naiachamp wrote:
there is no evidence they decrease severity of illness.
That’s rich coming from a dummy claiming they cause “turbo cancer”.
This post was edited 50 seconds after it was posted.
-
31
-
Another long stretch of silence from the antivaxxers. They are low energy, defeated, can’t even make a few posts before leaving in embarrassment.
48 -
Harambe wrote:
Another long stretch of silence from the antivaxxers. They are low energy, defeated, can’t even make a few posts before leaving in embarrassment.
Not much more to say.
58 days to RFK.
33 -
DanM wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Another long stretch of silence from the antivaxxers. They are low energy, defeated, can’t even make a few posts before leaving in embarrassment.
Not much more to say.
58 days to RFK.
I’m posting daily. Your side can only muster up a few whimpers.
RFK already said he’s not taking on the vaccines. Bug Pharma stays winning. You guys are like neutered puppies.
16 -
2020420 wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Lol
Companies who invent vaccines in record time that save millions should make billions in profit
Why would anyone think otherwise
They DIDN'T save millions. 10 million Americans more wouldn't have died if the vaccines were never issued and you can't honestly say you believe otherwise. COVID is vastly overblown and deaths were over-reported in hospitals to drive a campaign of fear. Am I saying it doesn't exist? No, of course not. It's little worse than the flu, which, by the way another pointless cash cow vaccine that people do not need to be getting every year.
The vaccine HAS caused neurological disorders, myocarditis, sudden cardiac death, and various forms of extremely aggressive cancers.
Might be the dumbest anti-vaxx post I’ve ever read. And that is saying a lot.
43 -
breit leit wrote:
2020420 wrote:
They DIDN'T save millions. 10 million Americans more wouldn't have died if the vaccines were never issued and you can't honestly say you believe otherwise. COVID is vastly overblown and deaths were over-reported in hospitals to drive a campaign of fear. Am I saying it doesn't exist? No, of course not. It's little worse than the flu, which, by the way another pointless cash cow vaccine that people do not need to be getting every year.
The vaccine HAS caused neurological disorders, myocarditis, sudden cardiac death, and various forms of extremely aggressive cancers.
Might be the dumbest anti-vaxx post I’ve ever read. And that is saying a lot.
"It's little worse than the flu".
I have been much sicker with flu. When unvaxxed me was ill with Omicron, it was a 48 hour inconvenience.
57 days to RFK.
14 -
DanM wrote:
breit leit wrote:
Might be the dumbest anti-vaxx post I’ve ever read. And that is saying a lot.
"It's little worse than the flu".
I have been much sicker with flu. When unvaxxed me was ill with Omicron, it was a 48 hour inconvenience.
57 days to RFK.
Cool story.
42 -
DontFeedTheTroll wrote:
Editorial staff wrote:
Pfizer tried to hide the clinical trials data for 75 years, not 85 years.
Read the article. This was the FDA who said that it would take them 75 years to comply due to the amount of data required (over 300,000 pages) and the lack of staffing at the FOIA office. It had nothing to do with Pfizer.
Why would the FDA try to hide Pfizer's data for 75 years? It isn't like people at FDA get money from the pharma companies, right? Right?
23 -
Why would they do that? wrote:
DontFeedTheTroll wrote:
Read the article. This was the FDA who said that it would take them 75 years to comply due to the amount of data required (over 300,000 pages) and the lack of staffing at the FOIA office. It had nothing to do with Pfizer.
Why would the FDA try to hide Pfizer's data for 75 years? It isn't like people at FDA get money from the pharma companies, right? Right?
How come any of us can read the report PDF now it is available? I was able to read through it. Why couldn't FDA have just posted the PDF? They didn't trust Pfizer?
12 -
It isn't like FDA is incompetent or anything, right?
22 -
Why would they do that? wrote:
Why would they do that? wrote:
Why would the FDA try to hide Pfizer's data for 75 years? It isn't like people at FDA get money from the pharma companies, right? Right?
How come any of us can read the report PDF now it is available? I was able to read through it. Why couldn't FDA have just posted the PDF? They didn't trust Pfizer?
You don’t understand what an FOIA request is
16 -
Why would they do that? wrote:
It isn't like FDA is incompetent or anything, right?
Does this somehow make the clinical trials the FDA requires for vaccines less rigorous?
26 -
The next FDA commissioner
Dr. Marty Makary11 -
incoming wrote:
The next FDA commissioner
Dr. Marty MakaryHe’s a huge Covid vaccine advocate and is very cozy with big pharma.
13 -
2600 bro wrote:
Harambe wrote:
He’s a huge Covid vaccine advocate and is very cozy with big pharma.
Surgeon General nomination is a massive pro-vaxxer too.
Undefeated. 💪
I am undefeated too.
Zero-dose unvaccinated after 1442 days availability AND remaining that way regardless of who is in power at the Federal, State and Local level.
12 -
DanM wrote:
2600 bro wrote:
Surgeon General nomination is a massive pro-vaxxer too.
Undefeated. 💪
I am undefeated too.
Zero-dose unvaccinated after 1442 days availability AND remaining that way regardless of who is in power at the Federal, State and Local level.
Wow maybe we should make you head of the FDA
03 -
incoming wrote:
The next FDA commissioner
Dr. Marty MakaryGreat pick. Makary was a great contrarian during the entire pandemic, dared to think “outside the box.” Great video, thank you.
21
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.