Potentially Suspicious Runner To Run 836 Miles in 9 Days for "Charity"

FMD, in other articles he gave up fags 30 November 2014 when smoking 60 a day, in that article it's 2013 and 40 a day. Even cheats and lies about that.

I know but I also know he wrote it

insider... wrote:

I know but I also know he wrote it

Hmmm, you will have to fight Shite Hawk for my love.

he uses en dash's ( – ) where he doesn't need to

seven in that article (another two legit father-in-law)

lots of them all over his web site

go to his articles on his web site and look for them

in case you're a moran I'll make it real easy for you

use find: with 'ctrl f' then copy and paste this:

–

first article Sunday 22nd Jun, 2014 9

second Wednesday 18th Jun, 2014 7

third Wednesday 18th Jun, 2014 5

who do think picked up that terrie was bunch of lying wankers and funniest forum because she used he's instead of his on her fb and posts here

I might be a moran but not friggin stupid

our photographer was in on it

you'd have to be moran to think otherwise

over and out

http://www.markhewlettphotography.com/my-articles/

insider... wrote:

written by mark hewlett photographer you know the fella who followed Dave everywhere snapping away but never had a clue he was a cheat and fraudster

And wasn't he pals with Dave from some time back in the day?, not sure on that one.

My God, you are right. Mark Hewlett does have a tell tale "-" characteristic to his writing. He very likely wrote that magazine article about Dave that uses the same "-" characteristics.

Shite Hawke, I think you may want to reconsider how innocent Mark really is and when he knew it was all a scam.

Pals back in the day? wrote:

insider... wrote:

written by mark hewlett photographer you know the fella who followed Dave everywhere snapping away but never had a clue he was a cheat and fraudster

And wasn't he pals with Dave from some time back in the day?, not sure on that one.

Yep, Dave and Mark are very good personal friends according to their Facebook posts. They were even considering going on vacation together.

insider... wrote:

he uses en dash's ( – ) where he doesn't need to

seven in that article (another two legit father-in-law)

lots of them all over his web site

go to his articles on his web site and look for them

in case you're a moran I'll make it real easy for you

use find: with 'ctrl f' then copy and paste this:

–

first article Sunday 22nd Jun, 2014 9

second Wednesday 18th Jun, 2014 7

third Wednesday 18th Jun, 2014 5

who do think picked up that terrie was bunch of lying wankers and funniest forum because she used he's instead of his on her fb and posts here

I might be a moran but not friggin stupid

our photographer was in on it

you'd have to be moran to think otherwise

over and out

http://www.markhewlettphotography.com/my-articles/

There is no possible way the photographer and driver weren't in on it.

No idea why some people seem to think the reason they abandoned the trip was because those two were honest and wouldn't cheat.

You don't organise a scam trip like that and have people on the trip NOT in on it.

ANYONE on that van HAD to be in on it.

Tinfoil Hat wrote:

Pals back in the day? wrote:

And wasn't he pals with Dave from some time back in the day?, not sure on that one.

Yep, Dave and Mark are very good personal friends according to their Facebook posts. They were even considering going on vacation together.

Yes. I posted a video from Mark's photography page that states a CHARLIE Reading plus Dave are looking to go to Kenya with Mark Hewlett.

HE WAS IN ON THE SCAM.

Pals back in the day? wrote:

insider... wrote:

written by mark hewlett photographer you know the fella who followed Dave everywhere snapping away but never had a clue he was a cheat and fraudster

And wasn't he pals with Dave from some time back in the day?, not sure on that one.

You might be on to something here.

This part from the article may be in reference to the "pals."

"…I couldn't shift the cravings I had for a fag."

hmmmm

Brokeback Mountain Ultra Brits in Kenya?

Maybe.

Mark Hewlett might be a good bloke just as Shite Hawk says he is, but he was in on it.

Why?, good for business, he could see it snow balling and going viral, it already had to some degree, notice all the photos credited to 'Photograph: Mark Hewlett' in the articles.

Imagine if Dave had got away with it and became a hero and travelling ambassador for WWTW, gets invites to special functions, motivational seminars, schools, etc, etc around the country on the WWTW expense account, perhaps even overseas, meets people like the patron of WWTW Prince Harry, now that would be good for business for any photographer.

And who's always there to photograph and perhaps even write an article to distribute to the media and online, probably also on WWTW expense account?, yep, definitely good for business. As he says "Commissions accepted."

Dave and Mark were scratching each others back to the benefit of each.

Joe the driver, not so sure, he threatened to bail out on day two when he realized fully that it was a sham, wouldn't have been any other reason and probably threatened to out Dave, definitely out Dave, possibly Mark. The rest is history.

But this thread ain't dead yet.

mark and dave ??? wrote:

You might be on to something here.

This part from the article may be in reference to the "pals."

"…I couldn't shift the cravings I had for a fag."

hmmmm

Haha, good one, but that's too witty and subtle for the LR forum.

Fair enough. wrote:

It should be because these ultra cheaters/frauds/scammers are the one's making you real ultra fellas look like clowns.

Just sayin'.

When I looked at their echo chamber, what struck me is they seemed to think that the main crime was being caught. I further wonder whether this is systemic and if you are running distances nobody else cares about at a pace that doesn't impress the rest of the running community there is a relaxed attitude about taking short cuts?

Good for business. wrote:

And who's always there to photograph and perhaps even write an article to distribute to the media and online,

Hewlett wrote these, unnecessary – all through the articles, probably more article examples out there too.

The media loves this sort of copy, because it's exactly that, copy and publish, no work or time involved and just get a junior reporter to put their name to it.

hewletts the organ grinder

daves the monkey

ExpertKipWatcher wrote:

I further wonder whether this is systemic and if you are running distances nobody else cares about at a pace that doesn't impress the rest of the running community there is a relaxed attitude about taking short cuts?

I'm wondering that too. That seems to be how Ben Rogers has remained below the radar despite providing very suspicious evidence of what he is claiming. How many more people are falsely claiming to run huge mileage? And why do they choose running? Do cycling and swimming suffer from the same exaggerated claims?

Read Recpt wrote:

I have sent them the missing mat times but they haven't opened my message yet.

It could be that they have but chose to ignore 'read receipt' or have IT policies on their email servers that strips out 'read receipt' requests.

London are seeing his 2016 result is being looked into -

"Hi, I will pass this onto a full time member of staff at the London Marathon. It's only 1 week out & the busiest time of year so not sure what will be done before the marathon."

Media Monitor. wrote:

Good for business. wrote:

And who's always there to photograph and perhaps even write an article to distribute to the media and online,

Hewlett wrote these, unnecessary – all through the articles, probably more article examples out there too.

The media loves this sort of copy, because it's exactly that, copy and publish, no work or time involved and just get a junior reporter to put their name to it.

http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/ex-serviceman-attempting-to-run-from-land-s-end-to-john-o-groats-in-world-record-time-after-being-inspired-by-olympic-champion-sir-mo-farah-1-4953508http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/604025/ex-RAF-dad-Dave-Reading-quit-smoking-33-marathons-nine-days

Good eye, those articles definitely seem to be written by Mark. This gives further support that Mark Hewllet is deeper involved in the scam than I gave him credit for.