OFFICIAL LRC President Donald Trump SECOND TERM Thread

BillionairesForHire wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Trump isn't allowed guidance from his hired cabinet but liberals should be free to burn Teslas. Makes sense.

Someone who is claimed to not like hearing difference in opinions is Authoritarian. Haha. What a clown show.

I don't like hearing Harris' opinions. I guess that makes me Hitler. Haha.

Goofballs.

Not one liberal here has said that people should be allowed to burn teslas. In fact several lib posters just a few pages back said if crimes were committed, lock 'em up after proving it in court.

Surrounding one's self with yes men isn't necessarily authoritarian. But:

trying to silence news sources & free speech (remove gov access, call them illegal, call them liars, threaten legal action, threaten licences, etc.)

attacking private companies such as law firms for personal vendetta using government authority,

firing oversight officials (attorney generals),

Removing public data from government web sites,

withholding previously promised funding from universities, gov depts, aid groups for having different opinions,

deporting or arresting people without due process of the law,

personally attacking judges,

attacking the entire judicial branch for upholding the law,

Stating the Constitution should be terminated,

and allowing unfettered government access to an unelected, non clearanced billionare because he bankrolled the campaign

DO qualify as authoritarian.

Queue up the "but liberals are worse" response without any response to points above, followed by childish insults....

BillionairesForHire wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Trump isn't allowed guidance from his hired cabinet but liberals should be free to burn Teslas. Makes sense.

Someone who is claimed to not like hearing difference in opinions is Authoritarian. Haha. What a clown show.

I don't like hearing Harris' opinions. I guess that makes me Hitler. Haha.

Goofballs.

Not one liberal here has said that people should be allowed to burn teslas. In fact several lib posters just a few pages back said if crimes were committed, lock 'em up after proving it in court.

Surrounding one's self with yes men isn't necessarily authoritarian. But:

trying to silence news sources & free speech (remove gov access, call them illegal, call them liars, threaten legal action, threaten licences, etc.)

attacking private companies such as law firms for personal vendetta using government authority,

firing oversight officials (attorney generals),

Removing public data from government web sites,

withholding previously promised funding from universities, gov depts, aid groups for having different opinions,

deporting or arresting people without due process of the law,

personally attacking judges,

attacking the entire judicial branch for upholding the law,

Stating the Constitution should be terminated,

and allowing unfettered government access to an unelected, non clearanced billionare because he bankrolled the campaign

DO qualify as authoritarian.

Queue up the "but liberals are worse" response without any response to points above, followed by childish insults....

BillionairesForHire wrote:

gnarlysheen wrote:

Trump isn't allowed guidance from his hired cabinet but liberals should be free to burn Teslas. Makes sense.

Someone who is claimed to not like hearing difference in opinions is Authoritarian. Haha. What a clown show.

I don't like hearing Harris' opinions. I guess that makes me Hitler. Haha.

Goofballs.

Not one liberal here has said that people should be allowed to burn teslas. In fact several lib posters just a few pages back said if crimes were committed, lock 'em up after proving it in court.

Surrounding one's self with yes men isn't necessarily authoritarian. But:

trying to silence news sources & free speech (remove gov access, call them illegal, call them liars, threaten legal action, threaten licences, etc.)

attacking private companies such as law firms for personal vendetta using government authority,

firing oversight officials (attorney generals),

Removing public data from government web sites,

withholding previously promised funding from universities, gov depts, aid groups for having different opinions,

deporting or arresting people without due process of the law,

personally attacking judges,

attacking the entire judicial branch for upholding the law,

Stating the Constitution should be terminated,

and allowing unfettered government access to an unelected, non clearanced billionare because he bankrolled the campaign

DO qualify as authoritarian.

Queue up the "but liberals are worse" response without any response to points above, followed by childish insults....

agip wrote:

Oldrunningguy wrote:

It seems like only weeks ago that everyone (myself included) said “Don’t pay attention to his Greenland, Canada, Panama take over talk. It was just a distraction.

Well here we are:

“We need Greenland for international safety and security. We need it. We have to have it. And it's an island that from a defensive posture and even offensive posture is something we need, especially with the world the way it is. And we're going to have to have it. And so I hate to put it that way, but we're going to have to have it. A modern day weapons. When you look at ships going up there shore by the hundreds, it's a busy place. And it's really something we have to have. Do you think the people of Greenland are eager to become American citizens? I don't know. I don't think they're uneager. But I think that we have to do it and we have to convince them. And we have to have that land because it's not possible to properly defend a large section of this earth, not just the United States without it. So we have to have it. And I think we will have it.”

we already figured out Kaptain Krime's strategy. Send Vance to Greenland, put him in a place with lots of open sight lines in a big hostile crowd. Hope he gets shot. Use that as a casus belli to invade and take over.