were of footballplayers, tennisplayers, basketplayers, runners etc. but they want hide everything forever. Only Italian cyclist like Ivan Basso or Jan Ulrich and few Others have pay for that , cos their countries have more severe antidoping law.
lpd wrote:
Most whites left the sport in doves.Big lie.
In Europe and here in the US IAAF statistics show the overwhelming
participants in running are whites.They just are not very good at it.
Check your NCAA stats,it will show most participation in running
is by whites.It's just that the few blacks that participate dominate.
Feel free to post links to your drivel.
Board Keeper, thanks for editing my posts. While the troll IPD who implies about the biggest myth of Black Male endowment doesn't get his posts edited. If I didn't know any better I would guess that this site is run by somebody with an agenda.
El Keniano wrote:
Wrong. Whites in Europe provide the largest audience/spectators and participants for track. Usain Bolt makes most of his money from Europeans. All major marathons in world (London to Boston) are lined with white spectators and participants. What are you talking about? East Africans would rather watch soccer and Caribbean people cricket.
Sir, have you spent extensive time in Europe? I have. Especially eastern Europe. Of course Europeans will have the largest amount of spectators in track. They have more time off then any other folk. Not only do they have the largest amount of spectators in track, they have the largest amount of spectators for a 100+ sports. East Africans would rather watch soccer? What do you think Europeans would rather watch? In most Euro countries I've been to it's Soccer #1, then more or less Skiing, Nordic skiing, Cycling, Swimming, Basketball, Team Handball, Water Polo, Volleyball, and in many Track is followed as much as boxing..not much, but they know what's going on with big names. As far as participation, in many eastern European countries, running is a novelty. Funny, in school, we used to get crazed looks if we said we ran. Not very many serious talents end up going to do something like running, its just not done.