"They don't need access to "high-level" drugs. Any drug, obtainable off the internet, will do the job. You lost this argument long ago when it was indicated by antidoping that drugs are present in schools. Recreational drugs have long been in schools - for decades, in fact. It is utterly naive to think that performance-enhancing drugs won't be - and especially amongst incredibly ambitious athletes."
I live in the world of fact. If you have proof that anyone who ran at Arcadia is doping, then provide it. Otherwise, all you are doing is offering an opinion unsupported by reality. You are like watching a bigfoot program where they always say things like "It sounds like it is a bigfoot" or "It could be that bigfoot hides during the day." In your case, it is "This isn't saying everyone is doping, but many of the most successful MAY be." Well, yeah, they MAY be, but that does not mean they are and there is nothing anywhere for you to support that any top HS runner right now is doping. You argument seems to be, high-schoolers use recreational drugs; therefore, top HS runner are using PEDs." I understand this won't stop you, because you have staked out your position and will not move from it no matter what. But the rest of us know better- you just believe what you want. I will wait for proof, though I do not think it will ever come.
And for the rest of us living reality, consider this. Why are top Tour De France riders so good today? (Yes, some would argue doping still occurs, and it likely does but the controls are much stronger now) Even mediocre riders are riding better in some cases than some top riders from 20 years ago. Do you think developments in cycling technology have nothing to do with that fact? That shoe technology has nothing to do runners running better now that 10 years ago. Training is better, as Ineos has shown, but the technology- from shifting mechanisms to hydraulic braking systems, to lightweight shoes, aerobar changes and so on, all play a major role. I bought a new bike 4 years ago and it is already archaic.