Anti roe people are more likely to be uneducated, gun-owning, supporting beating kids, dogmatically religious(to the point of letting priests molest their kids) , poor, and have proven they care little for kids post birth.
pro-choice people have better qualities
“Pro-life people care little for kids after birth”
Pro-choice terrorists proceed to fire bomb, vandalize and threaten workers at centers that assist mothers with crisis pregnancies before and after birth.
Also, Christians (I understand all are not pro-life, though most are) are twice as likely to adopt and much more likely to adopt OLDER kids. That’s important, because most people don’t want to adopt older kids.
“Pro-life people care little for kids after birth”
Pro-choice terrorists proceed to fire bomb, vandalize and threaten workers at centers that assist mothers with crisis pregnancies before and after birth.
Also, Christians (I understand all are not pro-life, though most are) are twice as likely to adopt and much more likely to adopt OLDER kids. That’s important, because most people don’t want to adopt older kids.
Catholics are split 50/50 in US on abortion.
You really do not know much about what you spew.
Catholics aren’t the only Christian group in the US. Southern Baptist Convention is around 15 million strong and the majority are pro-life. Just admit the “pro-lifers only care about babies in the womb” line is garbage. The pregnancy crisis center in my area helps moms with cribs, diapers, formula, daycare, as well as help finding a job if needed. Most of these services are free or at a highly discounted rate.
Btw-you have a couple of alter egos. None are smart
So because pro life terrorist exists then pro choice terrorism is permissible? Your moral compass is askew. How about we denounce terrorism on both sides.
My point for bringing up pro choice terrorism, most recently Jane’s revenge (sounds super scary), is to note that they are attacking the very centers that provide support for babies and moms AFTER birth.
The ole “pro lifers only care about babies in the womb” line is easily debunked. Time for some new material from you guys.
Oh boy…whose going to tell him about southern baptists
Southern Baptist convention is very much pro life, along with most other Christian evangelical denominations. Jehovah’s Witness as well, although some would argue that they aren’t Christian’s.
At any rate, it’s nonsense to keep blubbering on about no one caring for babies once they’re born. Plenty of pregnancy crisis centers exist with many people supporting those with financial donations.
Catholics aren’t the only Christian group in the US. Southern Baptist Convention is around 15 million strong and the majority are pro-life. Just admit the “pro-lifers only care about babies in the womb” line is garbage. The pregnancy crisis center in my area helps moms with cribs, diapers, formula, daycare, as well as help finding a job if needed. Most of these services are free or at a highly discounted rate.
Good - all those things are important. Birth control would be biggest net positive though.
Oh boy…whose going to tell him about southern baptists
Southern Baptist convention is very much pro life, along with most other Christian evangelical denominations. Jehovah’s Witness as well, although some would argue that they aren’t Christian’s.
At any rate, it’s nonsense to keep blubbering on about no one caring for babies once they’re born. Plenty of pregnancy crisis centers exist with many people supporting those with financial donations.
Can you restate your argument.
What are we talking about? That Christians do charity. Yes?
Do Christians do enough to offset the negatives of forcing women to carry babies to term? I don't think so.
Psst here’s a tip bro .. they are called pregnancy crisis centers. they focus on …guess what pregnancy.
I didn’t say no one cares about babies after the birth just pro lifers. I mean in my state every pro-life politician voted against full free pre-k bey their pro life constitutes wanted them to.
you think throwing a couple of diapers at women for 4-6 months make up for taking away healthcare, services?
Psst here’s a tip bro .. they are called pregnancy crisis centers. they focus on …guess what pregnancy.
I didn’t say no one cares about babies after the birth just pro lifers. I mean in my state every pro-life politician voted against full free pre-k bey their pro life constitutes wanted them to.
you think throwing a couple of diapers at women for 4-6 months make up for taking away healthcare, services?
Letting the poor be poor and letting sufferers suffer is part of the Christian tradition.
Southern Baptist convention is very much pro life, along with most other Christian evangelical denominations. Jehovah’s Witness as well, although some would argue that they aren’t Christian’s.
At any rate, it’s nonsense to keep blubbering on about no one caring for babies once they’re born. Plenty of pregnancy crisis centers exist with many people supporting those with financial donations.
Can you restate your argument.
What are we talking about? That Christians do charity. Yes?
Do Christians do enough to offset the negatives of forcing women to carry babies to term? I don't think so.
The old mantra that pro-lifers only care about babies in the womb is an easily debunked lie that is trotted out any time abortion is mentioned. That is my position and I substantiate it by mentioned Christians are 2x as likely to adopt as the typical population. Yes, I understand not all Christians are pro-life, but a good portion of them are.
Many churches also fund pregnancy crisis centers which also help mothers and their babies after birth. These very centers are being systematically attacked in the fall out since the Dobbs decision leak.
Your last line Christians not doing enough is true. There has been a concerted effort since the Dobbs decision for Christian organizations to step up their efforts for post birth assistance for mothers and babies. There are also plenty of parents willing to adopt but cost and procedural difficulties make it difficult. Making adoption less financially burdensome is probably something that needs to be considered.
Psst here’s a tip bro .. they are called pregnancy crisis centers. they focus on …guess what pregnancy.
I didn’t say no one cares about babies after the birth just pro lifers. I mean in my state every pro-life politician voted against full free pre-k bey their pro life constitutes wanted them to.
you think throwing a couple of diapers at women for 4-6 months make up for taking away healthcare, services?
Uh yeah, that’s the point…to help women in a crisis who don’t want to have an abortion. But they also provide after birth assistance as I mentioned earlier. The one local to me actually helps pay for daycare for moms as well as helps them find jobs if needed.
Abortion is still legal, what healthcare was taken away?
Psst here’s a tip bro .. they are called pregnancy crisis centers. they focus on …guess what pregnancy.
I didn’t say no one cares about babies after the birth just pro lifers. I mean in my state every pro-life politician voted against full free pre-k bey their pro life constitutes wanted them to.
you think throwing a couple of diapers at women for 4-6 months make up for taking away healthcare, services?
Letting the poor be poor and letting sufferers suffer is part of the Christian tradition.
Christians are the most charitable group in the US. Republicans also donate much more to charity than liberals, but that’s neither here nor there. Dems are the new party of the rich. Atheists and such.
Letting the poor be poor and letting sufferers suffer is part of the Christian tradition.
Christians are the most charitable group in the US. Republicans also donate much more to charity than liberals, but that’s neither here nor there. Dems are the new party of the rich. Atheists and such.
I dont count giving to a church as a real charity. Lots of churches are just scams basically.
Non-religious giving favors democrats and independents.
It apparently has as much value as a cockroach for the Monkey because it won’t blink twice before killing it.
Do this Monkey: if you ever have children and have more than one and like one more than the other, an altogether normal thing, kill the other one coz less value means it’s not worthy of life to you.
You really should be out protesting an IVF clinic if you actually feel the way you claim. They commit countless murders daily under the logic you lay out here.
Catholics aren’t the only Christian group in the US. Southern Baptist Convention is around 15 million strong and the majority are pro-life. Just admit the “pro-lifers only care about babies in the womb” line is garbage. The pregnancy crisis center in my area helps moms with cribs, diapers, formula, daycare, as well as help finding a job if needed. Most of these services are free or at a highly discounted rate.
It shows pretty clearly that you don’t think it’s a person. Otherwise you’d save 100 lives instead of 1.
Sounds like your entire argument is based on the presumption that everyone would choose the five year old over the embryos but some of us Roe opposers told you in no uncertain terms that we would choose the embryos, yet you are dancing to the same presumptive rhythm. It seems like your celebratory dance doesn’t depend on the answer to your silly conundrum question.
If this is true you should be at an IVF clinic right now. Countless embryos discarded that is just as bad as headshotting a 5 year old, in your eyes.
so no, you don’t actually care that much about embryos. You feel for my gorilla-strength rhetorical trap and have thusly shown yourself to be: