Lydiard anaerobic phase

Wetcoast wrote:

I see the 'specific' vs. 'know thyself' approaches as the only MAJOR deal maker difference between the two methods of Coe/Martin vs Lydiard.

Characterising Coe/Martin as non-know-thyself or Lydiard as non-specific shows that you have more homework yet. (Oh and IQ100 is not Skuj fyi. Apologise to him or shave me.)

Nobby wrote:

RE: LYDIARD OR DANIELS? 1/10/2008 5:59PM - in reply to wellnow

http://www.letsrun.com/forum/flat_read.php?thread=964958&page=114

Wellnow:

You know who I am. You know my e-mail address. I'm all ears for "constructive suggestions" any time.

On this message board, there are way too many clowns who think they can say whatever they damn please behind false identity and they would turn around and say, "I'm protected!" (remember Dirty Harry?) Well, they are; and I have no time to wasted on them.

Typical. Some more Lydiardism from Mr. Nobby. That´s him that wants to make the rule. If he dsagrees with anonymous posts or false identity why he writes on the Forum and posts ?

This is what those from the Lydiardism they wanted. The wanted to be apart from critics, to be apart from comments and spread the cult with no interfeerence.

My point is this. Only the cowards they run away. Not by the fact that we may post with a nickname. This is the legal procedure that this site have. He can post with a nickname and we don´t need to identify ourselves. But mr. Nobby and few others they would prefer a kind of secret service to identify me and arrest me for the crime i do against Lydiardism.

Let´s make a private rule from Mr. Nobby that we can´t post with a nickname no more. If he doesn´t want t be the subject of anonymous posts he can´t ge out and don´t don´t post. But how he would spread the Lydiardism cult ? If doesn´t want to be the subject of what he considers negative comments – i don´t – we don´t – and if he simply wants what he considers “construtive suggestions” why doesn´t he build up a forum message in the Lydiard Foundation site and delete any attempt to what he considers the negative critics ?

What mr. Nobby suggestes is that he wants to be the site forum aministrator.

By the way. He is wrong in many aspects. The clown artist that is the more artistic and the best icon from the circus art. I guess that mr. Nobby he doesn know what´s to laugh that´s what the clown does– the good clowns they do make us laugh with deep life sincretism. The irony is an exclusive of the human being. The dog cry but only the man among all the animals he laughs. Some people the seem don´t understand. Some people they want to make us like dogs. Life dog that´s what it is.

That´s not just about interval training that he doesn´t understand, that´s about te meaning of things. He is offensve for all te clowns in the world.

Let´s say the true. He hates that we comment on Lydiadism negatively. He doesn´t understand that we respect Lydiard.

He doesn´t understand that the Lydiardism clown that´s him. This is to identify the targe of the critics not as he says. He says “think they can say whatever they damn please behind false identity”. Please, name the nicknames of the clowns, don´t say too many clowns. If you think that i´m one please, say it, don´t do anonymous cmments about concrete posts with concrete nicknames.

This is the Lydiardism rule. he one that isn´t with me is against me.

My god in heaven IQ100, what is it that you are drivelling on about?

You make no sense whatsoever.

Only you know I guess, because I sure as hell have no idea what you are blathering on about.

Mindlessness.

Wellnow=not an identify poster !

Wellnow=says all good about Lydiard

Wellnow=says that Lydiardism they are wrong but actually he advises them to change the anaerobic concept

For Lydiardism this are positive comments. It doesn´t matter that Wellnow isnt a identify post. He is no clown. he posts anonymous but as he says good thats ok.

Now

IQ100=not an identify poster !

IQ100=says all good about Lydiard

IQ100=says that Lydiardism they are wrong but doesn´t advises them to change nothing

For the Lydiardism this are negative comments of clown people.

Let me ask. Is wellnow his real name ?

Wetcoast wrote:

My god in heaven IQ100, what is it that you are drivelling on about?

You make no sense whatsoever.

Only you know I guess, because I sure as hell have no idea what you are blathering on about.

Mindlessness.

Typical.

I understand mr IQ100.

Not the first time that wetcoast has made insulting comments about folks who "unfortunately" don't speak english as well as he.

Fail wrote:

Oh and IQ100 is not Skuj fyi. Apologise to him or shave me.

I'm sharpening my razor....

I just can't stay away, can I?

Maybe instead of making a jab at IQ100's English, he was commenting on the pointless rambling, weird simile, and IQ100 referring to Nobby as a "life dog" who only wanted to bring everyone down and prevent all people from laughing.

It is unfortunate that IQ100 doesn't speak better English, because now, in addition to trying to dissect his fuzzy and perverted sense of logic, we also have to sift through what he wrote vs. what he intended to write. It is unfortunate that he doesn't speak better English, because if he did, it would be easier to debate with him.

Am I a racist now too? Does wanting to understand something I'm reading make me a racist?

You guys are being a bunch of assholes. Note, before you jump on me, that I didn't say you were assholes. But right now, you're behaving that way.

IQ100 wrote:

Wellnow=not an identify poster !

Wellnow=says all good about Lydiard

Wellnow=says that Lydiardism they are wrong but actually he advises them to change the anaerobic concept

For Lydiardism this are positive comments. It doesn´t matter that Wellnow isnt a identify post. He is no clown. he posts anonymous but as he says good thats ok.

Now

IQ100=not an identify poster !

IQ100=says all good about Lydiard

IQ100=says that Lydiardism they are wrong but doesn´t advises them to change nothing

For the Lydiardism this are negative comments of clown people.

Let me ask. Is wellnow his real name ?

Nobby knows who I am. I sent him an e-mail, yeserday, before I saw this post by you. I know who you are, so if you identify yourself to others, I will identify my name.

Is that deal?

I will be visiting this site again 48 hours.

wellnow wrote:

Nobby knows who I am. I sent him an e-mail, yeserday, before I saw this post by you. I know who you are, so if you identify yourself to others, I will identify my name.

Is that deal?

I will be visiting this site again 48 hours.

It doesnt change my comment at all if you say you send an email and you did identify yourself to him.

For me and most of us when you post as wellnow what you do that is an anonymous post.

The fact is that what you are who you are ity doesnt matter for this discussion. teh question is that Mr. Nobby uses a false argument. When he says he doest like anonymous posts thats not true. What he likes thats simply tiose who agree with him about the Lydiardism and what he deslikes are the ones that disagree with Lydiardism.

By the way. Mr. Nobby tried to run away from the discussion with the excuse and the argument he doesnt understand me. But thats not true either.

I think Craig is more intuitive than you. I never said IQ100's English is poor. Although it is and that is okay with me.

What I said could apply to someone who speaks perfect English, but drivels on mindlessly because they are highly confused and motivated to debate running from a perspective that unfortunatley I cannot, for the life of me grasp.

If this is a good example of Lydiardism, I have to fall back to my earlier comment that your examples are uncompelling.Where you see censorship from a Lydiard Grand Master, I see a pragmatic approach to get constructive suggestions for the Lydiard Foundation to make there material up to date (so that it's not full of lies intended to convert the mindless).I don't see Nobby suggesting that anonymous clowns stop making negative comments about Lydiardism and Lydiardists. Just that it's not the best way for him to collect inputs for the Lydiard Foundation.When there is a choice between moderated and unmoderated forums, the serious ones choose the moderated forum, because it's less noisy.Regards,

I don't think "wetcoast" insulted "IQ100"'s English. Putting the "English as a second language" mistakes aside, I asked myself the same question as "wetcoast" -- what is IQ100 rambling on about now? Is there a link to the previous message? Should I make the effort again to read it for comprehension?I've lived in a foreign country for 15 years, so I'm used to making an effort to understand bad English, and know what it is to express myself in bad French, and German. But I'm asking myself, does IQ100's level of English affect his comprehension of what is written? Is that why he interprets "perfect" one way, when a dictionary offers many other applicable meanings? Is that why he sees "cults" in a series of Lydiardism examples, when I see pure marketing, enthusiasm, figures of speech, etc.?

Gaymond wrote:

Not the first time that wetcoast has made insulting comments about folks who "unfortunately" don't speak english as well as he.

HAHAHAHA! Is this guy for real?

Huh? wrote:

HAHAHAHA! Is this guy for real?

Yes very much for real. Do please tell us of your ideas.

lQ100 wrote:

Huh? wrote:

HAHAHAHA! Is this guy for real?

Yes very much for real. Do please tell us of your ideas.

If I had "ideas" like you I would keep them to myself.

Huh? wrote:

lQ100 wrote:

Yes very much for real. Do please tell us of your ideas.

If I had "ideas" like you I would keep them to myself.

You are the one keeping your ideas not here, so they must be "like me." Yes?

Touche. I wondered the same thing -- did "Huh?" just admit his ideas were like yours?

lQ100 wrote:

You are the one keeping your ideas not here, so they must be "like me." Yes?

Chris Kelsall (Wetcoast) wrote:

I don't mind if I get banned, I will take on that risk, with my chin up.

Keith,

It is big of you to apologize openly on your club's website.

It is true that Skuj has played fairly here at CVRR.

But Skuj does not play fair elsewhere and has been banned for it, for life. Additionally, he has moved some very knowledgable people to anger and two to not posting when he is around at Let's Run.

Can you beleive Jack Daniels and Nobby Hashizume!!

He argues others who personally knew Arthur about their experience with the legend...I don't get it...was Skuj a fly on the wall in 1970 when Kiwi Kim Stevenson had a conversation with Arthur?? OR in Rich E's car when he drove Lydiard around on tour or in Arthur's living room when Nobby lived at his house??????

So kill my post if you want, but I think if Darren wants to be as big a man as you Keith, he should go to Let's Run and come on here and humbly apologize AND confirm that he will not act in the fashion he has been - using 100s upon 100s of psuedonyms to pretend faux compliment himself, pretend argue with himself, argue and debate 3 or multiple ways with others in the name of creating chaos at the mention of the name Lydiard.

That would be a great start.

BECAUSE THIS HAS GOT TO STOP.

Again congrats Keith, all the best and anytime you want to discuss Lydiard with me (I will be the western Representative for the Lydiard Foundation soon) contact me anytime.