This has got to be one of the last thought out posts in letsrun history.
Look, Hocker and Koech could a) both be doping b) both not be doping or c) one of them could be doping but not the other.
But if I was a sports book and I'm making betting odds that one ever tests postitive, you'd have the odds for Koech at least 300% higher than Hockers.
1) Hocker has shown himself to be a GREAT talent his entire life.
I believe he won his first national title at age 9. Then in HS he won the Footlocker xc title while barley running. In college, he won the mie and 3k on the same day in like the span of 90 minutes, beating an older and fresh Cooper Teare in the process. That was indoors in 2021. Outdoors, that year, he silenced reigning Olympic champ Matthew Centrowitz and won the US Trials and finish 6th in the Olympics - all after turning 21 that June.
When Koech was 21,he was 9th in the NCAA mile and 6th in the NCAA 800. His pbs were 1:46 and 4:01 for the mile (at altitude)
2) Hocker as a top talent who was born and raised in the US and has presumably been part of the out of testing pool for a long damn time given his stature Koech is from Kenya - which is like #2 in the world in doping - and still trains there at times.
I think it's wrong that someone says Koech is doped to his eyeballs. That's not factualy correct. That post honestly should be deleted. We like it if people say "I think he is.."
But to act like he's only saying it because he's African is absurd.
There have been a number of posts implying all criticism of Koech is racially motivated. I just think that's really weak, lazy argument. As if no one on here doubted Galen Rupp for 10+ years.
But all of this means nothing. The reality is both are eligible to compete. I've heard nothing about either of them. But let's not act like there isn't a MAJOR doping problem for athletes who train in Kenya.
PS. 300% means nothing if the odds are 1% and 3%.