He is nearly 30 years older than her. Ridiculous on both their parts. They are free to do what they want, but they aren't free from criticism. They have NOTHING in common, no shared life experiences...NOTHING.
Immaturity on his part. Daddy issues and/or gold digging on her part. Pathetic.
Well isn’t criticizing called phobia or shaming now?
dating is a bit weird. having casual sex with is perfectly understandable.
And as women are becoming more equal and independent as the age (which is right) men will become more and more attracted to younger women who have yet to seek equality and independence, there is a connection between feminism and the increased over sexualization of teens
Unfortunately most of these hollywood types are a bunch of creeps, massive amounts of money makes people think they can do anything and it is all right.
He is nearly 30 years older than her. Ridiculous on both their parts. They are free to do what they want, but they aren't free from criticism. They have NOTHING in common, no shared life experiences...NOTHING.
Immaturity on his part. Daddy issues and/or gold digging on her part. Pathetic.
Well isn’t criticizing called phobia or shaming now?
I don't care what you call it. I'll call it what it is..."pathetic."
But if a 50-year-old cougar dates a young male stud, then women say, you go girl.
When I was a 20 year old college sophomore, a 36 year old in one of my classes took a shine to me. She told me she was divorced, and that she lived alone in a house overlooking one of the local lakes. (Rich area of town, so I got the impression she’d received a big settlement from her ex-husband.) Within a short time of meeting her, she invited me over to “study.” She was very attractive, but I didn’t go. (Probably more out of fear than anything else, lol.) Looking back (40 years now), I’m sure the main reason she was taking classes was to meet young guys.
Nothing new here. Look at old Hollywood movies, in so many of them the woman is 20 to 30 years younger than the man.
Also reminds me of an Fraiser episode where he meets an older women he had an affair with when he was in his early 20’s and she was in her 40’s. 20+ years later later Fraiser tries to restart the affair again and she tells him don’t be silly, I liked men in their early 20’s then and I like men in their 20’s now.
When I was a 20 year old college sophomore, a 36 year old in one of my classes took a shine to me.......; Within a short time of meeting her, she invited me over to “study.” She was very attractive, but I didn’t go........... I’m sure the main reason she was taking classes was to meet young guys.
Sounds like the main reason you were taking classes was to meet young guys as well!
THE RATIONAL MALE: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09Y672QKPJOIN RED PILL LIONS: https://www.redpilllions.com/Full Video 🔗: https://youtu.be/rdSiSJzYkc0---------...
No one would say anything about Leo dating a younger woman. What's odd is that he is dating a teenager. Most men is his position with a preference for young, hot women would probably find someone around 25 or 30. No one here is suggesting he should date someone who is 48. But 19?
As a woman in my 40s, I personally cannot imagine dating a man, I mean boy, of 19. If I was unmarried and could have anyone I wanted, and have them adore me, I still can't see dating someone under 35. I'd want an adult man who was fit, good abs, good hair, takes care of himself . . . and is a together adult who could relate to my life.
I get that men are more looks and body-focused than women. But I still think Leo must have some kind of mental problem to be dating a 19-year-old at age 48. I don't think it's morally wrong, and I think most relationships have some kind of power imbalance. It's just think it's embarrassing.
I found it equally surprising, though, that Bezos left his wife for a woman of 50. (She was around 50 when they got together, I think.) I guess everyone has their preferences.
No one would say anything about Leo dating a younger woman. What's odd is that he is dating a teenager. Most men is his position with a preference for young, hot women would probably find someone around 25 or 30. No one here is suggesting he should date someone who is 48. But 19?
As a woman in my 40s, I personally cannot imagine dating a man, I mean boy, of 19. If I was unmarried and could have anyone I wanted, and have them adore me, I still can't see dating someone under 35. I'd want an adult man who was fit, good abs, good hair, takes care of himself . . . and is a together adult who could relate to my life.
I get that men are more looks and body-focused than women. But I still think Leo must have some kind of mental problem to be dating a 19-year-old at age 48. I don't think it's morally wrong, and I think most relationships have some kind of power imbalance. It's just think it's embarrassing.
I found it equally surprising, though, that Bezos left his wife for a woman of 50. (She was around 50 when they got together, I think.) I guess everyone has their preferences.
As a woman in your 40s you are not desirable. Sorry to break it to you. And since your are on here, old woman runners are irritating. You ladies always have nasty feet. Most men would rather take an 18 yr old Latina with a chunky body who barely speaks English over an angry 40 yr old with a man body and trying to be a power hungry nagging “career woman”. Old women are nasty.
If the 48 year old woman is someone I'm already married to and has stuck with me through thick and thin, of course I'm picking her. Every single time.
But if I'm 48, single, and capable of dating 19 year old women: what makes it any more likely that a 48 year old woman will give me "real love and companionship and faithfulness" than a 19 year old? Why is a relationship with a 48 year old woman *to whom I am not already married* inherently less transactional? If I'm not hot/charming/interesting as a 48 year old man, and my selling point is just that I'm rich, then that's still my same selling point to the either the 19 year old or the 48 year old.
I'm more trad than anyone here. The ideal relationship is to get married young to your first, to save your sexuality for that person alone, and to explore that sexuality mutually for exciting decades ahead. Most long-married guys here, if they're being honest, can attest to the existence of wife goggles: to some extent, you see your wife today as you saw her when you first began dating. It's very cool. The 48 year old you love still looks 22!
This approach works. The other approach is: sexual liberation, what matters is autonomy maximization and preference seeking, you're a chud if you're clinging to the antiquated notions of blahblahblah. THAT approach is not optimal, but if you're gonna go with it....go with it. One can't cheer on sexual liberation and drawn-out serial monogamy & soft rotational polygamy on the one hand and then, on the other, start berating someone for continuing to maximize his own autonomy just because options haven't dwindled. Pick a lane. The problem with sex-positive pop feminism (and that's all that exists anymore lol) is that it has no lane.
Great post. I def have wife goggles. While she's only 40, I'm pretty sure I had a mental 3some with 75 year old and 15 year old version of her. Everyone else is a steep downgrade.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.