klidele wrote:
In my opinion:
Everyone is trying to understand why a top NCAA runner ran sub-par at nationals. There have been several hypothesis without any way to confirm any of them.
One that has not been addressed, or just grazed was her race tactic. In a 1500, with many runners being very similar in ability at that distance, leading almost always results in being spit out the back of the pack. Someone can 'sometimes' get away with it in a heat when the talent disparity is a bit greater, but in a final, unless FAR more talented, the leader rarely wins and usually fades badly in the home stretch.
Whether it was KT & coach thinking she could run 64 and everyone would give up, or it was the only way for her to win, who knows. But leading a talent-balanced 1500 usually ends badly. The woman announcing acted like it was over at 800 and even Dwight Stones, a former high jumper and field event homer, knew enough to say "not yet, leading takes a lot out of a distance runner."
I am not suggesting that she should have sit until 100 to go, but a push from 600 out or crushing the middle after sitting in the pack for awhile seems like they would have been a far better approach. And hindsight reinforces this somewhat.
What I think is as pointless as what anyone else thinks, but her front running race strategy is something to consider for a sub-par race on the big stage.
Excellent post, you must be new here.
If you'll look at the pre race hype you'll note that the race was between a 4:06pr / 64 close favorite strength runner vs 11 (roughly)4:08 / 61 speedy classic milers.
Consensus was that if kt left it til last 100, 200, 400, she'd get out kicked. She had to either lead from the start, or at least be in the lead by 1100 in around 3:03 and close in 65 or better. That would neutralize kicks and force someone to PR to beat her.
Well they ran the race. Kt got to 1100 in 3:03, but closed in 67.5 to fade into 7th place in 4:11.
Pundits are blaming the coach, her psyche, the whole year's training calendar....while I agree with you, the simple answer is she just went out too fast - first 100, first 200, first 600 with big lead on lap2, and paid for it fading down the stretch.