Board Reader wrote:
So now let’s apply the three factors of believability to Goodge.Plausibility of the claim: A transcon is an extraordinary feat, no matter the pace. Doing it at or near a record breaking pace? Even more extraordinary. Whoever is claiming to do that better be a great runner and have incontrovertible proof.
Credibility of the person: Goodge is an ordinary runner with modest PBs. On top of that, he’s an established liar who lied about breaking the consecutive marathon record discussed many pages ago on this thread. He’s also using this run to sell what appears to be a snake oil product, which further lowers his credibility. Plus both he and his mate Balenger appear to be attention-seeking narcissists who try to make themselves appear to be better athletes than they really are.
Quality of the evidence: Sorely lacking! It’s not just the irregularities in heart rate and pace that Will C has painstakingly outlined for us. It’s the irregularities plus the lack of a tracking device on his person, plus the lack of ongoing monitoring, plus the lack of camera footage.
So we have an extraordinary claim made by a non-credible person who has weak evidence. I don’t believe him.
+1
This is the best, most succinct opinion I've seen thus far on the thread.