You said distance runners are getting significantly faster despite all my anthropogenic RF and EMF irradiated these runners right?
So you need to have considered that supershoes, doped track surfaces, wavelights, and on occasion doping technology could have caused a greater balance of advantage to the runner than the disadvantage or harm or retardation from anthropogenic RF and EMF exposure right? And if there hadn't been a progressive wave of improving shoes, improving track surfaces and improving wavelight technology then distance runners are likely not going to improve with increasing anthropogenic RF and EMF exposure right?
Without objective observations, we can speculate what we want. I have seen evidence for athletic performance from things like shoes, tracks, even pacing and drafting. I am asking the RF-king to make the effort to provide a similar level of evidence.
My response to that is with expert interpretation of objective observations, objective observations are enhanced, streamlined or gain more mileage and currency, which means also that objective observations become more resource-efficient and save time and money in the manner of 'more bang for the buck'!!!
Speculating it is not!!! 'More bang for the buck' it is!!! Interpretation is what it's all about!!!
Besides, the existential and metaphysical (medium) nature of RF and EMF means that objective observations are excessive and long-winded since the entire framework of existence, the METAPHYSICAL MEDIUM IN AND OF ITSELF of sport and exercise performance or the very ABILITY is threatened!!! The 'objective observations' are 100% guaranteed to be negative or harmful if the medium is porous!
Objective observations stem from measurable performance parameters in space-time that makes no inquiry into the ability or susceptibility of measurable-ness of performance parameters in space-time but right now if the very ability or susceptibility is threatened an existential crisis is therefore affirmed and the metaphysical medium distorted which makes all objective observations irrelevant because if the human being or athlete can't even exist or is no more then there is nothing you can objectively measure in him/her at all as well!!!
Do you understand dear rekrunner?!!
I'm bringing you to the deep end of RF and EMF knowledge right now, completely shaking up your comfort zone and worldview to show you that the medium is metaphysical is KING and prefaces and overshadows existence of the human being and his/her measurable sport performance parameters!!! This medium is loosely called ABILITY or LIBIDO (DESIRE) for sport performance and exercise!!! I'm next-level person, dear rekrunner, sorry to say to you!!
Please join with me to usher in a new era of next-level enlightenment on LRC, thank you! Stop doubting my reason and persuasion!
This post was edited 14 minutes after it was posted.
Yes it is, I'm here to bring in and benevolently indoctrinate rekrunner into my superior RF Kingdom. It hasn't been easy because I need to ERASE in him certain long-held superstitions he has about 'scientific theory' and its supposed 'objectivity' and supplant it with the correct system and order of knowledge in space and time which combines of course Christ Jesus in Scripture, and, Christ-inspired electromagnetic field theory and theorists of whom includes Tesla, Heaviside, Faraday, Maxwell, Searle, Morton who were all Protestant Christians hence inspired by Christ all the same.
Of course. Rekrunner has found a new playmate, and he must always have the last word (and defend all cheaters no matter what).
Khamis seems to have a lot of patience too, so round and round we go.
Lol. My last word was my first word: "what about athlete performance?"
This thread is about altitude training. Recall I started by saying altitude training works (for amateurs) because performances improved, and in response, he told me I was wrong about why, although I didn't say why, and he suggested that it wasn't connected to altitude or RBC or O2, but connected to RF/EMF exposure. We've been playing ping-pong since then.
None of this has to do with "cheaters".
Khamis writes a lot about how important RF/EMF is, and how great he is at understanding these fields, and how great I'm not, while I am patiently waiting for any objective evidence that it has had any impact on sport performance the way he speculates it could, to which he responds that objective evidence, even on large scales, is an illusion. Just the same, he assures me it will be proven in the future, while I wait patiently for the space-time where-when it will have actually been proven in the past.
Hahaha you of all trolls refer to the thread title? Have you ever stayed on topic?
RE cheaters: scroll back if you can't remember where you posted what nonsense. Hint: you are the one who brought Salazar into this thread about altitude.
Hahaha you of all trolls refer to the thread title? Have you ever stayed on topic?
RE cheaters: scroll back if you can't remember where you posted what nonsense. Hint: you are the one who brought Salazar into this thread about altitude.
Not quite true.
If I ever go off-topic, it is usually in response to someone else who has already strayed off-topic, and included some comment about me.
In this thread about altitude, it was "Khamis", not me, who brought "Salaazar"(sic) into this thread, referring to a discussion in another thread. Even in that thread, he wrongly accused me of talking about Salazar when I was clearly talking about NOP athletes, and whether a documentary was "subjective" or "objective".
I scrolled back in this thread, and I did not talk once talk about "cheaters". I did respond once or twice to "Armstronglivs", who wanted to talk off-topic about doping being proven better than altitude training, and once (or twice?) to "Khamis is da best" who wanted to talk off-topic about "dopers and sex sinners", in order to attack me with more falsehoods.
Now I'm responding to you, who wants to talk off-topic about "cheaters", in addition to going off-topic to attack me with more falsehoods.
In every instance, it was someone else who went off-topic.
And it was Khamis who responded to me about RF/EMF, when I was talking about altitude training. He argued that altitude works because of less RF/EMF exposure, so I suppose that could all still be considered "on-topic", if that is what altitude training can deliver.
Hahaha you of all trolls refer to the thread title? Have you ever stayed on topic?
RE cheaters: scroll back if you can't remember where you posted what nonsense. Hint: you are the one who brought Salazar into this thread about altitude.
Not quite true.
If I ever go off-topic, it is usually in response to someone else who has already strayed off-topic, and included some comment about me.
In this thread about altitude, it was "Khamis", not me, who brought "Salaazar"(sic) into this thread, referring to a discussion in another thread. Even in that thread, he wrongly accused me of talking about Salazar when I was clearly talking about NOP athletes, and whether a documentary was "subjective" or "objective".
I scrolled back in this thread, and I did not talk once talk about "cheaters". I did respond once or twice to "Armstronglivs", who wanted to talk off-topic about doping being proven better than altitude training, and once (or twice?) to "Khamis is da best" who wanted to talk off-topic about "dopers and sex sinners", in order to attack me with more falsehoods.
Now I'm responding to you, who wants to talk off-topic about "cheaters", in addition to going off-topic to attack me with more falsehoods.
In every instance, it was someone else who went off-topic.
And it was Khamis who responded to me about RF/EMF, when I was talking about altitude training. He argued that altitude works because of less RF/EMF exposure, so I suppose that could all still be considered "on-topic", if that is what altitude training can deliver.
Look look look, what the heck are you rambling about dear rekrunner????
Haven't I already debunked all your 'objective evidence' by telling you that measurements can only be made if the medium permits!!! What's the medium?? It's electromagnetic fields!!!
So what if you can measure performance improvements in speed or endurance (duration) before and after altitude training if the human being (ala electromagnetic field) doesn't even exist to be measured and observed???? Do you see where I'm coming from???
You need a subject or subjective entity like electromagnetic field and/or a human being to objectify and take objective measurements!!!
Take for example how lustful men OBJECTIFY and take objective measurements of a woman's physical body which is only possible if the woman who is a subjective entity and disposed to objectification first exist!!!!
So if I'm already telling you that the subject which is also the medium ala electromagnetic field is already invalid or threatened, then there is nothing you can objectify or be objective about right???
Dear rekrunner, you are not thinking clearly enough! You don't know the ORDER of space-time hence you put the horse before the cart!!!
Look look look, what the heck are you rambling about dear rekrunner????
Haven't I already debunked all your 'objective evidence' by telling you that measurements can only be made if the medium permits!!! What's the medium?? It's electromagnetic fields!!!
So what if you can measure performance improvements in speed or endurance (duration) before and after altitude training if the human being (ala electromagnetic field) doesn't even exist to be measured and observed???? Do you see where I'm coming from???
You need a subject or subjective entity like electromagnetic field and/or a human being to objectify and take objective measurements!!!
Take for example how lustful men OBJECTIFY and take objective measurements of a woman's physical body which is only possible if the woman who is a subjective entity and disposed to objectification first exist!!!!
So if I'm already telling you that the subject which is also the medium ala electromagnetic field is already invalid or threatened, then there is nothing you can objectify or be objective about right???
Dear rekrunner, you are not thinking clearly enough! You don't know the ORDER of space-time hence you put the horse before the cart!!!
What are you rambing about? None of that responds to or disputes anything I said in my post.
Athletic performance is measured objectively all the time. Here is a recent example:
Look look look, what the heck are you rambling about dear rekrunner????
Haven't I already debunked all your 'objective evidence' by telling you that measurements can only be made if the medium permits!!! What's the medium?? It's electromagnetic fields!!!
So what if you can measure performance improvements in speed or endurance (duration) before and after altitude training if the human being (ala electromagnetic field) doesn't even exist to be measured and observed???? Do you see where I'm coming from???
You need a subject or subjective entity like electromagnetic field and/or a human being to objectify and take objective measurements!!!
Take for example how lustful men OBJECTIFY and take objective measurements of a woman's physical body which is only possible if the woman who is a subjective entity and disposed to objectification first exist!!!!
So if I'm already telling you that the subject which is also the medium ala electromagnetic field is already invalid or threatened, then there is nothing you can objectify or be objective about right???
Dear rekrunner, you are not thinking clearly enough! You don't know the ORDER of space-time hence you put the horse before the cart!!!
What are you rambing about? None of that responds to or disputes anything I said in my post.
Athletic performance is measured objectively all the time. Here is a recent example:
LOL, come on man, dear rekrunner, you really think I'm irresponsible, ignorant, pretentious, trolling, lying, dissenting, disingenuous man as a consequence then???
Are you seriously thinking the 2024 Olympic marathon trials results are 'objective'???
Let me teach you right now!!!
A distinction must be made between OBJECTIVE FACTS IN THE PAST TENSE concerning the historical description of events in space and time, and, OBJECTIVE FACTS MADE OR OBSERVED WITHIN SCIENCE ETERNALLY SUBJECTED TO THE THEORY OF FALSIFIABILITY OR DISPROVING IN WAITING FOR THE SOLE ADVANCEMENT OF THE HUMAN STATE OF EXISTENCE!!!!!
I repeat again if that wasn't clear, dear rekrunner!!
Objective facts as pertaining to HISTORY or the PURSUIT AND STUDY OF HISTORY, and, objective facts as pertaining to falsifying-in-waiting science or study and pursuit of science for the advancement of the human state of existence!!!
I do repeat again if that wasn't clear yet again, dear rekrunner!!
Objective facts in history are completely different from objective facts found in science.
The objective facts in the former doesn't change in space-time and stands eternal. Hitler massacred 1 million Jews doesn't change across the years or decades, it will always be Hitler and always be 1 million Jews!!!
The objective facts in science, say anthropogenic RF and EMF harmful effects change for the betterment and improvement like crazy like the winds and currents of the sky and sea respectively in space-time and is constantly upgrading, updating and improving eternally for the sole advancement of the state of mankind's existence!!! The same goes for the objective facts in altitude performance science, the same change of upgrading and updating and even FALSIFYING (ala to say altitude doesn't even benefit performance at the end of the day or one day) needs to occur, HAS BEEN ALREADY OCCURRING, OR WILL DEFINITELY OCCUR in all past, present and future tenses!!!!
Dear rekrunner, you can't beat me in my realm and territory which is inherently above and superior to yours and 'athlete performance', nobody on LRC can because I'm the most DELICATE AND ELEGANT human being in my morality, logical reasoning and deductive ability, understanding, and knowledge, RF and EMF sharpened no less. Your showing me the results list of the US marathon trials doesn't also dispute or disprove any of what I say because these 'facts' aren't derived of science and scientific research per se, they are merely a factual description of history, of what runner ran what time result!!!
Thank you!
This post was edited 4 minutes after it was posted.
rekrunner: dude, he’s trolling you. I enjoy your posts a lot here (and exchanges with Armstrong et. al.)…stop wasting your time on this one!
Dear drinkmorewine, you really ought not to reveal to people your weakness or otherwise for wine here because its alcoholic content is obviously poisoning your logical and deductive ability to decipher and appreciate my posts against rekrunner's ignorant and ill-informed ones!
I suggest you subscribe to and follow all my posts and comments for 99 USD/yr in that case in order to raise your moral threshold to tolerate real knowledge and understanding!
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
