Some loon just shot a Congresswoman

deleuze wrote:

"He left behind a trail of bold political statements." Please.

None of these are bold political statements. They are the rantings of a damaged soul. Hopefully whoever posted that crap now realizes that he gets his news from a propaganda page.

They are the political statements of the alleged assassin from his own website.

How's that not "news"?

Because it doesn't fit the agenda of your propaganda liberal media vendors?

"Damaged soul," oh the poor, poor criminal, hurt by the evil oppressive right wing society. Lets give him a light sentence years and then make him a tenured professor, then he can help launch the career of the next Barack Obama.

Your rant doesn't make any sense, brother.

deleuze wrote:

Your rant doesn't make any sense, brother.

That's because facts and truth mean nothing to you, sister. Not "news" worthy.

Anyword on how Tucker Carlson feels about the shooter?

You Love Your Liberal Lies wrote:

Your rant doesn't make any sense, brother.

That's because facts and truth mean nothing to you, sister. Not "news" worthy.

I did not say that the content of his videos was not newsworthy. I said that it was misleading to say that he left behind "a trail of bold political statements."

You are not making any sense.

I will admit that a page or two ago, I jumped to conclusions about his political ideology. That was wrong. It's clear that he doesn't have one.

deleuze wrote:

I did not say that the content of his videos was not newsworthy. I said that it was misleading to say that he left behind "a trail of bold political statements."

You are not making any sense.

I will admit that a page or two ago, I jumped to conclusions about his political ideology. That was wrong. It's clear that he doesn't have one.

Amazing. Those are political statements, and they are left wing ones. Yet, you just "declare" that they aren't. Problem solved for you, eh?

You Love Your Liberal Lies wrote:Amazing. Those are political statements, and they are left wing ones. Yet, you just "declare" that they aren't. Problem solved for you, eh?

Did you see his youtube channel? If it makes sense as any sort of political statement, then I can't help ya.

That same month, Sarah Palin's political action committee posted a map of the US, showing the locations of the 20 Democratic members of Congress, including Giffords, it was targeting for defeat. Each location was marked by an image of a gun crosshairs.

Palin's camp dismissed charges that she was encouraging acts of violence, saying she had spoken out against violence. But Giffords herself was one of many who spoke out against the image, telling MSNBC: "When people do that, they've gotta realize there's consequences to that action."

Since Giffords' shooting, SarahPAC appears to have removed Giffords' name from the list. And Palin herself today posted the following on Facebook: "My sincere condolences are offered to the family of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and the other victims of today's tragic shooting in Arizona. On behalf of Todd and my family, we all pray for the victims and their families, and for peace and justice."

Huffington Post? Now that is an objective source.

I think it is interesting that when it was theorized that he was a right winger, everyone was focusing on that, but now that it appears he was left wing, all of a sudden everyone is saying, "lets not focus on political party, he was just crazy."

How convenient.

Regardless, the entire thing is so sad.

huffington post? wrote:

Huffington Post? Now that is an objective source.

What it printed is true. But any level headed person can see that this guy was not motivated by the talking heads or political princesses. Politics has always used war metaphors.

The guy was a wack-job.

Some more Democrat 'bullseye maps' have been found:

http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m510/vatar1/TargetedRepublicans.png

LOL

How many Republican congress people and judges got shot and killed if you can tell me please mister?

miles a day wrote:I think it is interesting that when it was theorized that he was a right winger, everyone was focusing on that, but now that it appears he was left wing, all of a sudden everyone is saying, "lets not focus on political party, he was just crazy."

How convenient.

It doesn't "appear that he is left wing." One crazy right wing nut job quoted a random tweet from a person that hadn't seen the shooter 4 years on a hard core right wing conspiracy theory website saying he was leftist.

It appears to anyone that has actually seen the videos that the shooter had his own totally insane ideology.

Top Cat wrote:

How many Republican congress people and judges got shot and killed if you can tell me please mister?

Don't know about judges, but 3 Republican Presidents have been assassinated compared to only 1 democrat.

1:52 wrote: go to sleep bitch

Having a difficult day, pumpkin? 1:52, that is not so impressive, given your inability to see anything other than your own opinion.

Evidently, shooting kids is okay with you, as long as your point is made to the media. Thankfully, your opinion puts you in a very tiny minority, which includes the dumb ass shooter.

indestructible wrote:

Top Cat wrote:

How many Republican congress people and judges got shot and killed if you can tell me please mister?

Don't know about judges, but 3 Republican Presidents have been assassinated compared to only 1 democrat.

One of the dumbest arguments I've seen posted on this thread, and I've seen several. Do some research, asshole.

oh sorry, I really didn't mean in the history of the world. I don't think Glenn Beck was bitching about Lincoln 4 hours every day. Just forget it OK. Go back to your ham radio too and get your long range recon meals ready to eat all prepared to do battle.

On Youtube the shooter lists among his favorite books the Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf.

That does not mean that the passion of Obama supporters should be blamed for this shooting.

It is clear from his videos that he is mentally ill, way out there.

Take a look. The name is Jared Lee Loughner.