Trollminator wrote:
Sorry trumpers, Harris is taking PA and there is nothing you can do about it. You failed women and now they want you gone.
"All three surveys indicated that a widening gender gap that benefits Harris is fueling her overall advantage over Trump."
"This is female-gender advantage on steroids," Suffolk University Political Research director Dave Paleologos told Fox News. "In all three data sets, the women margin is around almost twice Trump's edge among men."
-
61
-
Trollminator wrote:
Sorry trumpers, Harris is taking PA and there is nothing you can do about it. You failed women and now they want you gone.
"All three surveys indicated that a widening gender gap that benefits Harris is fueling her overall advantage over Trump."
"This is female-gender advantage on steroids," Suffolk University Political Research director Dave Paleologos told Fox News. "In all three data sets, the women margin is around almost twice Trump's edge among men."
Women putting a black woman in the WH. Imagine what an ouchie that is for a POS like adolt, or Trump.
71 -
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote:
^ Here's the ignorance and short sighted stupidity of the typical liberal on full display.
Non-comeback. Shocking. Go dust your framed GED, DF.
The founders created the electoral college for a reason. They were much much much smarter than you even think you are and you think your IQ is about 100 points higher than it actually is.
You are ignorant because you do not understand the purpose of the electoral college.
You are stupid because even when it is explained to you you still don't understand it.
You are shortsighted because in the future the Democrats will win an election through the electoral college and lose the popular vote. If imbeciles like you got your way and did away with it now you would have a fit when the change came back to bite you.
I was in graduate school while you were at the mall lying to little boys about your military service trying to get them to go home with you.
This post was edited 12 minutes after it was posted.411 -
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
Women putting a black woman in the WH. Imagine what an ouchie that is for a POS like adolt, or Trump.
What is a woman?
17 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
Non-comeback. Shocking. Go dust your framed GED, DF.
you think you're IQ is
You are ignorant
You are stupid
You are shortsighted
I was in graduate school
“You’re” graduate school may want their associates degree back.
lol.
52 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote:
you think you're IQ is
You are ignorant
You are stupid
You are shortsighted
I was in graduate school
“You’re” graduate school may want their associates degree back.
lol.
Don’t talk about Ohio State that way. Cardale Jones is a notable intellect.
34 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
Non-comeback. Shocking. Go dust your framed GED, DF.
The founders created the electoral college for a reason. They were much much much smarter than you even think you are and you think your IQ is about 100 points higher than it actually is.
You are ignorant because you do not understand the purpose of the electoral college.
You are stupid because even when it is explained to you you still don't understand it.
You are shortsighted because in the future the Democrats will win an election through the electoral college and lose the popular vote. If imbeciles like you got your way and did away with it now you would have a fit when the change came back to bite you.
I was in graduate school while you were at the mall lying to little boys about your military service trying to get them to go home with you.
They created the Electoral College as a compromise due to pressure from southern states who wanted to include their non-voting slaves in their electoral power. Hamilton, on the other hand, favored direct election.
The system needs to go. In practice, it renders the majority of the country’s votes as meaningless. A Republican in California may as well skip the presidential vote, just as a Democrat in Alabama. A popular vote for president would make all votes count equally and end the pandering we see today to the handful of swing states.
84 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote:
The founders created the electoral college for a reason. They were much much much smarter than you even think you are and you think your IQ is about 100 points higher than it actually is.
You are ignorant because you do not understand the purpose of the electoral college.
You are stupid because even when it is explained to you you still don't understand it.
You are shortsighted because in the future the Democrats will win an election through the electoral college and lose the popular vote. If imbeciles like you got your way and did away with it now you would have a fit when the change came back to bite you.
I was in graduate school while you were at the mall lying to little boys about your military service trying to get them to go home with you.
They created the Electoral College as a compromise due to pressure from southern states who wanted to include their non-voting slaves in their electoral power. Hamilton, on the other hand, favored direct election.
The system needs to go. In practice, it renders the majority of the country’s votes as meaningless. A Republican in California may as well skip the presidential vote, just as a Democrat in Alabama. A popular vote for president would make all votes count equally and end the pandering we see today to the handful of swing states.
You're confused. That's not what Hamilton favored. Try again.
25 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
Non-comeback. Shocking. Go dust your framed GED, DF.
The founders created the electoral college for a reason. They were much much much smarter than you even think you are and you think your IQ is about 100 points higher than it actually is.
You are ignorant because you do not understand the purpose of the electoral college.
You are stupid because even when it is explained to you you still don't understand it.
You are shortsighted because in the future the Democrats will win an election through the electoral college and lose the popular vote. If imbeciles like you got your way and did away with it now you would have a fit when the change came back to bite you.
I was in graduate school while you were at the mall lying to little boys about your military service trying to get them to go home with you.
Hey, look everybody - the resident homophobe is making jokes about sexual encounters with minors.
Isn't that nice, making jokes about pedophilia.
Pardon me when I suggest that side moderators should ban POS like you.
32 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
Nnonequalsweek12 wrote:
Non-comeback. Shocking. Go dust your framed GED, DF.
The founders created the electoral college for a reason. They were much much much smarter than you even think you are and you think your IQ is about 100 points higher than it actually is.
You are ignorant because you do not understand the purpose of the electoral college.
You are stupid because even when it is explained to you you still don't understand it.
You are shortsighted because in the future the Democrats will win an election through the electoral college and lose the popular vote. If imbeciles like you got your way and did away with it now you would have a fit when the change came back to bite you.
I was in graduate school while you were at the mall lying to little boys about your military service trying to get them to go home with you.
Hah
the electoral college was meant EXACTLY to have a bunch of wise citizens stop a corrupt demagogue like Trump from seducing the masses into voting him into the presidency and leading the nation into disaster.
I mean exactly. That's what it was for. To stop Trump.
And to serve as a compromise to get conservative slave states to join the union.
So for you, a full-on trump voter, to use original intent to defend the institution...is pretty funny.
The writers of the Constitution would have been really disappointed in you.
And you aren't making any sense. If you want to go with original intent, you have to say the Electoral College should reject trump no matter what the voters say. There's a 1% chance you would go along with that.
This post was edited 5 minutes after it was posted.52 -
WinstonSmith wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
They created the Electoral College as a compromise due to pressure from southern states who wanted to include their non-voting slaves in their electoral power. Hamilton, on the other hand, favored direct election.
The system needs to go. In practice, it renders the majority of the country’s votes as meaningless. A Republican in California may as well skip the presidential vote, just as a Democrat in Alabama. A popular vote for president would make all votes count equally and end the pandering we see today to the handful of swing states.
You're confused. That's not what Hamilton favored. Try again.
You’re right on that, got my wires crossed. But everything else was correct. It was a compromise for the southern states to count their slaves in electoral weight and it also makes the Republican votes in California and Democrat votes in Alabama meaningless.
Direct election would make them count.
10 -
Trollminator wrote:
Sorry trumpers, Harris is taking PA and there is nothing you can do about it. You failed women and now they want you gone.
"All three surveys indicated that a widening gender gap that benefits Harris is fueling her overall advantage over Trump."
"This is female-gender advantage on steroids," Suffolk University Political Research director Dave Paleologos told Fox News. "In all three data sets, the women margin is around almost twice Trump's edge among men."
but some random M@GA guy on right wing twitter posted his latest numbers and Trump is winning in every swing state.
he even made a nice little graphic to support the claim so you know it has to accurate.
50 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
They created the Electoral College as a compromise due to pressure from southern states who wanted to include their non-voting slaves in their electoral power. Hamilton, on the other hand, favored direct election.
The system needs to go. In practice, it renders the majority of the country’s votes as meaningless. A Republican in California may as well skip the presidential vote, just as a Democrat in Alabama. A popular vote for president would make all votes count equally and end the pandering we see today to the handful of swing states.
Dems love to whine about losing the election even though they win the popular vote. How about we just eliminate the Senate while we are at it and we can just have a king based on the popular vote so that a handful of heavily populated states can determine policy for the rest of the country?
24 -
Voting matters wrote:
Jeff Wigand wrote:
They created the Electoral College as a compromise due to pressure from southern states who wanted to include their non-voting slaves in their electoral power. Hamilton, on the other hand, favored direct election.
The system needs to go. In practice, it renders the majority of the country’s votes as meaningless. A Republican in California may as well skip the presidential vote, just as a Democrat in Alabama. A popular vote for president would make all votes count equally and end the pandering we see today to the handful of swing states.
Dems love to whine about losing the election even though they win the popular vote. How about we just eliminate the Senate while we are at it and we can just have a king based on the popular vote so that a handful of heavily populated states can determine policy for the rest of the country?
Hard to even mock this post, it's so dumb.
elect a king for a republic? How exactly would that make the leader a king? Or our nation a republic?
the most votes shouldn't win elections?
majority rule isn't a key part democracy and isn't worth supporting?
Why can't a bunch of small states band together to outvote their urban brothers and sisters? And if they can't do that, why should they get to rule anyway?
The senate is a weird one. We didn't originally elect senators...state legislators chose them. So you have a point that the senate was originally meant to be an anti-democracy body. But then we changed it into another piece of democracy. And we have to go with what the Constitution says NOW, not what it said 200 years ago.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.31 -
Jeff Wigand wrote:
WinstonSmith wrote:
You're confused. That's not what Hamilton favored. Try again.
You’re right on that, got my wires crossed. But everything else was correct. It was a compromise for the southern states to count their slaves in electoral weight and it also makes the Republican votes in California and Democrat votes in Alabama meaningless.
Direct election would make them count.
You're confused again.
You're thinking of the 3/5's compromise which was an anti-slavery compromise.
The south wanted to count their slaves in the representation apportionment and the non-slave states compromised on 3/5's.
Direct election would give New York and California all the power and take all the power away from the smaller states.
What reason would Idaho have to want to be ruled by California?
35 -
agip wrote:
Hah
the electoral college was meant EXACTLY to have a bunch of wise citizens stop a corrupt demagogue like Trump from seducing the masses into voting him into the presidency and leading the nation into disaster.
I mean exactly. That's what it was for. To stop Trump.
And to serve as a compromise to get conservative slave states to join the union.
So for you, a full-on trump voter, to use original intent to defend the institution...is pretty funny.
The writers of the Constitution would have been really disappointed in you.
And you aren't making any sense. If you want to go with original intent, you have to say the Electoral College should reject trump no matter what the voters say. There's a 1% chance you would go along with that.
So you think only property-owning white males should be able to vote?
31 -
kamala voters should be forced to house migrants.35
-
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Tea party Trevor wrote:
Lolz
Gary posted a Tweet from some right wing hack named “black insurrectionist” that a “whistleblower that would prove Kamala was given the questions beforehand” was coming forward this week to expose the scandal.
Today Marge Trailor Grease says this nameless whistleblower is dead “according to news sources” so she won’t be coming forward.
Everything Gary posts including his strange right wing polls are pure garbage likely funded by Russia.
But you knew that already.
Hey Trevor, SUCK ON THIS
Here are the 6 pages of the affidavit for easier sharing. I made an error in the original posting. I duplicated page 5. I would also like to note that there are several pages after the verification page that were specifics about the job the whistleblower did and a transcript of the recordings he had made. The transcripts are even worse than the affidavit.-Black Insurrectionist..
My name is not Trevor.
I have been in touch with Black Insurrectionist via encrypted means. He is hanging in there. Weathering the storm, so to speak. He speaks fondly of you and other carriers.
The ABC blower is confirmed killed.
We have evidence. Lots of evidence. We are going to bomb the socks off of liberal America and their riggings.
This is a DEVELOPING situation.
21 -
agip wrote:
Voting matters wrote:
Dems love to whine about losing the election even though they win the popular vote. How about we just eliminate the Senate while we are at it and we can just have a king based on the popular vote so that a handful of heavily populated states can determine policy for the rest of the country?
Hard to even mock this post, it's so dumb.
elect a king for a republic? How exactly would that make the leader a king? Or our nation a republic?
the most votes shouldn't win elections?
majority rule isn't a key part democracy and isn't worth supporting?
Why can't a bunch of small states band together to outvote their urban brothers and sisters? And if they can't do that, why should they get to rule anyway?
The senate is a weird one. We didn't originally elect senators...state legislators chose them. So you have a point that the senate was originally meant to be an anti-democracy body. But then we changed it into another piece of democracy. And we have to go with what the Constitution says NOW, not what it said 200 years ago.
The USA isn't a Democracy...
47
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.