This thread was deleted by a volunteer moderator. I certainly don't want a thread this big deleted so I've restored. THat being said, this thread has served it's purpose. I've closed it to new posts.
We have a new 2024 vaccine thread here. New people don't need to try to wade through 20,000 posts to figure out what is going on.
One of the videos I posted with Geert Vanden Bossche is probably too technical (see link below). However, at 1:08:10 (closer to the end), there is a summarization thst is easier to understand:
I believe there are ways to lessen and even reverse some of the mRNA immune system damage that is occuring.
Ah yes. Vanden Bossche the guy who predicted that the vaccines would create super strains of COVID that killed millions.
Highly accurate and credible prediction 2 years later!
I for one, decided to re-evaluate his credibility — have you?
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
Ah yes. Vanden Bossche the guy who predicted that the vaccines would create super strains of COVID that killed millions.
Highly accurate and credible prediction 2 years later!
I for one, decided to re-evaluate his credibility — have you?
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
Speaking of which here is an important video review by an independent researcher showing some of the major statistical tricks that are being played with recent pro-mRNA drug pubications:
Flawed studies desperately attempting to prop up the ‘official’ covid narrative are getting worse. Here I briefly review 3 recent published studies which should never have passed review. Two were in @TheLancet 🤡🌎 pic.twitter.com/CHZ8ufwdPy
Ah yes. Vanden Bossche the guy who predicted that the vaccines would create super strains of COVID that killed millions.
Highly accurate and credible prediction 2 years later!
I for one, decided to re-evaluate his credibility — have you?
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
So he's 0/1 so far. Noted. We'll see about these terrible consequences.
Did he give a time frame? 100 years? 200 years? Wanna know when to check back.
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
Speaking of which here is an important video review by an independent researcher showing some of the major statistical tricks that are being played with recent pro-mRNA drug pubications:
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
So he's 0/1 so far. Noted. We'll see about these terrible consequences.
Did he give a time frame? 100 years? 200 years? Wanna know when to check back.
He still predicts that the people jabbed with the mRNA drugs (especially multiple jabs) have their immune system altered (as discussed in detail in the video) and will have terrible consequences over time. Some things take time and don't happen instantly. I included his videos and the other videos as they are whistleblowers who worked for the pharma drug cartel. I do think I should keep posting videos of independent experts and whistleblowers because of the positive feedback. But maybe I should also have a web page to link to for easy access.
So he's 0/1 so far. Noted. We'll see about these terrible consequences.
Did he give a time frame? 100 years? 200 years? Wanna know when to check back.
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
So he's 0/1 so far. Noted. We'll see about these terrible consequences.
Did he give a time frame? 100 years? 200 years? Wanna know when to check back.
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
So basic his hypotheticals will not be measurable through observational data? Convenient… is that really what you’re saying?
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
So basic his hypotheticals will not be measurable through observational data? Convenient… is that really what you’re saying?
So he's 0/1 so far. Noted. We'll see about these terrible consequences.
Did he give a time frame? 100 years? 200 years? Wanna know when to check back.
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
Interesting – I personally am partial to predictions beyond a null effect, but hey, what do I know.
There were very few excess deaths in the 25-45 age group in the US, giving very minimal pull-forward effects. I wonder when Bossche thinks this toxicity will appear in this age group?
It certainly seems like his theory presents some testable hypotheses, yet he is hesitant to assert them. One can only speculate why.
I certainly am ready to hear claims and evidence involving "lots of healthy people will start dropping dead any time now" but I do ask for a little more clarity on the 'now.'
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
Interesting – I personally am partial to predictions beyond a null effect, but hey, what do I know.
There were very few excess deaths in the 25-45 age group in the US, giving very minimal pull-forward effects. I wonder when Bossche thinks this toxicity will appear in this age group?
It certainly seems like his theory presents some testable hypotheses, yet he is hesitant to assert them. One can only speculate why.
I certainly am ready to hear claims and evidence involving "lots of healthy people will start dropping dead any time now" but I do ask for a little more clarity on the 'now.'
But thanks to “treatments” that only podcast and YouTube doctors can provide ($1500/visit) and vaccine hesitance (thanks to YouTube math geniuses) - any hypothesis will actually be untestable it seems.
So these heroic iconoclasts will never experience vindication… they are doing it all out pure selfless goodwill (and supplement royalties)
He thinks the effects from the change to the immune system for those with multiple mRNA jabs will *begin* to happen within weeks or months. I think he is correct on the effects, but wrong on the timeline for the following reasons:
1. Geert Vander Bossche is over-estimating the uptake of these toxic mRNA jabs. As Dr. Fenton showed in the video I posted today (above), the actual update is often far lower than government states. This will reduce the expected effects for many people.
2. I believe he is under-estimating the ability of people to abuse their bodies with toxic drugs and a messed up immune system and still hang on to life.
3. People who don't understand excess deaths will see a near zero excess death figure and think that is a good thing because they don't take into account the pull forward effect as I discuss in an earlier post.
4. There are ways to reverse the damage to the immune system that I believe he is not aware of. Some will take advantage of these techniques.
Interesting – I personally am partial to predictions beyond a null effect, but hey, what do I know.
There were very few excess deaths in the 25-45 age group in the US, giving very minimal pull-forward effects. I wonder when Bossche thinks this toxicity will appear in this age group?
It certainly seems like his theory presents some testable hypotheses, yet he is hesitant to assert them. One can only speculate why.
I certainly am ready to hear claims and evidence involving "lots of healthy people will start dropping dead any time now" but I do ask for a little more clarity on the 'now.'
Lol
You should have gone with a meme. It is quite apparent that this isn’t your wheelhouse.
Interesting – I personally am partial to predictions beyond a null effect, but hey, what do I know.
There were very few excess deaths in the 25-45 age group in the US, giving very minimal pull-forward effects. I wonder when Bossche thinks this toxicity will appear in this age group?
It certainly seems like his theory presents some testable hypotheses, yet he is hesitant to assert them. One can only speculate why.
I certainly am ready to hear claims and evidence involving "lots of healthy people will start dropping dead any time now" but I do ask for a little more clarity on the 'now.'
Lol
You should have gone with a meme. It is quite apparent that this isn’t your wheelhouse.
True, I am not familiar with the statistical techniques antivaxxers use to claim mass death is happening but (logically) there is no data to prove it. Must require some serious skills!
You should have gone with a meme. It is quite apparent that this isn’t your wheelhouse.
True, I am not familiar with the statistical techniques antivaxxers use to claim mass death is happening but (logically) there is no data to prove it. Must require some serious skills!
It's immeasurable but just trust me bro... buy my supplement... watch my video... I promise 😡
You should have gone with a meme. It is quite apparent that this isn’t your wheelhouse.
True, I am not familiar with the statistical techniques antivaxxers use to claim mass death is happening but (logically) there is no data to prove it. Must require some serious skills!
The ole “Ahhhhhhhh!!! It doesn’t confirm my bias!! Ahhhhhhhh!!!”
True, I am not familiar with the statistical techniques antivaxxers use to claim mass death is happening but (logically) there is no data to prove it. Must require some serious skills!
The ole “Ahhhhhhhh!!! It doesn’t confirm my bias!! Ahhhhhhhh!!!”
Now where have I seen that before. Hmmmmmm. 😂
Ok help me out. Point out the exact evidence he provided
True, I am not familiar with the statistical techniques antivaxxers use to claim mass death is happening but (logically) there is no data to prove it. Must require some serious skills!
The ole “Ahhhhhhhh!!! It doesn’t confirm my bias!! Ahhhhhhhh!!!”
Now where have I seen that before. Hmmmmmm. 😂
People are still denying the material increase in excess deaths.
Poor babies. Hang out at Venice Beach and pound sand you worthless bums. You are not qualified to pour coffee. You can't even hang out in front of Home Depot looking for one day of work because you have never used a hammer or a screwdriver in your miserable lives.
The L.A. Times began laying off 115 newsroom employees on Tuesday. Owner Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong said the cuts were necessary to trim heavy financial losses.
Sure, the vaccine-hesitant don't have to get a poke in the arm to walk down the street. But if they want to work or go to a baseball game or concert, employers and other organizations can demand vaccination. And they should.
Now that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine has received full approval, employers and public businesses have legal cover to start issuing mandates for employees and customers. And they should.
Poor babies. Hang out at Venice Beach and pound sand you worthless bums. You are not qualified to pour coffee. You can't even hang out in front of Home Depot looking for one day of work because you have never used a hammer or a screwdriver in your miserable lives.
