It's only nonsense if she improves by 2 full seconds, as is claimed here. She won't.
I'm absolutely sure she will not improve by 2 full seconds - but this has nothing to do with the fact that your claim, improving from 1:40.91 to 1:38.91 is the same as improving from 1:55.04 to 1:53.03 is complete bulls&%§t.
30 men have come within 4% close to 1:38.91, 118 women have come within 4% close to 1:53.04, despite the fact that the overall level in the men's category for sure is much higher than on the women's side.
1:38.91 for men is a much stronger mark than 1:53.04 for women.
I know you will not agree - because you are never interested in the truth but just in defending your initial claim, regardless how nonsensical it was. And having the last word.
So you want the last word? But your argument with your ridiculous percentages is still cr*p.
The comparison I am making is between two particular runners. A two second improvement for Mu is essentially the same as it would have been for Rudisha, because it would have been a two second improvement on their respective best. He was never going to run sub-1:39 and she will never run 1:53-flat or thereabouts (unless she does as Kratochvilova did). No woman has gotten near the wr in 4 decades. I cannot be wrong unless she runs 1:53. It won't happen.
Jarmila was an interesting athlete.Goes from 53 to 51 seconds in 1978 as a 27 year old,then dips to 49.4 in 1980,then goes on to run sub 48 in 1983.Then theres her 1.53 800.Ive never heard of drug cocktails turning a 53 second female 400 runner into a sub 48,but they seemed to with her ! her gains were monstrous.Unless she didnt start doping till early 1980.
I'm absolutely sure she will not improve by 2 full seconds - but this has nothing to do with the fact that your claim, improving from 1:40.91 to 1:38.91 is the same as improving from 1:55.04 to 1:53.03 is complete bulls&%§t.
30 men have come within 4% close to 1:38.91, 118 women have come within 4% close to 1:53.04, despite the fact that the overall level in the men's category for sure is much higher than on the women's side.
1:38.91 for men is a much stronger mark than 1:53.04 for women.
I know you will not agree - because you are never interested in the truth but just in defending your initial claim, regardless how nonsensical it was. And having the last word.
So you want the last word? But your argument with your ridiculous percentages is still cr*p.
The comparison I am making is between two particular runners. A two second improvement for Mu is essentially the same as it would have been for Rudisha, because it would have been a two second improvement on their respective best. He was never going to run sub-1:39 and she will never run 1:53-flat or thereabouts (unless she does as Kratochvilova did). No woman has gotten near the wr in 4 decades. I cannot be wrong unless she runs 1:53. It won't happen.
No, I don't want to have the last word.
If you just could add what's ridiculous on the numbers I gave?
1:38.91 is a much stronger mark than 1:53.04 - do you disagree to this? And - again - no, for Mu to improve to 1:53.04 is not essentially the same as it would have been for Rudisha to improve to 1:38.91. Mu has run 1:55.04 at age 19, so a further improvement during her career seems to be very likely. Also probably not by 2 seconds, let's wait if she improves and by how much if she does. Rudisha running 1:38.91 was very close to impossible.
"I cannot be wrong unless she runs 1:53. It won't happen." - this says it all: you are plain stupid.
Winning something in the lottery is impossible to you - until the day when you finally win something. If something doesn't actually happen, it is not a proof it's impossible that it happens, dummy.
I know you will not understand the nonsense in your reasoning.
"I cannot be wrong unless she runs 1:53. It won't happen." - this says it all: you are plain stupid.(quote)
There is 'Exhibit A' for a moron. The record by a massive doper has stood for nearly forty years. Mu - who hasn't improved in the last two years - is nowhere in sight of it. Unless she dopes like Kratochvilova - in which she runs a far greater risk of being caught than the E Bloc athlete - she has no chance of taking it. But since you think she has a chance of "winning the lottery" - and what are the odds of that? - then you are effectively conceding she is doping, when you have no clue about what is an undoubtedly doped time and what could be performed clean. It is tiresome arguing with someone whose vanity far exceeds his intellectual powers, as you continue to show.
Mary Moraa did the same thing to Kipyegon last year in the Kenyan 800 final. That was the first jolt of reality toward Moraa's closing prowess. Her form may be awkward but she keeps churning and very fast.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.